Stacking the Deck

#1 IF YOU ARE GOING TO ATTACH THE CANDIDATES, WHY MUST IT ALWAYS BE MORE DIRECTION TOWARDS CLINTON? IS IT BECAUSE YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN?
YOUR REMARK "Hillary's oil slick, Again" IS DEMEANING AND IT SEEMS TO ME YOU ARE GETTING AWAY WITH YOUR MANIPULATED COMMENTS AGAINST THE CANDIDATES

I hope your 8 am class reads the article...it seems you didn't. There are two contradictions attributed to Clinton and Edwards, one sole to Obama, and one (troop status) to all three candidates. If there were other contradictions unreported, please feel free to share them. If not, is your argument the journalist didn't fabricate a contradiction.

Senator Obama did not contradict himself in regards to his criticism of President Bush???s ???having done nothing serious about alternative fuels or raising fuel efficiency.??? The original bill passed the Senate on an 85-12 vote; it passed the House 249-183. Bush???s hands were tied; how is it you give his administration credit for this?

Okay Brook - how about a fact check on your fact check. To say that Bush has signed 'major bills' to encourage use of alternative fuels or raise fuel efficiency of automobiles doesn't provide the whole story. After many veto threats of this democratic led bill, he very recently signed a comprimised bill to raise fuel efficiencies. To give Bush any credit for leading any environmental cause is very misleading. Try adding a little more context to your 'fact check' next time.

You need to fact check your fact checking. There is too much spin in your analysis. You are unfair to Hillary Clinton in her criticism of the Bush administration's policies toward returning soldiers. You fail to state that John Edwards was specifically asked about the requirement that citizen's speak English. And you're wrong in your defense of the Bush administration's actions in regard to energy policy. Stick to the facts and leave out the spin or you lose all credibility. It is clear the author and publisher of this purported analysis have their own dog in this fight.

PERSONALY I LIKE THE FACT, THAT NOW WE ALL KNOW IF ONE OUT THERE IS TELLING, THE MOST TRUTH, IT'S EDWARDS, AND THEY [MEDIA] DO LIKE TO PICK ON FRONT RUNNERS. ALL IN ALL, NO LIES IN HERE, ARE AS BAD AS THE LIES WE HAVE ALLREADY BEEN TOLD, FOR ALMOST 16 YEARS [BOTH BUSH ADMINS] SO IT'S A NO BRAINER, WHO IS THE BEST CHOICE!