Leading Democrats To Bill Clinton: Pipe Down

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Maxwell P. Klinger 1 @ 01/21/2008 5:50:57 PM

    Obama, Osama. and Omama.
    Obama is neither black or white so leave that part out of the race!! He has spent only a couple of years in the American Senate, and that sure does not make him someone who knows the country or how to run it much less know anything about the people he is running against. He gets his untruths from someone else who could not win and is trying now to push Obama through. This is still the land of the free and I would like in my short time to keep it the land of the free. I will support a truthful person and I think John McCain is most knowledgeable and is deserving has been there done that and is an asset to this country, and I think Hillary Clinton has been so scrutinized by anyone of you who hate her so much that she is probably squeeky clean
    and well informed on the job of being President she would also be a good choice she is well versed on everything you can throw at her. She also has a great past President to back her.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 6:41:16 PM

      You are right. He is a Mohammed.

  • Posted By: my2girls @ 01/21/2008 5:48:37 PM

    Holy roller, the whole extremist muslim lie has been totally debunked. If your screen name is to suggest that you are a christian than you I am sure you are an advocate for the truth. So go check this out and then spread the truth. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp Come on people we are Americans and we should want all voters to be informed with the truth not lies in order to decide who to vote for. Let's get over the politics of hate and lies. We should want better for ourselves and our children.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 6:40:43 PM

      Answer me this-Your vote is based on the YouTube # of viewings, right. Any true American that would elect anyone with a mohammed heritage is at best foolish. Debunk all yoy want, I'm just getting started.

  • Posted By: nerakami @ 01/21/2008 3:58:01 PM

    Well, there you have it.... send your husband out to beat up on your opponents... is this how it's going to be when Hillary perceives terror threats, or if the Congress becomes too argumentative? Send Bill out to engage in battle? Remind me again, who are we voting for? Hillary or Bill?

    And for those who think this is acceptable because it's politics... think again, the ones who engage in these under-handed dirty politics are the very ones who will face the nation and tell bold-face lies... IT'S CALLED LACK OF CHARACTER.... give me an honest President with integrity.

  • Posted By: josim @ 01/21/2008 6:00:41 PM

    Bill Clinton is diminishing his own legacy. I would much rather remember him with the affection I once felt than my new feelings about him while watching him turn mean spririted doing and saying anything in order to get Hillary nominated. Come on Bill, you are better than that! Or, maybe not.

  • Posted By: Change is a verb not a platform @ 01/21/2008 3:23:55 PM

    If Obama lets Bill Clinton get under his skin, imagine what tough world leaders will do to him. What a cry baby!!!! Not a man who knows how to deal with adversity. Maybe he should go get some dope, and crack to help him with his personal issues. If you cant stand the heat, get the heck out of the kitchen.....whiner boy Obama!

    • Posted By: Uncommitted @ 01/21/2008 3:32:43 PM

      You must be completely braindead to write such a stupid post. How short your memory is. Do you recall:
      The boys are piling on?
      It's so hard" (and she cried)--I'll be Mamoud can't wait.
      I can't recall?

      You are most certainly braindead.

      • Posted By: Change is a verb not a platform @ 01/21/2008 3:37:32 PM

        Hey, I am not brain dead....I have brain damage from all the pot and coke I did with Obama.....while we were chasing skirts. I didn't call you names , is that how you Obama people behave?....Obama would be so proud of you, and your type! Keep it up and let your light shine though. The truth will set you free.

        • Posted By: Uncommitted @ 01/21/2008 5:50:58 PM

          Braindead is not a name at all; it is a condition that many people suffer from who have forgotten what the Clintoons brought us during the 90's. I am not for Obama, but I am against Hillary Rodham. She is a foul-mouthed crying poor excuse for a senator who has no experience whatsoever. Remember, braindead is a condition.

  • Posted By: mittons45@yahoo.com @ 01/21/2008 5:39:36 PM

    Why should he? Where were all these protective Dems when they were bashing the hell out of Dean? The whole Democratic Party has gotten as bad, hypocritcal, crooked, and greedy as the Republicans. A pox on both of their houses.

