Quantcast

 
Discuss
 
Member Comments
  • Posted By: reunionpi @ 07/02/2008 5:39:04 PM

    Comment: Obama's mother's original Social Security Number Application


    http://webofdeception.com/obamamother'sssapplication.html

  • Posted By: srirerng @ 03/05/2008 1:19:15 PM

    Comment: Do you think Obama using sex appeal song 'I have a crush on Obama' to campaign for young voter?

  • Posted By: srirerng @ 03/05/2008 11:55:28 AM

    Comment: Obama blamed Hillary on her judgement to authorize the force in Iraq. How was his judgement in connection to Tony Rezko? He is now accept that it was the mistake. Hillary voted for the war based on information provided at that time. Obama was not there to cast the vote. Who would know what his vote would be? He said it was the dumb war way after it was authorized. He also voted for Present over hundred times neither say Yes or No. Is that show the judgement as a Commander in Chief?

  • Posted By: timmcgivern @ 03/04/2008 9:40:59 PM

    Comment: I'll try this again, because I got an error message: To carole palmer: Why do you presume to tell Hillary Clinton that she shouldn't continue her campaign? She, and her supporters like me, happen to truly believe that she has a better chance of defeating McCain, and she would be a better president. If we believe that, then why should she roll over for Obama? She has every right to fight on, and she should, until the race is clearly decided. And by the way, why is it that Obama and his supporters, when talking about "attack politics," totally disregard his and THEIR constant personal attacks about Hillary? How about the comments below by "akaplannh" below, where he compares her to his "hararanguing and scolding" mother, and implies that she is not a "strong, bright, engaging woman?" What exactly does that have to do with the issues? It's nothing but a personal, adhominem attack. But if Hillary legitimately questions Obama's experience or stands on specific issues, somehow she's "attacking" him. Go figure.

  • Posted By: timmcgivern @ 03/04/2008 9:32:01 PM

    Comment: mmm

  • Posted By: timmcgivern @ 03/04/2008 9:30:18 PM

    Comment: To carole palmer: Why do you presume to tell Hillary Clinton to withdraw? She believes she would have a better chance against McCain, and she believes she would be a better president than Obama, and a lot of people, like me, agree with her. So if she truly believes those things, she has every right to continue her run, even if she eventually fails. She or we are under no obligation to timidly accept the hijacking of our party by the Obama camp, which consists largely, of "new" voters who haven't fought in the trenches as Hillary and many of her supporters have for years. It's our right to fight on. And by the way, why is it that Obama and his supporters absolutely fail to recognize his and THEIR attacks on HER? How about the personal attacks leveled by "akaplannh" below, saying that she reminds him of his "harranguing and scolding" mother? I guess those don't count. And yet if Hillary legitimately qestions Obama's experience or standing on a particular issue, she's "attacking" him.

  • Posted By: akaplannh @ 03/04/2008 4:53:17 PM

    Comment: I'm 54, male, and would have no problem voting for a strong, bright, engaging wonman. My mother is one. But Hillary Clinton? Find me another!

    Watching Senator Clinton the past couple of weeks reminds me of harranguing and scolding by my mother.

    The BIG difference between the two; (1) I love my mom and; (2) my mother ceased using these methods in my early adulthood,

    when she saw harranguing and scolding didn't achieve the desired results.

  • Posted By: carolcpalmer@cox.net @ 03/04/2008 3:44:36 PM

    Comment: Please tell me I'm nuts. I'm convinced Hillary would much rather have her buddy, McCain, as President for the next 4 years and then run in 2012 than she would want Obama to win. Thus all the attack ads and refusals to withdraw. After all, it's all about Hillary! She is one scary lady! Bet she stays on the attack against him, no matter what happens today!

  • Posted By: freelancer @ 02/12/2008 9:16:14 PM

    Comment: I also am curious to find out why over 10,000 people in Virginia would vote for Romney. HOW can they vote for Romney? Isn't he out of the race now -- meaning, shouldn't his name not even be on the ballot anymore?

  • Posted By: freelancer @ 02/12/2008 9:14:26 PM

    Comment: How can there already be projections that Obama is the winner in DC when the main NBC website continues to show 0% precincts reporting? Even if he probably will win DC, shouldn't they not project until there are at least almost 50% precincts reporting?

  • Posted By: jimmy2nuts @ 02/12/2008 7:45:22 PM

    Comment: We have stolen the cloak of inevitablity! Go Barack!!

  • Posted By: jimmy2nuts @ 02/12/2008 7:44:30 PM

    Comment: We have stolen the cloak of inevitablity! Go Barack!!

