The Great Moqtada Makeover
American commanders hope they can turn Sadr's Shiite supporters the same way they have former Sunni insurgents.
In the West Baghdad neighborhood of Hurriya, 25-year-old Saif Awad was known as "the Assassin." He didn't look like a killer. Handsome and well groomed, Awad made a show of attending prayers and Shiite religious celebrations. But, locals say, he also ran a brutal kidnapping ring linked to Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army and shook down newcomers to Hurriya—even other Shiites—for protection money. In recent months he'd taken to wearing flashier clothes and flaunting his two new cars. He was driving one of them to the shop last November when three men on motorcycles roared up and riddled the Toyota with bullets, killing Awad. An eyewitness, who asked to remain anonymous for his own safety, says the killers were fellow members of the Mahdi Army. "Death is the punishment for those who disobey the Mahdi Army," says Bassim Abdul Zahra, a Hurriya resident close to the militia. "By killing these dissenters, the leadership sends a warning."
Gen. David Petraeus has been deservedly praised for tamping down violence in Iraq, but an unlikely character deserves some credit—Sadr. Five months ago the firebrand cleric ordered his followers to lay down their arms, and they've largely obeyed. Mahdi cadres have gone after bad seeds like the Assassin, whose thuggish tactics have disgusted ordinary Iraqis. American officers now talk about "splitting the seams" within the Shiite militia—working with moderates in the group to isolate the radicals, similar to the strategy adopted to tame the Sunni insurgency.
U.S. commanders are engaged in talks with the Shiite militants for the first time since 2003. In public statements the Americans are careful to distinguish between the "special groups" trained and funded by Iran—who are accused of the bulk of Shiite attacks on U.S. forces—and the Sadrist mainstream. "We thought that it would be important that we respect [Sadr's] decision to, fairly courageously, declare the ceasefire," Petraeus said in a recent interview with NEWSWEEK. In some Baghdad neighborhoods, the Americans are even paying Mahdi fighters to help keep the peace. Officially, the Sadrists deny any dialogue with Americans; a senior cleric says talks are a "red line" the movement wouldn't cross. But Petraeus says he is in regular contact with a "senior Sadr political official." Some of his ground commanders exchange text messages with counterparts in the Mahdi Army.
Sadr's ceasefire is, at one level, a PR move. In August, as thousands of Shiites flocked to Karbala for a religious festival, some of his supporters clashed with cops loyal to a rival Shiite party. Guns were drawn, and within days more than 50 people had been killed and nearly 500 wounded. "In 1,500 years of Shiite history we've never had such a thing, this group fighting against another group," says Ayad Jamaluddin, a prominent cleric and parliamentarian. Ordinary Shiites were appalled, and many blamed the excitable, unemployed young men who fill the ranks of the Mahdi Army. To restore order, Sadr and his aides formed a review committee and set up a "Golden Division" to mete out punishment to rogue fighters. "Many fighters formed gangs and used the name of the Sadrists to hide their crimes," says Sheik Salah Obeidi, a senior Sadr aide based in Najaf. "This committee was set up to look into these issues." Militiamen in Baghdad say members of the "Golden" unit drop into neighborhoods unexpectedly to conduct spot checks, and to deal harshly with troublemakers like the Assassin.
In early December Sadr issued another decree, urging his followers to focus on prayer and religious studies. He's leading by example. Senior clerics close to Sadr, who did not want to be named speaking about their boss, confirm that he himself is studying to ascend to the rank of ayatollah, using books, CDs and even texts on the Internet. Sadr, these aides say, is particularly focused on the teachings of Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, an Iraqi-born cleric who now heads the judiciary in neighboring Iran, as well as Ayatollah Ishaq Fayadh, one of the four top clerics in Najaf. Petraeus recently started using the honorific "seyed" when referring to Sadr and has asked U.S. officers to do the same.
Clearly the Americans sense an opportunity. They're reaching out most extensively at the grass-roots level, where the Sadrists have the greatest influence. A year ago the west Baghdad neighborhood of Jihad was one of the city's bloodiest. Executions were common; on one occasion an entire family, including a 4-year-old girl, was found bound and shot in the head. Mahdi Army militants were suspected in many of the deaths, and when the First Infantry Division's First Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment—the Black Lions—arrived last March, they went after the militants hard. "We had to get the right people off the streets," says Capt. Brian Ducote, a stout 31-year-old with a shaved head and an easy smile. One Shiite commander was kept on his toes for 24 hours as U.S. forces chased him across the neighborhood.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: Johndavidprince @ 03/29/2008 3:54:33 PM
Comment: The President gave yet another speech on (03.19.08). What bothered me was his refusal to stray form past catch phrases and bumper sticker stats Yes Saddam was a bad man. OK. We knew that. If that was the reason why we are there, we should be in regions in Africa, the Far East, and other Middle Eastern Nations like Saudi Arabia. Sorry, I do not buy what he is still selling as justification. The White House has been making the claim that the War has experienced success all along the way. Then why are there still 135,000 soldiers and over 100,000 contractors there at present? That is not counting Afghanistan. I have heard people defend the War with the excuse that, we have troops all over the word so why should we care about troops in Iraq. Well George Washington would call it a foreign entanglement that is not healthy for National Security nor is it healthy at 2.5 to 3.5 trillion dollars. The President continues to make the assertion that the actions have made the Nation safer. Well then we should stop paying attention to the reports of other government agencies and experts who have proven otherwise. We only have to watch the daily reports of yet another bombing or loss of soldiers from all the theaters of conflict and the truth becomes self-evident. He can say what he wants now that he will be passing the buck to a successor. The concept of pre-emptive war is not a true deterrent to war because it is still war. Why can we not realize this? War does not prevent War that is why pre-emptive use of force policy is a paradox. Can you have pre-emptive sex in order to prevent sex? If you do, use protection. In conclusion, the ends have not justified the means or the reasons for action. We could have ride Iraq of Saddam with more efficient methods. But if we are the Earth???s remover of bad, evil dictators, abusive theocracies, or brutal totalitarianism then we have a lot of countries to invade and trillions of dollars more for the middle class to finance.
Posted By: JohnGaltlaketahoe @ 03/26/2008 9:20:13 PM
Comment: No weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. No mobile biological weapons labs were found. Iraq did not seek to acquire yellowcake uranium. The aluminum tubes were not sultable for nuclear weapons. The lead hi-jacker in the events of 9/11 did not meet with Iraqi intelligence. Iraq did not provide chemical weapons training to Al-Qaeda. There was no relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda. Hussein nor Iraq was involved in the events of 9/11.
One million Iraqi citizens have died. 2 million have been displaced. Four thousand US soldiers have died. 100,000 have been wounded physically and mentally.
Only the oil remains. The conflicts of interest inherent in this Bush Administration are currently confiscating the natural resources of Iraq.
Should this entire Executive Branch he hung? Should there simply be another election and a new President to continue this nightmare? Only the American electorate can decide what treason and insurrection against the American electorate means.
But make no mistake....this Bush Administration used lies and innuendo to place the US military into Iraq.
Posted By: observer101 @ 02/13/2008 8:59:40 PM
Comment: I see that ppl still want to blame Bush for Iraqs poor downfall. The fact we went in there wasnt a lie, even Clinton believed something was going on in Iraq. Or was he lying as usual ? Am I the only one that remembers the Monica Lewinsky crap and the trial that seemed to dragg on for ever...And then a news flash came on that we had militarily struck at Saddam with cruise missles for some strange reason? Seems either Bush was telling the truths that the Clinton admin passed on to him or the adulterating Clinton admin just wanted a distraction and killed innocents for a lie. Either way it goes back to the Clinton era. Atleast he was IMPEACHED for his bull. Enjoy that fact Dems.