Move Over, ‘Meerkat Manor’
As a victim of plagiarism, I am left wondering how many other works of mine have been purloined? And what does Edwards owe me? Does she owe me anything, aside from an apology and maybe a free, autographed copy of her book with an "attaboy" on the passage in question? My words did not enhance her novel. They were filler. I can imagine frustrated and horny readers cursing the ferrets and skipping ahead in search of the next nipple.
I'm no longer angry with Edwards. In fact, I feel sorry for her. The blogosphere is buzzing with irate calls to boycott Edwards's books and appearances. According to an interview she did with the Associated Press, she did not know she was supposed to quote source materials. Ignorance of law and ethics is no excuse, however. Plagiarism victimizes writers. It betrays the trust of readers. It tarnishes the craft of writing.
But there is another victim here that has been lost in the discussion: the ferrets.
About 1,000 black-footed ferrets exist in the wild. They were thought extinct until a small population was discovered in 1981. Eighteen survivors were taken into a captive breeding program that has yielded all the black-footed ferrets alive today. About 300 of these live in the Conata Basin, one of the largest and healthiest wild populations. Even here, however, these endangered species have no sanctuary.
Prairie dog colonies are being poisoned to protect drought-stricken grasslands for cattle, which compete with the rodents for grass. Ferrets, which are utterly dependent upon large prairie dog colonies, are on the brink of extinction because their prey has been largely eradicated.
Back in 1850, when ferrets existed across vast swaths of prairie, Shadow Bear and Shiona Bramlett never could have comprehended that those cute critters would one day face such troubles.


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: SheilaE @ 03/21/2008 1:55:56 PM
Comment: Though it seems a bit unfair to stereotype all romance novels as "trashy", I can't fault the writer for sharing their own opinion, espeically if that opinion is based off of what was just read out of that novel. That was terrible! But, it is also not reflective of romance novels of today. Many of romance novels today are written by well educated and/or trained people. Many doctors and attorneys write romance these days. It just isn't the same genre it was back when Edwards started writing romance.
I think the author here should be given kudos for being able to laugh it off .
I also think that Cassie Edwards should have at least apologized when the author called her. It's one thing to be ignorant of the law, but another to be ignorant of simple etiquette. My 6 year old know when she owes an apology!
I felt sorry for Edwards. She got crucified online. I hope she has learned a valuable lesson. I'm sure there are a lot of people who learned from her very media-visible mistake.
Posted By: Xavienne @ 03/01/2008 1:40:36 PM
Comment: You're going to call him out as ignorant after someone plagiarizes his work and then claims they didn't know they had to quote source?
Oh, and FYI? Just because something sells well, doesn't mean it's good, nor classy. Uggs and Crocs are prime examples of this.
Posted By: jacywilder @ 02/19/2008 6:03:17 PM
Comment: For someone who writes non-fiction research related pieces, this piece was certainly not researched. Call romance what you will but it is almost 55% of the paperback market. With those kind of numbers your comments only make you seem small and ignorant.