  • Posted By: True Democrat08 @ 02/12/2008 7:15:31 PM

    Comment: Women better take a close look at what's happening here. I see men willing to vote for the canidate with less experience, because he is a man. Women in Texas,Ohio, and Pennsylyania better come out in full force.

  • Posted By: kimhoover @ 02/12/2008 6:01:42 PM

    Comment: I don't think Hillary is waiting. I think she is managing expectations so people don't freak out if Obama has a few wins in a row.

  • Posted By: RED_WHITE_BLUE @ 02/12/2008 5:29:33 PM

    Comment: WHY SHOULD WE VOTE FOR A MAN WHO IS AFRAID TO DEBATE A WOMAN? HOW ON EARTH IS HE GOING TO DEBATE THE WORLD?

  • Posted By: abozeman @ 02/12/2008 4:03:52 PM

    Comment: Isn't Hillary Clinton's strategy to wait for the big states eerily similar to Gulian's failed strategy?

  • Posted By: abozeman @ 02/12/2008 4:02:50 PM

    Comment: Isn't Hillary Clinton's strategy to wait for the big states eerily similar to Gulian's failed strategy?

  • Posted By: john m flores @ 02/06/2008 12:42:29 AM

    Comment: btw, I've been listening/watching since 7pm. It's a multi-tasking world...

  • Posted By: john m flores @ 02/06/2008 12:41:40 AM

    Comment: Yes, thank you for coverage that was free of zooming flying backgrounds, fancy sets, and other histrionics. Very refreshing to have real reporting and real journalism. I'll be coming back for more and recommending Newsweek to friends and family...

  • Posted By: monkeysluvdani @ 02/05/2008 10:12:45 PM

    Comment: was the duggar family on stage?

  • Posted By: monkeysluvdani @ 02/05/2008 10:12:18 PM

    Comment: is the duggar family on stage?

  • Posted By: eric11harris @ 02/05/2008 8:04:04 PM

    Comment: Thank You For gving us LIVE Coverage of Super Tuesday.

  • Posted By: danieldprophet @ 02/05/2008 7:27:22 PM

    Comment: talknabout psycology why does the reportiing media only showcase Clinton and Obama, are they steering the vote

  • Posted By: danieldprophet @ 02/05/2008 7:25:17 PM

    Comment: Why hasn't Mike Huckabee recieved the free press coverage that the other candadates hohave recieved? Why does the media only talk about or cover or steer the audience towarsd the democratic side?

  • Posted By: luthershad @ 02/05/2008 7:24:07 PM

    Comment: I have read Newsweek for many years, and remember when you first changed Periscope, I was very upset. Life goes on and we all adapt

  • Posted By: marcosm13 @ 02/05/2008 7:09:29 PM

    Comment: AMAZING WEBCAST. Little in and out but generally good.

    • Posted By: marcosm13 @ 02/05/2008 19:20:56

      Comment: What's wrong with the audio!!!

  • Posted By: Donna P @ 02/05/2008 7:08:21 PM

    Comment: Yes, yes Romney in California. Your ads are working!!!!!

  • Posted By: Donna P @ 02/05/2008 7:07:43 PM

    Comment: Mitt - you get um, the ads are working in California and you will emerge victorios!!!!

  • Posted By: Kevinpsu160 @ 02/05/2008 7:02:19 PM

    Comment: Yes, Yes, Yes - Obama in Georgia

  • Posted By: CASSIDY @ 02/05/2008 6:47:36 PM

    Comment: Mitt- you blew it- did you really think those nasty ads would gain voters for you?

  • Posted By: CASSIDY @ 02/05/2008 6:46:32 PM

    Comment: Mitt- you blew it with your nasty expensive ads! DID YOU REALLY THINK THE ADS WOULD ENDEAR YOU TO THE VOTERS?

  • Posted By: injustime @ 02/05/2008 6:28:23 PM

    Comment: Hilary Clinton is very close to the George Bush family, lets get a bright problem solver in more Bureaucracy is not what we need. I agree Bill was decent but know the family has built a relationship with the Bush/cheney team thats not what we want............ is it?

  • Posted By: 1badz28 @ 02/05/2008 6:27:18 PM

    Comment: this is retarted
    these people suck at being on tv!!!
    i'd rather watch telemundo and i dont speak spanish

  • Posted By: injustime @ 02/05/2008 6:25:09 PM

    Comment: Obama would make a solid president. Hilary and George bussh senior are good friends....

    • Posted By: injustime @ 02/05/2008 18:29:33

      Comment: Wow I have read so much about the formed relationship of Bush and Clinton

  • Posted By: burk504 @ 02/05/2008 6:03:13 PM

    Comment: this is pretty cool

 
 
Reply
Cancel
 
 
Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Cancel
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu