Better Prevention or Changing Attitudes?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: breath @ 01/17/2008 5:58:04 PM

    Dear Logical thinker...i quote here you said... "So basically what you are saying is, since informed women are more likely to keep the baby lets inform them, however, since informed teens are more likely to have sex (be it probably in a safer manner) lets not inform them...." Absolutely wrong deduction from the words written...truth is...You were given a wonderfully created brain...use it to the full capacity...ask all the questions you can think of and don't ever be concerned you know more than can be spiritually answered...you were given that thinking,deductive brain for a reason...use it , educate your kids, be involved in their lives and trust them to run with what they learn. Also learn to love and forgive the person (ourselves here) who made mistakes in the past as none of us are the same people we were even yesterday. I sure hope you get a hold of this book on the Big Bang..DNA...and so much more..it's great. (again it's Francis Collin's book, (Francis is head of the Human Genome project, with over a 1000 geneticists under him) His book is titled The Language of God and offers a common ground for scientists and believers to MEET. Good talkin to you logical thinker!

    • Posted By: Logical_Thinker @ 01/18/2008 11:29:16 AM

      The quote you took is out of context. I was using that quote as an example of the wrong idea that many socially conservative people hold to be true. I personally believe in fully educating chlidren.

  • Posted By: kenewton @ 01/17/2008 3:17:51 PM

    Truth is that we all sit on the judgement board when we condemn the actions of others. Is it better that a child is brought into a house that resents it? Or an abusive house? Or to a family that has no belief in God? If God wants abortion stopped, He will stop it. To argue the right or wrong of it is ludicrous. Christians, pray hard for God's will to be done. That's all we can do. Personal opinions are not really important. All we are really doing is trying our best to show others here how intelligent we are so our prideful selves will swell up. Jesus spent His time here explaining that we should look at ourselves not others. Are we so perfect that we have no issues? Let's examine our own lives, and see where we can change instead of trying so hard to change everyone else.

    • Posted By: GeorgiaJayhawk @ 01/18/2008 10:33:32 AM

      I think that was possibly the mosty eloquent and thoughtful post regarding the Christian take on abortion. I agree whole heartedly that no one has the right to comdemn others for their decisions, and to go back and forth and fight with one another over very personal issues, where it is never going to be possible for everyone to agree on 100% is futile...it is truly a much better plan of action to look inward at ones own life and see where you can change yourself to be a better representation of the ideals you hold yourself to. I believe that if we all would just most time and energy managing our own affairs and less time nosing around in other peoples private lives, then the world would be a much more peaceful and productive place.

  • Posted By: ourfreedom @ 01/18/2008 8:56:35 AM

    Every woman needs choices. I am thankful for the choices I had. The law of the land should not make the final decision for us. Thank you America.

  • Posted By: CIAmom007 @ 01/17/2008 8:23:48 PM

    The abortion issue has some many in's and out's and what for's that it is virtually impossible to be able to address them all. The bottom line is that we are all human. Some of us stop and think while others do not. Some think they are doing the right thing and then "oops" a mistake happens or their form of contraception fails. Now that INDIVIDUAL is left with a CHOICE. Take road "A" with all consequences or "B" with all those consequenses. No matter what the decision there will be pro's and con's. Depending, yet again, on the individual, what can they or can't they handle. We do not travel the same road as another person, what is good for one isn't good for another. Will the person that got pregnant be accepted and not shunned by the church for getting pregnant out of wedlock. That person may choose to get an abortion then face the wrath of the church, then again maybe the church will help and be forgiving. What about the person who gets pregnant and stands to be disowned from the family if she kept it, than again maybe the family will embrace her. There are so many things to consider on an individual basis that it is crazy. People are on her e spouting what they would do, well have you ever been on the streets, gotten raped, ended up pregnant with no means and no family and so chooses to get an abortion for the childs sake? That person felt it was in the best interest of the child where you wouldn't have. Well you know what? IT WASN'T FOR YOU TO DECIDE!! That woman made a very difficult CHOICE as all human beings have a right to do.

    • Posted By: Highlandpark @ 01/17/2008 8:28:57 PM

      Like I said: It's the continuing empowerment of women that is causing the decline in abortions. This is something pro-life advocates would not agree with. Providing women with the resources they need to deal effectively with their own lives, such as education and choices, puts them in control and allows them to understand there are alternatives to abortion without condemnation. Ironically, it is the right to choose which causes the decline. There seems to be a camp which is not sophisticated enough to understand this. Pro-choice begets trust begets empowerment begets life. Simple.

      • Posted By: kellchecker @ 01/18/2008 3:31:10 AM

        I am pro-life. I agree that women need to be given needed resources so that they may deal effectively with their own lives. I agree that they need to know that there are alternatives to abortion without condemnation. I work at a "crisis pregnancy center," where we provide all of these things for women, giving them resources for helping them with money, housing, education, post-abortion trauma if they have aborted, or parenting classes, diapers, food, baby clothes, etc., if they choose to carry. Not all pro-lifers are out there to condemn. We always get lumped into that false view of us, when that's not how all of us are; sadly, the few that ARE like that - the condemning ones, give the rest of us, the majority of us, a bad name.

        • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/18/2008 6:57:17 AM

          Kellchecker I have been reading your posts and I have to say it's nice to hear from a prolifer that not only puts their money where their mouth is, but does so in an intelligent, honest, and positive fashion. The unfortunate thing about this issue (and many others) is that those who scream the loudest get the most attention. However, those who scream the loudest are not necessarily the best represtitives of the overall attitude of the group. I have absolute respect for prolifers who are working towards a real workable solution, and although I'm sure I will remain prochoice, if the two groups could get their heads together we could come up with solutions to at least some of the problems. My hats off to you!

  • Posted By: Logical_Thinker @ 01/17/2008 5:43:38 PM

    You know what I find funny . . . the hypocrisy of some of these religious people. They stand here and say that women should be fully informed before making any decisions because they believe that if women knew more then they would not have abortions. Then the same people say that we should not fully inform our children about sex but rather we should just tell them that it is not right for them or they are too immature. So basically what you are saying is, since informed women are more likely to keep the baby lets inform them, however, since informed teens are more likely to have sex (be it probably in a safer manner) lets not inform them. I am sorry but ignorance is an evil no matter what. Leaving your child without the proper knowledge to make a decision of any kind is a failure of the parent.

    • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 5:51:40 PM

      I agree, and I appreciate the use of the phrase "some of these religious people." We're not all the same. If Cathy Catholic (it's just a name, don't get too offended) wants to teach her child to abstain because it's God's will, then as the mother that is her choice. Ethel Episcopalian chooses a different route and wants full education for her children. Not all religious folks want the gov't in our personal lives, nor do we want our religion in our gov't. I personally think that by denying your child education, you keep them stupid and unsafe. You teach your kids not to run into the street, but won't teach them about how their OWN BODY works? We teach kids about their hearts, and lungs, and how to eat right and exercise to stay healthy. But we shy away from teaching them how to stay reproductively healthy, which IS a part of their health.

  • Posted By: GeorgiaJayhawk @ 01/17/2008 12:06:12 PM

    In response to this post:
    Posted By: lconcepcion @ 01/17/2008 11:26:35 AM
    Comment: To each and every person -myself included- who has ever supported, performed, participated, or helped in any way with the mass killing (1out of every 3 children since 1961) of children through the means of abortion of ANY kind through the use of devices such as IUD, to taking abortion pills, to actually surgical procedures: you are an assassin, a killer, just like a downtown gangster. Please don't lie to yourself. Christ will forgive you.

    Hey, lconcepcion , get your facts straight....the IUD doesn't kill babies, it prevents pregnancies from ever happening. IUD's come in two varieties in the US. One time releases hormone into a women's system (Mirena) and prevents pregnancy much the same way that the pill does, and the other (ParaGuard) has copper on it, and the copper has spermicidal properties. Either the hormone or copper, combined with the actual device, which is thought to prevent implantation, prevents a women from ever getting pregnant, so don't go calling someone a murderer for being smart enough to take preventative measures. As far as why there is a decrease, it is probably a combination of all the factors, limited access to abortion services, better access to preventative measures (birth control, morning after pill). That being said, at the end of the day, even the most careful of us can end up in this predicament. Birth control fails, even with vasectomies and tubal ligations folks still get surprises, it's not because they were irresponsible. It's good to know that I have options, even if I may never use them. Who are you to condemn someone else for the very personal choices they make?

    • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 12:27:43 PM

      Not to negate what you are saying, but it is only true that "the IUD doesn't kill babies, it prevents pregnancies from ever happening" if you believe that life begins at implantation. Conception (sperm and egg meeting) happens before implantation (sometimes a day or two). IUD's prevent the concieved zygote ("little life") from being able to attach to the uterine lining by basically eliminating the lining. They don't allow the blood to get thick enough, which is why many women don't have menstral periods while using an IUD. If you believe that life begins at conception, an IUD is in fact murder.

      • Posted By: GeorgiaJayhawk @ 01/17/2008 12:55:38 PM

        OK, luciefreddie...apparently you are ignorant on the way IUD's work, so let me educate you. The Mirena releases a low dose of the hormone levonorgestrel into a womens system. This hormone does 3 things: 1 it thickens the cervical mucus and prevents the sperm from getting into the uterus, and susquently into the fallopian tubes, 2 it prevents the release of eggs from the ovaries (1 and 2 combines means no comception..so no pregnancy) 3 it has the added bonus of thinner uterine lining, which can result in lighter menstrual cycles.

        The ParaGuard works differently, but is just as effective. ParaGuard contains copper. The copper creates an environment in the uterus that is spermicidal, ie it kills the sperm BEFORE they can reach the fallopian tube and thus the egg (no conception NO PREGNANCY). Paraguard does not cause the uterine lining to become thin...in fact most women have heavier cyles with the device.

        Next time you want to call someone a murderer, even in a cute subtle round about way, DO YOUR HOMEWORK!


        http://www.paragard.com/index.php

        • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 1:16:23 PM

          BTW...I would rather educate myself using information from many venues, than trust one person's brief research. I have done the homework. I have asked Biology professors, doctors, and done intense research on the web. As a young married woman (20 at the time), I had to make a decision of what form of birth control to use. Unfortunately, I was left (actually he) with condoms as the best option. Almost all birth control pills and other forms of contraception mirror early abortions in many ways. I personally can't be ok with taking something if there is even the slightest chance that it will produce the same results as an abortion. If you are considering your options, please do your own research.

          • Posted By: GeorgiaJayhawk @ 01/17/2008 3:19:05 PM

            I've done my research....and I'm willing to wager that I know a great deal more about human biology than you do. That being said, I don't appreciate the insinuation that I'm a murderer because I chose, after long talks with my OBGYN and a lot of literature, following years of Birth control pill use, to get an IUD. An IUD does not equal an abortion.

            • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 6:43:45 PM

              I completely agree...an IUD does not equal abortion. BUT, an IUD can sometimes (most likely less than 5%) lead to the disposal of a concieved zygote. I find it a bit arrogant that you claim to know more about human biology than me. I mean really...you don't know me. Perhaps I am a biology professor...

        • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 1:11:08 PM

          I would encourage women to speak to their doctors directly about how these devices work, not the big money drug company's website. I am pretty against most forms of birth control, because most of them leave the chance of not allowing a concieved fetus to attach. Spermicides have a very low percentage of success--which is why people don't use them alone any more. What happens when the sperm goes through the mucus, the egg makes it into the uterus..granted it is a 10-12 percent chance. Conception is possible, even though it is a low possibility. I would rather have a zero percent chance of killing a child than a 10 percent chance. So yes, I do believe that some IUD users are murderers. I am not trying to make it sound cute or subtle. I think every woman needs to be informed on what they are putting into their bodies. Please keep in mind that I also believe that any man who looks at his brother with hate is a murderer (Matthew); I am not trying to be more "holy" or unforgiving.

  • Posted By: aztecman98 @ 01/17/2008 2:32:21 PM

    Well, why don't we outlaw christianity (mainly Catholic)in this country as well. It has killed FAR more people than abortions ever will! Its even made ancient cultures extinct. All those Spanish running around smoking down the natives of the Americans all in the name of Christ. CONVERT OR DIE was their mantra. How dare you tell others on how to live their lives. How can somebody who's religion has so much blood on its hands convince me that it really cares about the unborn? It can't. Its all about control. Religion has ALWAYS been about control. I hope I may one day see humanity grow out of its 'infancy' and dump these silly dogmas before they kill us all.

    • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 2:51:03 PM

      While I know that this reply will immediately be disregarded, it is important that there is a distinction between Christianity and Christians. Christianity is a religion that has much truth and hope to offer to a dying world in need of a Savior. A Savior that God gladly offered through His Son. Your beef is not with the religion, but with the professing Christians who were either not true converts or who were hypocrites. In reality, all Christians are hypocrites, so I hesitate to use that word. All of us make mistakes and sin. Some have done it falsely in the name of Christianity. I just don't think you can bring down the entire religion because of the actions of some.

      • Posted By: aztecman98 @ 01/17/2008 3:12:51 PM

        no, I appreciate your comment, but throughout the history of the world, All religion has done is divide us, not unite. I understand that most Christians are good people, but the ones with the power dictate how others will see their dogma. Just look at what the catholic church did during WW2. They knew about what the Nazis were doing, just decided that they would not say or do anything about it as it was a 'non-believer issue' Same thing happened in the inquisition, except Catholics led the way on beating down the hebrews and non-believers. Why do you think muslims hate us? Maybe it has something to do with the Crusades?

        • Posted By: luciefreddie @ 01/17/2008 6:38:27 PM

          I appreciate your kind exchange. Unfortunately, I think that Richard Dawkins is correct when he says that atheists are kinder than (professing) Christians. As evidenced by this exchange, many times (professing) Christians are just downright hateful!

        • Posted By: Kinch @ 01/17/2008 3:48:20 PM

          So much to talk about with your comments... Vatican City is less that two tenths of a square mile and in the middle of Italy.... and Mussolini was an Ally to Hitler.... If they were extremely vocal they'd been taken over... and yes they were vocal to the point that there were stand offs... and they did hide Jews in the Vaticans and made some servants in the apartments during the Holocaust.... Many priests also went to concentration camps, not only for helping Jews, but because they were Catholic. England and the US are toblame sure... but the first Catholic US President was JFK and England is obviously not a Catholic country.....But many religions hated the Jews throughout history... not just Cathoics..... S Muslims don't hate us either... extremists do... and they hate everyone who is NOT muslim whether you're Christian, an atheist or buddhist.....

          • Posted By: rangerone314 @ 01/17/2008 4:20:24 PM

            Bringing up the Crusades as a reason for Muslims to hate Christians is stupid. I seem to recall an endless series of military campaigns against Christians (Byzantine Empire) and Persia (pagans)... Egypt, the Levant (Syria, Lebanon, etc) used to be Christian, until the Muslims came in by force and conquered militarily. Seems the Crusades was a REACTION to Muslim aggression. Early Muslim leaders (Mohammed, Abu Bakr) were warlords who waged war. Early Christian leaders/prophets (Christ, Paul), were killed and were pacifists...

            And before you ask... I'm wicca, so I'm not HUGE fan of Christians... just straightening the facts out here

    • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 2:38:26 PM

      What you fail to understand is when "Chirstians" kill in the name of Christ they are only using Christ as an excuse. These people are actually driven by Satan just as PP is when they perform abortions.

      • Posted By: aztecman98 @ 01/17/2008 2:45:40 PM

        actually at that time, The Pope condoned and ordered the killing of non-believers. So I guess you are saying that your 'Church' is in Satan's grasp as well. Look, why don't you mind your own business. Its not up to you to push your dogma or beliefs on others. After all, doesn't your 'book' say, Judge not, lest you be judged???

        • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:48:23 PM

          I made that same comment to some other idiot down on the blog. It's very true but these people only pick and choose what they want to believe from the bible when it suits their purpose or their argument. That's why they are not credible and can't be taken seriously.

          • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 3:10:10 PM

            Where in the bible does it say anything about the Pope condoning killing? It doesn't because it does not even metion a Pope. Maybe you should read the Bible before you start trying to blame things on it. As far a global warming goes that is a religion that is obviously being used to condone killing. Morons like Gore claim they know what is going to happen to our weather 10-15 years from now when they can't even predict what is going to happen tomorrow. That is why one of his speeches had to be canceled due to snow last year.

            • Posted By: aztecman98 @ 01/17/2008 3:19:42 PM

              Hey, I know the bible. 12 years of catholic school. I did not say ANYTHING about the bible condoning the killing, I said the ones in power (pope) condoned the killing. Isn't the pope God's representative on Earth? I think so. I don't believe the global warming hype that much either, but not having ANY controls on population is just asking for trouble. The catholic church constantly gets in the way when it comes to BC in parts of the world that have serious population problems. I guess its ok for someone to die of hunger that to never exist at all.

              • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 5:55:56 PM

                No the Pope is the catholics leader not God's representative. The Pope is human so he is just as likely to be wrong as any other human.

                • Posted By: Bisonberg @ 01/17/2008 6:17:09 PM

                  Actually, according to Catholics, the Pope is God's voice on earth and as such, infallible. So, if you're Catholic, you believe that the Pope is incapable of error.

        • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 2:54:54 PM

          First of all I am not judging anybody. I am merely stating my opinion that abortion is murder. Secondly, I am not a Catholic but I am pretty sure the current pope was not the same guy who condoned those killings. Just because someone is elevated to the papacy does not mean he cannot be corrupted by Satan. So yes at that time Satan was influencing the church just as he has influenced many of the clergy that have been committing pedophilia recently. The thing is we recognize those things to be wrong. ProAbortionist do not recognize that what they are supporting is morally corrupt. One day in the future are descendants will look back on them with the same disgust that we all now have for those murderers you point out.

          • Posted By: mrsavizdrav @ 01/17/2008 3:13:50 PM

            OK, Catholic curch recognizes pedophilia is wrong, pays hundreds of millions of $ to the victims, moves the pedophile prists to different new places, and everything is fine!?!?!?

          • Posted By: aztecman98 @ 01/17/2008 3:02:15 PM

            well, I hope there will be future generations, because if all the Global warming stuff is true. Abortion may become the norm. With what scientists are saying today, I doubt there will be enough food to support 8 billion of us, probably closer to 2 billion. So, by not making abortion and BC available, we are just dooming them to starve! Which is worse??? But I bet, once again, that religion will probably make that moot and just be the end of all of us.

      • Posted By: saber_77 @ 01/17/2008 3:21:02 PM

        I had an abortion 10 years ago and I do not regret it. I was 24 years old halfway across the United States from my family, who I was estranged from. I was in a long-term relationship with a man who was Bi-Polar (found out later). Due to his and his families "issues" we became homeless. We ended up living in a tent. I had a job, a car, and still no one would help me. I tried to get a low income apartment, but was told I made to much money! I was homeless and yet they would not help me! I went to the Welfare who told me I'm sorry there's nothing we can do for you. They made me feel dirty, cheap, and as if just wanted a handout. She told me that if got pregnant she could help me! At the time, I didn???t know that I already was pregnant. I was, 24, homeless, pregnant, no family, no help and with a boyfriend who was becoming violent. When I found out I cried. Now I had that to worry about. I didn???t tell anyone. I was terrified. My mother was diabetic and was told not to have children, especially after having my sister. It made her condition worse. She became pregnant with me on purpose and hid it. Doctors told her to get an abortion or die, eventually from the consequences. Guess what? She did die, but not until she spent the next 17 years ( I know that???s a long time, but most of it was in a hospital bed) trying to recover and never did. Half of the year at least. I found out early that I had the same problems as my mother. I can have children, but it will be very hard on me as well. I do not want to be in the hospital and go through that. It terrifies me, but I don???t want to never have a child. That is why I have not had my tubes tied. I make to much money for government assistance, but not enough to have insurance to help cover expenses. So when I was 24 managed to ride a bus 5 hours to a clinic on the outskirts of Seattle and have an abortion. I had to walk into a clinic hating what I was doing and knowing it was my only choice. After spending all that time on the bus thinking and knowing I had to walk past lines of picketers calling me a murderer, baby killer, and things almost as bad. They got up so close to me I could smell their breath as they tossed insults at me. I hate the narrow-mindedness of so many people (not all) in regards to this. Stop yelling at us that it's against God. He knows the positions we were in and what we were going through. He is the only person who has the right to judge us! If he is such a forgiving God than he already know and has. Please never say a woman does not have the right to choose and that she is a murderer. I wish I could have had my baby, but there was no way for me to do so. I do not regret what I did, for me it was the only choice. I know some of you will say I could have done this or that and not an abortion.You don't know. You weren???t there. Please don't judge. Just be happy that fewer and fewer people have to be put in that situation do to the new medicines and options that are availa

        • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 3:33:16 PM

          saber_77 - I'm there with you my friend. I know your pain. I also know that you made a choice that you had to make for yourself. You were courageous in your fear and did what you knew was best for you. We as women have this extra burden for some reason.....that we have to do what is right for everyone else....that somehow we have to be selfless and sacrifice for the good of others. It's not so, we need to take care of ourselves or we are no good to other people. I commend you and I stand by your decision and I defend it. Please know there are many many women and men who stand by you and defend your right.

          • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 5:53:21 PM

            Come on. If you knew you were going to be in danger if you had a kid why did you take the chance in the first place. Was your 5 minutes of self gratification worth the so called misery you went through to get an abortion? I think you are full of crap and made that whole story up. If not you are not a very bright person for putting yourself in that situation to begin with. When will you people learn a little self control?

      • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:46:20 PM

        Oh, there's a good one!!! Keep drinking that kool-aid.

    • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:41:40 PM

      iI's a good point you make aztecman98 and I'm Catholic. Christianity certainly has no room to talk with all the atrocities that have been committed in the name of GOD over the centuries.

  • Posted By: peace and love @ 01/17/2008 1:20:47 PM

    It's not as if PP is running around forcing people to have abortions. Their profit is a direct result of how many women that they helped. Thank you PP.

    • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 1:43:34 PM

      No, but they do have a vested interest in making sure as many people as possible have an abortion vs. the adoption route. That is why they hate the abstinence programs so much. They do not have a chance at making a profit if these young girls stop having sex.

      • Posted By: Bisonberg @ 01/17/2008 6:29:37 PM

        I'm sure the fact the abstinence programs have an extremely low success rate has nothing to do with their opposition, huh?

  • Posted By: FeddieChick @ 01/17/2008 11:13:12 AM

    In which verse of the bible does God say abortion is murder? I'd really like to know so I can read it for myself.

    • Posted By: jordanandsarahsmom @ 01/17/2008 11:39:14 AM

      It says abortion is murder where it says that the taking of innocent life is Murder. There is a difference between killing and murder. I can say that floating around in the womb minding your own business sucking your thumb and playing with your little toes is as innocent as it gets. Being ripped from the womb and chopped to pieces because you are an inconvenience is evil and cruel.

      • Posted By: Bisonberg @ 01/17/2008 6:26:35 PM

        If you believe in the concept of original sin, which Christians do, then no fetus can be considered "innocent" until it has been baptized.

  • Posted By: Tracker500 @ 01/17/2008 1:45:25 PM

    "Why is it disgusting for PP to turn a profit but if it's an OB/GYN at a hospital that is okay?"

    LOL. Your're funny. While most hospitals are on the verge of bankruptcy, Planned Parenthood is reaping approximately $1 billion annually. That's nine zeroes. The more abortions, the bigger the profit. Encouraging abortions is in their best interest, just as making people feel like they are sick boosts sale for the pharma industry. No one is saying PP is entitled to making money, but tell the truth. It is a money-making machine which exploits young, vulnerable women.

    • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 2:01:12 PM

      I pose the same question to you then. Why oh why oh why does PP continue to offer contraceptive services? Seems to me that defeats their purpose, if the real money is in abortion then logic would be to fight AGAINST contraception not for it. Guess PP is being run by better business minds than most hospitals, maybe they should take some notes.

      • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 2:32:44 PM

        PP fights for contraception because as you have stated on this thread over and over again IT DOESNT ALWAYS WORK. They want women to think contraceptives will protect them so they will continue to have meaningless sex. That gives the contraceptive a better chance of failing thus producing an unwanted pregnancy thus producing an opportunity for an abortion thus increasing their profit. FOLLOW? I know it is confusing for someone that is controlled by their genitals but hopefully I typed slowly enough for you to comprehend.

        • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:57:23 PM

          Ok rs1234.....what is meaningless sex???? Please tell me? And while you are at it, please tell me what's meaningful sex? And while you are at that, please tell me who gets to make the decision what is meaningful sex and what isn't....YOU???? You show your ignorance.

          • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 4:14:36 PM

            You call me ignorant because I know the difference between meaningful and meaningless sex??? I think you just displayed the definition of ignorance.

            • Posted By: Bisonberg @ 01/17/2008 6:21:01 PM

              What on earth is wrong with you? You arbitrarily decide to separate sexual activity into two categories, fail to define those categories, and then have the nerve to call someone else ignorant? Hilarious.

        • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 3:36:20 PM

          So PP promotes prevention of pregnancy in an attempt to get women (because men have nothing to do with any of this really) to have lots of promiscuous sex in the HOPES that the prevention will fail and thus lead to an abortion. Whereas abstinence only education, of course, ensures that people do not have sex. On a side note, you can toss all the insults you want my direction (ie being led by my genitals) but it really speaks about your debate and not mine. I don't need to throw insults at you, my debate is sound.

      • Posted By: Tracker500 @ 01/17/2008 2:47:15 PM

        bethyb,
        That's like saying just because the beer companies placed drink responsibly ads on televsion that they don't want to maximize beer sales. You know that is ludicrous.