  • Posted By: edlindsey @ 01/21/2008 4:21:51 PM

    I can't believe the ignorance of people! Go Obama. I have always admired Bill Clinton even at his darkest hour during impeachment but I have never been more disappointed with him then I am now. He is unpresidential in his behavior and he is demeaning his position by playing attack dog for his wife. If Hillary is a true feminist then why does she need her husband to attack her opponents?

    • Posted By: nannyred7 @ 01/21/2008 5:33:06 PM

      I don't know, why does she? But then, as I remember, Michelle Obama lashed out for her husband. Is that different? Maybe. Real men don't hide behind women's skirts (or comments either). So if we can't have a real man, let's have a real woman. Bet your definition of 'real woman' is different than mine.

  • Posted By: BrianARice @ 01/21/2008 5:18:57 PM

    I didn't mind Bill Clinton campaigning for his wife. But, when he fibs and slants comments in an obvious way it reminds me too much of the idiotic Monica Lewinsky situation... He lies when he needs to.

  • Posted By: Kirko @ 01/21/2008 4:54:47 PM

    Bill Cinton is not distorting Obama's stand on the war. Obama did indeed say in a July 2004 interview that he did not know how he would have voted on authorization of the war. He went on to say in July 2004 that there was not much difference in his postion and George Bush's position on the war. Those statements were addressed by Tim Russert on Meet the Press on No. 11, 2007. Based on those statements, Obama has not always been against the war. Bill Clinton is not wrong when he points this out.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 5:15:14 PM

      Very good post. As Americans we need to stop making our decisions on political info from YouTube. Obama is not honest about any of his views. He is an underground muslim. At the very leasr we know what we get with Hillary. Not to mention she will have no problem bombing Abdullah back to the Stone Age if they pull teir sh.t again. But as long as I'm able I say GO RUDY!!!

  • Posted By: James D. @ 01/21/2008 4:39:51 PM

    Well....what seems to be missed by Bill and their campaign is...they are losing LONG time supporters for the general election should she get the nomination. *I* am one vote they will **now** NOT get. I am completely disgusted with their campaign tactics.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 4:49:02 PM

      They may lose you , but they are gaining ground with many liberal Repub. I will not vote for any candidate with a MOHAMMED name or background. They want you dead moron. I will not vote for a MORMON. I'm hoping for RUDY to take control, but my backup vote is HILLARY.

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 01/21/2008 4:46:17 PM

      Agree - if they loose the support of life-long democrats in the end, was it worth it?! I pledge NEVER to vote for a Clinton again...

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 4:44:21 PM

    AMERICA HAVE WE REDUCED OURSELVES TO THIS TICKET/

    OBAMA/BIN LADEN vs ROMNEY/TOM CRUISE (two cults better than one)

    open your eyes before its gone too far!!!

  • Posted By: Change is a verb not a platform @ 01/21/2008 4:06:41 PM

    All we hear about is the "black " vote and the "woman" vote.....Republicans want Obama to win because they know in the end they would get the "whiteman" vote. Be careful what you wish for here.....or we will end up with a Republican in office. Obama is playing the wrong cards and playing into the hands of others. He is predicable and easy to manipulate.....just watch as it goes on......who is getting more coverage?who's on their heels?

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 01/21/2008 4:30:56 PM

      Look at the independents - they do swing towards Obama or McCain, never HRC. HRC's ceiling in her own party is substanial (and lowers every day she goes on), and has NO cross-over appeal. There is a large absence of ANTI-obama sentiment in the GOP, and the Rovians are itching to run the same-old, same old battles agains Billary. Omama only can beat McCain, who is scaring off a large group in his own party, either for not being conservative enough, or with his strong war support. Remember "Bom, Bom, Bom, Iran"?! No talisman will help us then!

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 01/21/2008 4:14:58 PM

    WAY TO GO BILL!!!-Even though the last Dem I have voted for is Jimmy Carter(show how foolish we are when we are young) I applaud Mr. Clinton. He can't say the real truth so I will. Politics aside BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA. Give me a break, who's his running mate? Osama??? If he truly rejected Mohammed and accepte JESUS then why no change of name? LEW ALCINOR-KAREEM ABDUL JABAR. CASSIUS CLT-MUHAMMED ALI, CAT STEVENS-YOUSEF YABBADABBADO. It is customary to carry a MUSLIM name to authenticate the faith. AMERICA are you really so blind??? Are we reduced to a MORMON or a MOHAMMED as our choices? GO RUDY and GO HILLARY.

  • Posted By: mda56 @ 01/21/2008 3:06:51 PM

    Is everyone's memory that short? That's scary! Do you not remember the 8 years of continuous scandals, Slick's impeachment, Monica Lewinsky? We also need to question Hillary's judgement. After all she is the one who did not want to settle with Paula Jones and the continuation of that investigation unearthed Ms. Lewinsky. Do we need 8 more years of this kind of behavior? Bill has already established his legacy.

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 01/21/2008 3:57:20 PM

      We indeed need to question HRC's judgment - in voting for a war WITHOUT READING the supporting documents - 94 pages should not have take the "certified genius" (Bill's words) that long. She said she cast this difficult vote "with conviction" - based on WHAT? No one of her staffers had clearance to see the doc. titled "Authorisation to use force"... Are we parsing 'is" again?

  • Posted By: haili @ 01/21/2008 3:42:49 PM

    remember in Dartmouth Clinton 1 claimed he was not to blame for the bush dynasty? well, in 2000 Gore narrowly lost, because he was not able to use prez Clinton to campaign for him, and because of WHAT? any decent leader of a major country would have long resigned under similar situations just so the business of the public would not be distracted. If the politician involved is guilty or not is a none issue. it's the service, stupid!

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 01/21/2008 3:53:22 PM

      Indeed - just remember what % of the Clintons first 2 terms was spent on their antics, distracting us from the business of the country, like the growing al Queda threath! Dems, speak up and show them that we deserve better!

  • Posted By: quill @ 01/21/2008 3:46:39 PM

    What I don't like about this article and those like it is that all the criticism is falling on Bill rather than Hillary. I think that's exactly the way they've planned it--he can say anything he likes about Obama without the blame coming back to her.

    But wow, to think that Ted Kennedy might be throwing in with Obama. I hope he does. And equally as much, I hope he doesn't wait until February 5 to do so. Obama needs a win now, in SC, to convince voters that we actually do have a better choice in this election than the Clintons and their dynasty.

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 01/21/2008 3:51:23 PM

      I hope Kennedy speaks up, and Gore, and Feingold, and Carter - and even the ones that endorsed the Clintons (plural), but care more about the party than this power-hungy couple!

  • Posted By: su haili @ 01/21/2008 3:40:21 PM

    remember in Dartmouth Clinton 1 claimed he was not to blame for the bush dynasty? well, in 2000 Gore narrowly lost, because he was not able to use prez Clinton to campaign for him, and because of WHAT? any decent leader of a major country would have long resigned under similar situations just so the business of the public would not be distracted. If the politician involved is guilty or not is a none issue. it's the service, stupid!

  • Posted By: L66ONLINE@MSN.COM @ 01/21/2008 2:17:06 PM

    DISCUSSING VERACITY AMONG LEFTY'S IS REALLY OF NO CONCERN. WHEN IT COMES TO SOCIALISM TRUTH AND INEGRITY PLACE A DISTANT THIRD......

    • Posted By: Girl Esquire @ 01/21/2008 3:38:59 PM

      Gee it never even occured to me that left handed people would have a problem with veracity. Thank goodness for rightys who continue to promote truth, justice and the American way in ALL CAPS.

  • Posted By: danny26ini @ 01/21/2008 3:31:34 PM

    Bill Clinton has no credibility. He is a lying, two faced, perjurer, perjury subordinating obstructor of justice. He abused his official power, he condoned corruption within his staff, not to mention his personal life. He has no virtue or integrity. Now we are supposed to accept the idea of another Clinton in the White House who learned everything she know from her husband. She is as corrupt as he is, she took lessons from him. Don't forget the Rose Law Firm, Castle Grande, Whitewater, her windfall cattle purchase, staffing the White House with incompetents, obstructing justice after Vincent Foster's suicide, her lack of memory when questioned by Congress regarding all of the above. From her Congressional testimony and lack of memory she can only be considered incompetent as an attorney, her stint as first lady was abominable, as a Senator she has accomplished nothing, and now she has the nerve to run for President based on her acquired knowledge of the position? For the sake of the country, lets not make the same mistake again!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse