"The talks are long overdue. The release of Aung San Suu Kyi and the other political prisoners is long overdue. Those are also the best way to avoid more sanctions."
What exactly does Gambari mean by saying that?? does he mean Daw Aung San Suu Kyi have to house arrested all da time???
F**k UN, F**K China...all only rely on bullsh!t.....
We Don’t Do ‘Regime Change’
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
Aren't you worried about looking soft on an international pariah?
No. Either you change the regime or you change the behavior of the regime. I don't have the instruments to change the regime. So if you want to change the behavior of a regime, what do you do? You have to talk.
So are you setting any deadlines for talks?
The talks are long overdue. The release of Aung San Suu Kyi and the other political prisoners is long overdue. Those are also the best way to avoid more sanctions.
Have sanctions worked at all?
Maybe so, maybe not. But if they are combined with real engagement and with some incentives at the appropriate time, they could work.
The junta argues that it is progressing with its "Seven-Point Roadmap." Do you agree?
You can't have a roadmap to democracy that excludes the [opposition's National League for Democracy]. The first step was the national convention, which took 14 years, but they're finished. The next is the constitutional drafting committee, which they have established. The people of Myanmar [Burma], the neighboring countries and the world can't wait another 14 years for the next step.
Many activists say that's not enough.
I was designated special envoy working on this matter only last May. May! This thing's been going on for decades. My predecessor was not allowed in the country for two and a half years. The special rapporteur for human rights was not allowed in for four and a half years. So we're not celebrating, but even if you're not satisfied, what is the alternative? The U.N. is not in the business of changing regimes. What we have the capacity for and the mandate for is to change the behavior of the regime. That's why we have consultations with all the key actors: China, India, ASEAN countries, the United States, the European Union, Japan, Australia.
What are the attitudes of those actors?
If there's any unanimity, it's in support of the secretary-general's office. All of them.









Discuss