  • Posted By: isis5632 @ 01/17/2008 9:22:51 AM

    I think a point a lot of people are missing is the availability of pregnancy calendars and the like on the internet, it makes the pregnancy more real because you are informed about the growth of the fetus/baby and it makes it harder on your conscience to abort when you know the heart is beating at 5-6 weeks. But I would not outlaw abortion, throughout history, when women are pregnant with a child they dont want they will do anything to end the pregnancy, if there is a medically safe way to do it, that should be her choice. I personally got pregnant at 19, finished college (while on welfare and food stamps for a year) and worked my way through grad school, we need to stop treating teenage pregnancy as the end of a girls life, besides, medically, 18-24 is the optimal time for child bearing.

    • Posted By: girlpower! @ 01/17/2008 10:23:07 AM

      Who says that 18- 24 is the optimal time for child bearing? Many people are not financily or emotionally ready to be a parent at that age. Just because a female menstrates doesn't mean she is ready to have a baby.

      • Posted By: isis5632 @ 01/17/2008 2:13:33 PM

        Obviously you missed the word MEDICALLY. There are other factors including finances and emotional maturity, but any way you cut it, our bodies were made to have children in early adulthood. The media (and feminists) have tricked women into believing they can postpone childbearing until their late thirties to pursue a career and there are no consequenses for this. A womens's fertility drops five percent a year from 25-30 and the percentage drop accelerates rapidly after that. You have a five % chance of conceiving naturally at 40. Older women are more likely to have gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre term births, biirth defects etc. I feel one reason we are seeing an explosion in autism is because women are giving birth with old eggs, you are born with all the eggs you are going to have at birth, dont you want to use them while they are fresh? Its funny how generations before us were able to have babies at this age and survived emotionally and financially. We have become such as selfish and self absorbed society with extended childhoods and delayed maturation of our youth. This is a conversation we are just not having and I think it is a diservice to women.

        • Posted By: Potion78 @ 01/17/2008 6:05:41 PM

          Okay... So if a woman waits to have sex and lets says she isn't married by the age of 30 her baby is going to have some sort of birth defect because she didn't strap a man down to a bed and settle for what she can get? I'm not going to claim to be a medical expect but I'll take my chances and wait for a responsible adult before I decide to kick caution to the wind an pro-create to ensure egg freshness. I have to say I never laugh so hard in my life.

  • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 9:05:36 AM

    This is good news regardless of the side you fall on. Teen birth rates being up, not so good news BUT the choice is theirs and they have to make the choice that is right for them. I hate to be the logical one here, but saying just don't get pregnant until you are ready is, well, frankly it's ignorant. Life is not perfect, contraception can and does fail, and rape unfortunately happens. Unintended pregnancies have always occurred and will always occur, that's reality. Women fought long and hard for the RIGHT to determine their own medical and health risks, and the idea that this is in danger now is disgusting. Like it or not, pregnancy is very much a health risk. If you've given birth, then you should be WELL educated on the risks involved, and a woman should choose if she is or is not willing to take that risk. Abortion rates dropping, that's outstanding, the less it is needed the happier everyone is. Eliminating that option altogether, that's ignorant. Until it is your life at risk, it is simply not your choice to make. As it stands right now, there is NOTHING that is 100% effective in preventing unintended pregnancy, and I seriously doubt there will be in any of our lifetimes. I hope that some day all women will have access to quality medical care within their area so that they can make informed decisions that are right for them. And on a side note, abstinence only education is a joke. Hundreds of years of people trying to prevent teen sex and unwed sex have failed at every turn. Education is the best prevention available

    • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 11:26:19 AM

      Abstinence is 100% effective! Everyone that I know who is pro-life agree rape is one of the few exceptions even though it is still not the child???s fault and is morally wrong.

      • Posted By: Potion78 @ 01/17/2008 5:47:41 PM

        I agree rs1234. Abstinence is 100% effective in a relationship between two people who do not want to have children and are not ready to make a commitment to one another, but also I agree with blue_rylie. Our educational system can???t be one sided on this issue. There are many Christian that commit sins everyday and they are not one bit fazed by ???Because! God told you not to do it???. I am abstaining from sex until I???m married. I would not have made this decision if I wasn???t given the pros and cons of sex and felt I was being manipulated to go way or the other. Funding for sex education programs should encompass every aspect of sex from our conception to death and it shouldn???t stop at high-school or virginity pledge. There so many women (and men) that are more confused about menopause than about the option they have when dealing with a pregnancy. Inferior sex education allows women and men to elect poor decisions when it comes to their bodies and sex.

    • Posted By: mrsavizdrav @ 01/17/2008 9:49:17 AM

      Very good comment. I totaly agree with you.

  • Posted By: Highlandpark @ 01/17/2008 4:53:11 PM

    It's the continuing empowerment of women that is causing the decline in abortions. This is something pro-life advocates would not agree with. Providing women with the resources they need to deal effectively with their own lives, such as education and choices, puts them in control and allows them to understand there are alternatives to abortion without condemnation. Ironically, it is the right to choose which causes the decline. There seems to be a camp which is not sophisticated enough to understand this. Pro-choice begets trust begets empowerment begets life. Simple.

    • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 5:25:31 PM

      Give me a break the woman has had the power all along. Just refuse to have sex! That is the biggest power in this debate. Just say NO! Sound familiar?

      • Posted By: Highlandpark @ 01/17/2008 5:45:58 PM

        This is the condemnation I am referring to. Remember what trust begets. Maintaining the chain removes the religious fodder. But first, get rid of the anger.

      • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 5:42:26 PM

        Sex as a weapon, the basis of every loving relationship. I'm so relieved my marriage isn't about control or dominance, it's about mutual respect and sharing and love. The old line of women having all the power by cutting off the sex is ... well, old. And it has never worked.

    • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 4:59:27 PM

      Excellent point!!

  • Posted By: georgiagranny @ 01/17/2008 4:45:46 PM

    This should send lots of you over the edge - a novel ideal - just don't have sex then you don't have to worry about any of the associated problems. Sex is NOT a recreational activity. It was established to be a bond of love between a husband and wife and meant for procreation of life. It is special and beautiful. Have more respect for yourself. I know it works because early on when I was young I had a set of rules for myself and didn't violate them. Today, 50 years later I 'm happy, have wonderful kids that I wanted and am healthy and free of regrets and diseases.

    • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 4:50:16 PM

      I'm glad you made such admirable choices, and choices that were right for you. That does not mean they are right for everyone. I don't buy shoes without trying them on first, and I hope I don't need to finish that analogy. Even if waiting for marriage is the right choice for a person, being married does not automatically equate to being ready or even wanting to have children. Married women can and do abort.

      • Posted By: joanneroy @ 01/17/2008 5:22:49 PM

        Hopefully all those "shoes" you are trying on aren't infected with fungi if you know what I mean. Love, devotion and compassion for one another is what creates sexual compatibility, not necessarily practice or experience. But ultimately, that is your decision.

        • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 5:43:59 PM

          I have tried on a lot more shoes than I have men. It's an analogy, not to be taken too literally. A person can be in a long term committed relationship without having the legal license of marriage. Thank you for your concern, and I agree that each has to decide for themselves and ALL should be educated and safe.

      • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 5:29:07 PM

        If you cannot have a meaningful relationship with a person without having sex then what will you do when the sex drive is gone? Or the man can no longer perform? Get a divorce?

        • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 5:40:23 PM

          Again you assume so much. Who said I would leave? Who said that is what I base the relationship on? Like it or not, sex is a part of the relationship, but only a part. Don't jump ahead too far, you might find you go right off a cliff

    • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 4:57:43 PM

      who said sex is just for married people and only to procreate.....you some bible written by a bunch of men??? You just can't force everyone in a society to accept that principle. If it works for some people that's great but it's ridiculous to assume that concept is true for all nor should it be. Quite frankly, I agree with blue_rylie...I wouldn't marry anyone unless I was sexually compatable with that person and after that I wouldn't want to spend the next 25 years of my life in a constant state of pregnancy because somebody said sex was only for procreation. I'm sure glad most people don't believe that!!! LOL!!!

  • Posted By: kenewton @ 01/17/2008 3:47:23 PM

    No one has the right to impose their will, religion, or morality on someone else.

    No one has the right to enter my house and steal my things. No one has the right to use foul language in front of my 3 year old. No one has the right to have sex at will, get on the government welfare system and get free money. No one has the right to impose sickness on others by going to work, school, church and other places while sick. It happens both ways.

    • Posted By: rs1234 @ 01/17/2008 5:30:17 PM

      No one has the right to kill someone, yet the abortionist do it everyday.

  • Posted By: meno1 @ 01/17/2008 11:41:30 AM

    Religious fanatic freaks please leave your pathetic comments elsewhere. Stop trying to push your brainwashed dogma on people with intelligent minds that enjoy thinking for themselves rather than have some freako preist/pastor/rev. that likes to fondle little boys tell them what to do and that they are born in sin! As if a baby could be born in sin. Obviously birth control is the way to go if youre sexually active but people make mistakes and abortion needs to be there as a choice. Should it be used as birth control, no.

    • Posted By: Cecile @ 01/17/2008 5:26:12 PM

      And abortion should not be used to correct a mistake.

    • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:01:49 PM

      I NEED SOME HELP WITH THIS ONE. YOU SAID "PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES AND ABORTION NEEDS TO BE THERE AS A CHOICE" THEN YOU GO ON TO SAY "SHOULD IT BE USED AS BIRTH CONTROL, NO." WHICH ONE IS IT? IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR STATEMENTS ARE CONFLICTING. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION. SIGNED AN INTELLIGENT CHRISTIAN.

      • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 01/17/2008 12:29:23 PM

        I'll step in here. "Birth control" is practiced before the fact, i.e. as a preventive measure. Abortion is available for those times when birth control fails (or when the participants have been bombarded with politico-religious BS like "abstinence-only 'education'" and are therefore ignorant of birth control). The point those on the lunatic-right choose to ignore is that those of us who are pro-choice want abortion to remain available, safe, and RARE.

        • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:59:36 PM

          Hey Dave I'm not a lunatic and I'm much more more in the center then the left or right, but killing a unborn child just because it's inconvenient is just wrong and you can rename it whatever you want but it is a form of birth control.
          Did you know that 9 out of 10 pregnancy's are terminated when a diagnosis of Downs Syndrome is presented that doesn't seem to RARE to me.

          • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 01/17/2008 1:18:10 PM

            First, your opinions are valid, to the extent to which you recognize them as such (e.g. abortion is wrong). Stating that "abortion is birth control" is just a misstatement of fact. It's only such when it's intended as such - otherwise it's not a preventive measure, but a measure, as I noted, taken after the fact. Finally, whatever the (uncited) source for your statistic, it has no bearing on the FACT that supporters of choice WANT abortion to be rare (i.e. we want viable alternatives to be available). That you don't seize on that bit of common ground says much about your intentions in participating in this discussion.

            • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 2:19:32 PM

              SO THERE ARE NO MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT MY INTENT AND AS FOR US FINDING A COMMON GROUND. I THINK HAVING AN ABORTION SOLELY BECAUSE THE BABY WILL AFFECT ONES pLIFESTYLE IS WRONG AND SHOULD BE ILLEGAL. WHETHER OR NOT THAT DECISION IS PREORDAINED OR NOT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER. ONCE AGAIN YOUR ARE ARGUING SEMANTICS. "BIRTH CONTROL" OR "MEASURE" THE END RESULT IS THE SAME, THE BABY IS PREVENTED FROM BEING BORN.
              AS FOR THE RARE COMMENT IF I AM TO BELIEVE A PREVIOUS POST PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALONE PERFORMED 264,943 ABORTIONS IN 2006. THAT'S NOT RARE.
              PS- MY STATISTICS CAME FROM THE NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS. BUT YOU CAN ALSO DO A WEB SEARCH ON ABORTIONS AND DOWN SYNDROME AND READ ALL ABOUT IT.

              • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 01/17/2008 2:31:04 PM

                No need to shout, NNCMPP - I don't recall anyone saying abortions should be performed only out of concern for one's "lifestyle" other than insofar as some are undoubtedly performed because the person's lifestyle would be harmful to the baby in utero and afterward. I also object that the difference between intending abortion as a preventive measure rather than as a last resort following an unintended pregnancy is "semantic." You appear to be ignoring the distinction intentionally for the sake of making your point. You also seem to be intentionally ignoring my statement that those who favor choice WANT abortions to be rare, and instead conflate that statement with the statement that abortions ARE rare (which would be a matter of opinion). I think I speak for virtually all who favor choice by saying that abortions should be rarer than they are, a position that does not appear to be shared by those on the right, who keep pushing abstinence-only "education," which is as sure a guarantee as there is that abortions will be more common than either of us would prefer. Can you take a deep breath and turn off your "Caps Lock" now?

    • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 11:54:30 AM

      MENO01,
      I NEED HELP WITH THIS ONE. YOU SAID "PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES AND ABORTION NEEDS TO BE THERE AS A CHOICE" THEN YOU GO ON TO SAY "SHOULD IT BE USED AS BIRTH CONTROL, NO." WHICH ONE IS IT? YOUR SECOND STATEMENT SEEMS TO REVERSE YOUR FIRST. SIGNED AN INTELLIGENT CHRISTIAN

      • Posted By: sweetivory @ 01/17/2008 12:09:21 PM

        abortion is not a form of birth control, its an option when birth control fails. get over it.

        • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:40:15 PM

          Ok, lets try this again. Whether you use birth control on the front end or have an abortion on the back end you have controlled the birth of that child.

    • Posted By: Ithink4myself @ 01/17/2008 11:50:56 AM

      meno1: Brainwashing dogma? Your comment is laughable. The only brainwashing here is what comes from the left. You are afraid to look at the facts. Observe the remains of an aborted fetus. Look at the face, hands, fingernails. It's all there, if "they" got the whole body. Body is the key word. It's the body of a living human being. (or was, anyway). That's real. That's fact. Your dogma is, it's not a living being you are killing. Do some research on abortion. Not Planned Parenthood's version. Then you can make an informed decision.

      • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 01/17/2008 12:30:35 PM

        It's laughable to pretend that religious opinions are not dogma, while scientific fact is. Then again, those who are raised on dogma are unable to grasp the distinction.

  • Posted By: breath @ 01/17/2008 5:18:56 PM

    Comment: Ps to my account here the author did experience the rape of his own child...so again... I think it would be informational for many of your readers here to have the opportunity to read Francis Collin's book, (Francis is head of the Human Genome project, with over a 1000 geneticists under him) His book is titled The Language of God and offers a common ground for scientists and believers to MEET. Francis is a believer in Jesus Christ and believes abortion is wrong. He presents discussion regarding bio-ethics which applies not only to abortion but insight into today's just released news regarding cloning, (which by the way is not cloning of a concieved child but a mix of skin cell DNA and an unfertilized egg minus it's nucleus-. I believe todays news regarding these abortion statistics is a result of this current generations changing morality. These 20 somethings are a very moral generation and choose life over death. We will all be surprised at the choices, kind, informed and educated choices they make. These young upcoming scientists will find solutions which help all. Yes their is great heartache all around...we need to link up better those paying 50,000 for a baby to adopt with the desperate-(sometimes older) women who find themselves with an unwanted pregnacy. Love covers over so many things. We need to love one another and help one another find good solutions to the pain each finds themselves experiencing. With these thoughts know that many just like me will be marching to repeal roe vs wade (the supreme court abortion law) next week. Remember we are not your enemy... but are trying to help each woman make wise, informed decisions. The fact is...we would like to help and not hurt you.

  • Posted By: Gwyneth30 @ 01/17/2008 5:13:43 PM

    I think everyone should be happy that abortion rates are down. The day anyone has an abortion is not a happy day. The bottom line is that it does end a life, no matter how many studies experts do to try to pinpoint a "startdate" for life to justify doing it. Just because its an option, and some women choose to do it, doesn't mean that women skip to the clinic with smiles on their faces. It's a hard decision to make. And I am really sicked at some comments here from people that are supposedly pro-life, yet insinuating that some people on here, because they don't like their comments, should have been aborted. Really immature.

  • Posted By: nycgirl @ 01/17/2008 11:53:32 AM

    I have no regrets about mine, and I am a financially successful young woman with loving relationship with a man who was willing to marry her and raise the child. I am glad I had the choice, for a baby would have ruined my life.

    • Posted By: Cecile @ 01/17/2008 12:18:13 PM

      :How sad for you, you sound like a very selfish and greedy little human being. You needed worry about a child ruining your life it sounlds like your doing a good job yourself.

      • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 1:00:10 PM

        Who are you to say that a woman is selfish or greedy....that's your opinion based on your values. Don't go shoving your beliefs and values down other people's throats. A woman is not selfish or greedy when she makes decisons that benefit herself.....men makes those decisons all the time in their lives.

        • Posted By: Cecile @ 01/17/2008 5:10:18 PM

          Oh you mean a woman is not selfish or greedy if she murders her child, to be financially well off. What horrible mentatity.

        • Posted By: vince.stewart @ 01/17/2008 1:26:51 PM

          Do you hate men or something?
          GEEZE

          • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:24:53 PM

            No I'm just making comparisons. Are you afraid of the truth??? You know it's been less than 100 years since women were finally given the right to vote due to them being seen as less capable than men. A person of the male gender really has no right to make any comments on something that he will never have to make a decision about. Unfortunately, men have been trying to control women, their lives and their reproduction for centuries and fortunately in the last 100 years women have made tremendous strides to stop it. Hopefully, women will continue to be the ones who make the decisions about their lives and not religious zealots with the help of our government.

    • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:23:57 PM

      YOU MIGHT BE FINANCIALLY SUCCESSFUL BUT YOU ARE CLEARLY MORALLY BANKRUPT!

      • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 12:57:08 PM

        No you are clearly morally bankrupt for sticking your nose into someone else's life.

        • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 1:09:16 PM

          I didn't stick my nose into her life. She laid her decision out on a blog for everyone to comment on.

          • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 2:19:54 PM

            You're in no position to judge someone else.....that's your problem. What's the old saying....judge not lest you be judged. Good advise I would say.

            • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 2:44:26 PM

              ACTUALLY I AM IN THAT POSITION. OUR FIRST BORN HAS DOWN SYNDROME AND WE COULD HAVE CHOSEN TO HAD AN ABORTION, WE CERTAINLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT, AND IT WOULD HAVE CERTAINLY MADE PARTS OF OUR LIFE A LOT EASIER. WE HOWEVER DECIDED OBSERVE THE SANCTITY OF LIFE AND HAD THE CHILD AND HAVE NEVER REGRETTED IT FOR A MINUTE. I THINK THERE ARE CLEARLY SOME ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE DISCUSSED AND DEBATED AND WHETHER OR NOT WE KILL UNBORN BABIES BECAUSE IT IS NOT CONVENIENT FOR US IS ONE OF THOSE ISSUES.

              • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 3:05:42 PM

                Wow!! You've just made my point. You CHOSE to bring a Dow's Syndrome child into the world and take care of him/her. That's commendable. The point is you made the choice. You see you are in no position to judge another person for the decisions they make in their lives. You just aren't no matter how many capital letters you use at me to make your point. You have no right to judge...you have no right to stick you nose in someone else's life and make decisions for them. It's just unfortunate for you that you don't understand. I'm sure you wouldn't want someone else to make decisons about your family and your life so don't assume you have the right to make those decisons for other people.

                • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 4:00:09 PM

                  My point is that terminating a pregnancy because it's not what you want is wrong! Sorry you missed the point. I have read quite a few of your other comments and I see that you are all about "your body/your rights" which would be fine if it was only about your body. I think the government regulations on self preservation much to intrusive. Unfortunately its not only about your body when your pregnant its now about the baby you have conceived and I believe the government as well as individuals should have the right to comment on how that baby is treated.

                  • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 4:12:25 PM

                    I disagree with you.....as long as the fetus is dependent on the woman to live the woman's life is paramount. Once the fetus is capable of living outside of the womb than certain considerations have to be given to that life. If your neighbor couldn't live without life support should he be hooked up to you so you can sustain his life? If you say no well then why not? He deserves to live just as much as you do. You have the ability to allow him to survive so morally speaking he should be hooked up to you so he can continue to live. You should have no say in the decision. The government should make that decision. As long as a fetus cannot sustain its own life, it's part of the woman's body. Once the fetus can sustain its life than restrictions should be placed on abortion but still the woman's life is paramount and any threat to her life and/or health should constitute consideration of any abortion.

    • Posted By: kenewton @ 01/17/2008 2:45:32 PM

      It's really not about YOUR life. If you throw a rock through a window......it's going to break. Real character reveals itself in the aftermath.

    • Posted By: mtthw @ 01/17/2008 12:01:31 PM

      nycgirl??? Please lets not ruin your life lets kill another so you may live free from anything that may put a cramp in you financually successful life. Please keep you legs closed we don't need anymore selfish idiots like you running around.

      • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 1:01:20 PM

        Again men make those decisions every single day. Perhaps men need to keep their pants on. HUH

    • Posted By: dancingdiamonds4 @ 01/17/2008 12:56:28 PM

      nycgirl - I support your decision...it was the right decision for you at that particular time in your life. For someone other woman it may not be. That's what is meant by freedom of chioice. I too terminate a pregnancy. I did so on my doctor's advice and not because my life was in danger. I could have chosen to continue the pregnancy but I did not and it was the best decision for me at the time. My point is....these decisions need to be made by the woman in consultation with her family and her doctor and no other person has any right to make that decision. As long as the means of women's reproduction remains out of her control she will be deminished in society and have less rights than her male counterpart. Having control of your reproduction brings greater equality and a greater standard of living to all women in our country.

    • Posted By: mtthw @ 01/17/2008 12:19:33 PM

      You need to think about suicide hon:) Everyytime you look into that childs eyes think about the one you killed. Don't worry you wont be missed.

      • Posted By: Angmarie74 @ 01/17/2008 12:53:14 PM

        Maybe you should rethink you statement! Suicide.....and you won't be missed!!! WTF, you sound like an idiot! Do you think it was an easy choice for her? I'm sure it wasn't, but.....IT'S A CHOICE, and a right!! You should ask God to forgive you!! If you're a pro-lifer, you just made yourself look like a hypocrite with a suicide statement!! Good for this woman to know that she wasn't ready tp be a mother and to be brave enough to say it, do it and know that it was the best decision for her! I'm sure she's dealt with her decision in her own way and could really care less what you think. You really have no F%#(*Ng clue and come across very narrow minded!! But, like they say opinions are like *** everybody has one! Maybe you should keep yours to yourself! You're just a rude, judgmental, and ignorant human being. You are no better than anyone else! I'm sure you have your skeletons, most people just won't ever admit them. Maybe you should do some closet cleaning, share it with the world and if we don't agree with what you've done....well then, I'm sure you won't be missed!

      • Posted By: vince.stewart @ 01/17/2008 12:31:55 PM

        What??!??
        That is uncalled for!

      • Posted By: vince.stewart @ 01/17/2008 12:25:31 PM

        That is uncalled for!

      • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:23:04 PM

        WOW SUICIDE! WHAT SICK THING TO SAY!

    • Posted By: dsherbourne @ 01/17/2008 12:29:36 PM

      Unfortunatley, women feel that they need to be financially successfull to be accepted as a "contributing member of society" in today's culture. If babies were seen as what they are, a gift, not a burden, then the woman bringing the baby into the world would not be seen as a burden that she must make sure does not "burden society", nor would her baby. Things were not much different in acient times, people who worshiped the pagan god Molech would sacrifice there children by burning them to death inorder to gain financial prosperity from their god.....

    • Posted By: rantochy @ 01/17/2008 12:12:23 PM

      You are unbelievibly selfish young women who has no idea what in the world you are saying or aparently doing. you decided not to take responsibility for a child that you carelessly conceived with someone you were not even married to and then could have decided to marry the man and raise your child as a responsible adult would surely had done, but that would have ruined your life. You call yourself a successful women. You have know idea what a successful women is and I doubt if you ever will.

    • Posted By: NCPOMP @ 01/17/2008 12:09:36 PM

      YOU MIGHT BE FINANCIALLY SUCCESSFUL BUT YOUR CLEARLY MORALLY BANKRUPT! PS YOU CAN'T TO IT WITH YOU.

    • Posted By: telicity @ 01/17/2008 12:04:34 PM

      What a horrid person you must be!

  • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 3:16:15 PM

    ithink4myself Actually, since you seemed to think my mother is prochoice (and was using contraception that failed) I will clarify for you. BOTH of my mothers are prochoice. Yes, I said both. I am adopted. My biological mom didn't think abortion was right for her, she thought adoption was the right choice for her, but she remains prochoice and doesn't think she can tell other women what to do. My adoptive mom, unable to have children herself, is clearly and advocate of adoption but does not think that means every woman has to make that choice nor does she think that children are an entitlement or that sterile couples *deserve* kids via adoption from other women. She also thinks that women need to make their own choices. Care to assume anything else? Since we're there, I'll save you the time. I'm prochoice, a mother of 3 children all born in wedlock, a military wife, and a Christian. Don't assume you know, because clearly you do not

    • Posted By: Ithink4myself @ 01/17/2008 4:49:41 PM

      Well, the good news for you is that your birth mother made the "choice" for life. She could easily have chosen to abort you. Then you would not have had the chance to have those children and be that military wife. I do question those you calls themselves Christian and think that destroying a human life is justified. Your hostility towards me is misplaced. I choose not to tell others what to do, but simply choose to express how I strongly I feel about protecting the unborn as well the handicapped, elderly, animals and any others that cannot protect themselves.

      • Posted By: blue_rylie @ 01/17/2008 5:02:33 PM

        I have no hostility towards you in any way. I do, however, like to be clear about what is going on, assumptions serve no good purpose so I like to do away with them quickly. I am ALL FOR your right to voice your opinion, I am not looking to ban prolife protests or education or any other function prolifers or anyone else chooses to participate in. Freedom of speech and our ability to sit here and disagree with each other is what makes all of us think a little harder and dig a little deeper. That goes for both sides, both you and I.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse