In The Shadow of Bush

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: liddi_40 @ 01/21/2008 2:08:37 PM

    Methinks. I really like that post. It misses one point, Bush could not have done those things without his Republican brothers.

    • Posted By: methinks @ 01/21/2008 5:43:18 PM

      True. Republicans took over because people felt the Democrats fielded greedy, self absorbed, power hungry individuals. The came along Tom Delay, racial controversies of Trent Lott and George Allen, the scandals and criminal activities involving such people as Bernard Kerik, Duke Cunningham, Bob Ney, Jack Abramoff, Mark Foley, lawyergate, David Vitter, Larry Craig, Newt Gingrich. etc. Are the Democrats saints? No, but the Republicans took over and made the Democrats look like a bunch of rookies at such activities. They developed it into an art form.

  • Posted By: Peachtreeteacher @ 01/20/2008 1:37:50 AM

    George Bush made such a mess of this country, that it will years to come to terms with the federal deficit, and makes a Clinton Restoration inevitable. John McCain looks like Bob Dole 1996 and Huckabee looks like Goldwater 1964, both destined to lose by wide margins. Bush has single-handedly destroyed the military with the war in Iraq, let New Orleans become a dying city, robbed from the poor with his tax cuts aimed at the wealthy, destroyed the US Constitution, and no longer to people around the world look up to the United States. The aftermath of Bush vs. Gore destroyed the reputation of the US Supreme Court and made the majority look like partisan hacks.

    • Posted By: FREE AND THE BRAVE @ 01/21/2008 5:42:19 PM

      What short memories we all have. WE have already had "Billary", in office. Ole slick Willie did a lot for his cronies,but not much for us. He was a little "preoccupied" to deal with foreign affairs. On to the MLK flap with Hillary and Obama,when King was preaching,Hillary was a "Goldwater girl" REPUBLICAN. He lost to LBJ because he was for SEGREGATION! The Clintons are LIARS! The other front runner- Barack Hussein Obama,how many Americans do you know with a name like that?The fact he stood facing away from everyone else arms folded defiantly,makes me a veteran, so angry I can't stand it. As for his record as a senator,hmm...he did vote "present", a lot! That's taking a stand!I tell you people this country is heading for disaster, The major banks selling their interests in foreign countries, to name one.The reason McCain didn't make it in 2000 was due to the overly effective mudslinging campaign of the Bush camp. If McCain had been elected in 2000 we wouldn't be in the mess we're in now! McCain has Honor, Courage, and a sense of Duty you can't understand unless you've been in the military He is also willing and able to cross party lines to get the job done! McCain for president, the one true LEADER!

    • Posted By: Brocklin000 @ 01/20/2008 1:42:20 PM

      Irrationality reigns. Iraq has not destroyed our military - albeit I wish we'd just pull - those people don'te want to be helped. The same goes for the comment the Bush destropyed New Orleans - they destroyed themselves. Worst culture of people in the US - they want everything for nothing. They did nothing to prevent the devastation - they control the locks - many ran from the city and won't return uless we taxpayers build them homes and put them on welfare for life.

      • Posted By: broman @ 01/20/2008 3:23:43 PM

        Geeze, where is that cartoon that was pulled off the mainstream?,,,the one with no heads showing,,,I think Brocklinooo may be one of them. With comments like "they destroyed themselves" please, get educated about what happend before u shoot ur mouth off,,,,wow,,,,,"they control locks" what a joke!

  • Posted By: bill50 @ 01/20/2008 2:41:50 PM

    I disagree with the last comment that there is nothing good to say about President Bush. Here are a few things people are missing. We have not had a terrorist attack on American soil since 911. During his term we have, until recently a very strong economy. When he said he was going to do something he did it and did not make decisions according to what the polls said, as most Democrats will do. I have retired from the military with almost 21 years service. I spent my time in the light infantry. One of the deciding factors on my retirement was President Clinton. I have served with both Republican and Democratic Presidents and have found that Democrats more likely get soldiers killed and then leave without completing the mission. So then their deaths don't count for anything. For example Carter in Iran and Clinton in Somalia.
    Today everyone blames Bush for so many Guard and reservist in Iraq. What people do not remember is that was Clintons plan when he cut the military even further than the first President Bush did after the first Gulf War. This cutback was the reason I retired. I could see our Military going the way of Carter. Now we blame President Bush and so do the Clintons.
    It is easy to be an arm chair quarterback and luckly we live in a country that allows us to do this. Unless you have actually been in that situation and had your life depend on the decisions from the person at the top you don't have the knowledge to make those opinions. Remeber the last war the Democrats started and managed was Vietnam.

    BW

    • Posted By: ademeyer @ 01/21/2008 9:51:44 AM

      Wow, your memory is selective. Johnson declined to run for a second term because he was so unpopular due to his policies during the Vietnam War. Did Nixon correct those policies? No, he "surged" the troops, resulting in even more carnage and loss of American prestige in the world's opinion. Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al served in Nixon's administrations and looked at Bush 43's as a chance to try the old policies with predictable results. Clinton, you conveniently have forgotten, deposed a Serbian tyrant bent on genocide, without losing a single American life.

      • Posted By: bluebloodedLV @ 01/21/2008 5:32:26 PM

        I truly do not understand this belief that it's all because of Bush that we weren't attacked in the last 7 years. There is no logic in this statement. Those who make this statement must have undeniable proof that one of our soldiers killed a person who was planning an attack on the US. This makes no sense!

        If the purpose for invading Iraq was to lessen the number of radical islamic males who want to attack the US, haven't we miserably failed that mision? Haven't we done a fine job at INCREASING the number of radical islamic males who want to attack the US?

        Terrorism: 1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes. THINK ABOUT IT!!



  • Posted By: mikesorensen @ 01/20/2008 11:58:10 AM

    I think the President's greatest failure has been as the spokesman or champion of a Republican ideology. Since 1994 the Democrats have run a perpetual negative campaign to define Republicans as "mean, greedy people, who hate children and puppies. They have been successful. As a result of that success, we see Evan Thomas implying that the GOP???s core ideology has been rejected, or has somehow outlived its usefulness. I don???t think so.

    I think people still want a smaller, less intrusive, more efficient, more effective government. Republicans have no faith in the ???central planning??? model that has been such a dismal failure in the Soviet Union, China, and Cuba. Rather than having our governmental decisions made by some faceless bureaucrat in some Ivory Tower in Washington, we prefer to have power held by elected officials, and for that power to be held as near the people as practical, at the state and local level. So that the people can hold those local officials accountable and exert more direct influence than they could over federal officials.

    The Republican principal that government benefits should be dispensed on the basis of need rather than race or gender doesn???t make us racists. The Republican preference to give those in need a job and an opportunity to earn their own way isn???t motivated by greed but rather by the principal that it is better to ???teach a man to fish??? that to give a man a fish.

    The President???s shortcoming as a champion for the ideology has thus far been shared by the candidates. I don???t care how many times a candidate has been married, or who hates abortion the most or who is the most religious. I do care about the principals by which he or she will govern.

    • Posted By: Saltydog_0 @ 01/21/2008 5:06:35 PM

      Republicans love children and puppies!! There's quite a profit in them.

  • Posted By: Lexy1998 @ 01/20/2008 5:07:17 PM

    Mustard gas was used to kill hundreds of Curds. Women and children lay dead in the streets. What if that was one of our cities? Nobody knew what to expect when we went to war. We are in it now and we need to finish it. Republicans radical? We have always fought for this country. My brothers, Father, and Husband did. Did you? Not for power but for freedom. If your common sense had not been educated from your minds, you could see more clearly. There was evidence that Saddam PAID to palestinians when they killed innocent people. Their families recieved $10,000 for their loved ones life. They were told they would have 100 virgins waiting for them after they died. Do you really think you can deal intelligently with people with so much hatred against us? Hatred only because we (some of us) believe in God. The want to destroy us only because of OUR religion. Yes we are infidels because we don't believe tin allah.

    • Posted By: nanday @ 01/20/2008 10:37:55 PM

      What if that was one of our cities? What are you trying to say? That Sadam was going to come here and gas us? Come on. Don't live in fear. I certainly would defend America, I am a little old now, but I would not willingly go to Iraq. Certainly your family is very patriotic, and should be honored for their efforts, but this is Bush's war. Why did we even care what Sadam did to the Kurds anyways? I mean, seriously, how does this affect us? If that was the reason we went into Iraq, then what a sad loss of good American lives. Obviously, by your own statements, that area is run by Muslim extremists. Why is it our perogative to free the Muslims from the Muslims? We haven't done much to stop the killings in Darfur. And, that was muuuuch worse. It's unAmerican to live in fear, isn't it?

      • Posted By: seted @ 01/21/2008 3:47:21 PM

        They are called Kurds. And don't fool yourself, there's been enuff death to go around since this started.

  • Posted By: breeze68 @ 01/20/2008 5:40:55 PM

    I didn't know anything about any CURDS (sounds like something they make in Wisconsin), but I do know about the Kurdish people. I find it laughable that Bush says Saddam "gassed his own people" when in fact Bush provides intelligence to Turkey who then use airstrikes against them. Whats the difference? Gassed or bombed your just as dead. Oh and MMShadow, didn't we do that in Afghanistan? We provided the tools for them to oust the Soviets but when they pulled out, there was a huge vacuum left behind, and thats what created Al-Qaeda. And for Air Force Mom: Democrats have led this country to war more times than the Republicans have. I'm all for the draft, I think we need it and its necessary. Ages 18-40 (I say 40 because then that includes me, and I am fully capable of going). I believe in this country too and just because I didn't sign up shouldn't make it any different. You sign up, you shouldn't complain when its your turn to go, because thats what you signed up for.

    • Posted By: seted @ 01/21/2008 3:38:35 PM

      We could just give them all up to be tried for war crimes, problem solved.

    • Posted By: nanday @ 01/20/2008 10:46:43 PM

      Thank you for the correction i.e.Kurds not Curds! I just copied someone without thinking.

  • Posted By: daylight @ 01/21/2008 3:33:17 PM

    Another article where the media makes McCain look better than everyone else (IN THEIR EYES). Please anyone for presedent BUT McCain!!

  • Posted By: racollin @ 01/21/2008 3:02:43 PM

    This was one of the most insightful and lucid articles I've read regarding the Bush Presidency. It's too bad that these thoughts and ideas (most of which have been glaringly obvious to the 'average American' for years) weren't heeded by the Republican leadership sooner. The President's complete disregard for any view other than his own (or of his ulltra-right-wing cronies) has slowly eroded his support with Moderate Republicans and has, in fact, moved many into the Democratic camp.
    The author's observation that the Democrats continually demonstrate the uncanny ability to wrest defeat from the jaws of victory is spot on. But this ability is not relegated to the Democrats. The Republicans have the same capacity. The continuous "my country right or wrong" refrain heard from the President's office and much of the Republican leadership has had the same effect of ailenating the moderate middle as did the Democrats' misguided belief that most Americans were Left Wing Liberals during the '60's and 70's.
    The fact is that we are a country of Centrists. The bulk of the American voting populace doesn't want either extreme. We want Statesmen; politicians who can put the best interests of the counrty first and the interests of their Party second (as impossible as this may sound). The country is Hungry for Statesmanship, and I believe that the candidate that most epitomizes this single attribute will be the winner in the up-coming election. If the Republicans have any hope of overcoming the huge hill that the current President has given them to climb, it will be their focus on this one, key attribute that must be brought to the fore.
    Thank you for an excellent article. It gives voice to much of the frustration and confusiton that many Republicans have been feeling for some time. I hope the Republican candidates read it!

  • Posted By: Displaced Democrat @ 01/21/2008 2:26:13 PM

    I Do Not Think Anyone In Washington is Listening to the Cry Of The People, the immigration issue is one thing We Faced With a Border Since 1492, when we arrived the Indians Were trying to Protect their Border, then Someone offered Some Trinkets for their Land, some of the cheifs accepted and was forced to move, others tried to fight and was sent to a land no-one wanted until we found oil then Greed Wanted it Back, Remember What goes Around Comes Around and NO AMOUNT OF MONEY CAN REVERSE What Has Happened, Washington Paid Big Business to Leave America and while they Prosper the People who Purchase Most of their Products are Left with a low paying or No Job. Until America Wakes Up We can Only get worse, The News Media is Also Thinking of who does the best for them, real Soon People can not Afford Them or their Reasons. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!! We Need Help America before WW-2, was Self supporting Now we can not Survive on our Own.. Please Write your Elected Official about Your Concerns. Please..

    • Posted By: liddi_40 @ 01/21/2008 2:32:43 PM

      i think its worth mentioning that China is using an incredible amount of Oil. Thanks to US. No wonder supply is strained.

  • Posted By: Neshamah101 @ 01/21/2008 2:24:56 PM

    And: "The heart of the matter is not the issue of prayer in schools or even the content of the rest of the right-wing prorgram which has been labeled as "family values." It is in the uses of the program as a weapon of attack. It evokes memories and resonances in the collective conscious of Jews. In his heyday, the tsar of Russia oppressed the Jews and the urban poor, escaping their wrath by encouraging the Russian Orthodox Church to rise against the Jews with the charge of "Christ killers." Because the tsar was the head of the church, and, therefore, the 'great father' of the poor, they were thus induced to forget about their need for bread by being fed the circus of a pogrom. Jews are hearing the first sounds of such a connection, as terrifying as an
    alarm bell in the night, in the insistence by right-wingers that the supposed destruction of family values in America is the fault of the liberals. The conservatives have thrown an attack on multiculturalism into the
    mix to position themselves as defenders of traditional European civilization against the liberal commitment to multiculturalism. This makes most Jews uncomfortable, and even nervous. The conservative vision of American culture says to us that our Jewish heritage is outside the canon dominated by the writings of ancient Greeks and medieval and modern Christians. The rich will get richer through lowered taxes in revival of "trickle down" economics, and the sinking middleclass will be told that punishing unwed mothers will satisfy their hungers. The move from crying out that liberalism, and not injustice, is the enemy to shouting that the Jew, the outsider, is responsible for that injustice is a possibility that now seems nearer
    to the horizon."

  • Posted By: Neshamah101 @ 01/21/2008 2:24:31 PM

    an excerpt from Reform Judaism magazine of Spring 1995, Arthur Hertzberg, God bless his Soul, responds to the "Republican Revolution" and "Contract With America" of the 1994 election, and answers the question, "Should Jews Fear the Conservative Victory" as follows:"Feudal kings and princes, and the rich bourgeois of medieval and early modern free cities took turns in deflecting the angers of the poor on
    the Jews. Late in the nineteenth century, the tsarist regime in Russia bought time and delayed revolution by offering up the Jews to the angry muzhiks as the objects of pogroms. The rich in Germany in the 1920's and 1930's were pleased that the motives in National Socialism, which reflected the anger of the poor at their misery during the inflation of the 1920's, were directed not at them but at the Jews. Many plutocrats in Germany indulged and helped finance the Nazis. And in America, the most virulent anti-Semitism occurred in the 1930's during the Great Depression. It has waned in the last half century, as more inclusive America has woven a safety net for the poor. We are now living a moment in American history when high-tech jobs are
    more available, but less secure, a time when opportunity for blue collar workers is shrinking irreversibly. Not so very subtly, right-wing ideologues are already deflecting these angers at scapegoats - the blacks and the poor - suggesting that the chronic unemployed, recent (il)legal) immigrants, and welfare mothers are destroying the moral fabric of society and, because of their supposed innate intellectual inferiority, are undermining our nation's economic future. If the social safety net that was constructed in the last half century
    is removed, a violent reaction will follow and cities will become even less safe than they are today. It will no longer be enough to blame the liberals; Jews will become the prime scapegoat."

  • Posted By: Loquitor @ 01/21/2008 2:20:55 PM

    He could not have done it without his Democratic sisters and brothers as well. Can we ever hope to have a discussion based on fact rather than position?

  • Posted By: Tank 2008 @ 01/21/2008 12:07:05 PM

    bill50 did not take time to read Evan Thomas' article, then spewed forth typical Right Wing Republican ranting about Bill Clinton. I saw the intelligence and received briefings during the 1990s about terrorism, and who was and was not a threat to the United States. Saddam was way down on the list, though still repugnant There is no greater condemnation than to take a nation to war when it is not justified, unnecessary and is not with the consent of the people, acquired by rational, objective presentation of facts and reality based arguments, not lies, deceptions, mischaracterizations and falsehoods. Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, Rumsfeld, Bolton, Wolfowitz and the rest of the signatories to the infamous 1998 letter to President Clinton advising the invasion of Iraq must all live with the blood of hundreds of thousands of people on their souls, not that any of them truly care. They escaped accountability here on Earth, but one hopes they will not escape in the Hereafter. The Republican Party must prove to me and to most Americans that it can be trusted to do more than protect Big Business from justifiable Federal Government regulation and paying their fair shared of taxes to support our country. It must prove that it can be trusted to be more than just greedy. Maybe in 2024.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 01/21/2008 1:02:15 PM

      great answer and good points, but to remind the people that during a war someone outed an undercover CIA operative and got caught. This is nothing less than Treason, and the penelty for Treason during the time of war, is death, no to commute the sentence! Rove, Libby and Bush all guilty! The term GOP and trust will take more than one election I hope, but 2024 might just do it! You do have a good grasp of what is, and is not! It's refreshing to see, thanks from a military man. Who was part of the intell you got to see, maybe, as in the late 70s, till I was released, I did not exsist, my name was, and still is, NOBODY cause we were not there. Supposedly?

      • Posted By: JBuzicky75@comcast.net @ 01/21/2008 1:21:04 PM

        The Plame treason is the tip of the iceberg! Google Sibel Edmonds. This story is huge everywhere but in American media! Seems odd, but its true. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3216737.ece

        • Posted By: nanday @ 01/21/2008 2:19:03 PM

          Unfortunately I went to this website referred above. The most ironic outcome could be that we do in fact get nuked by our own weapons of mass destruction that we let fall into the hands of those who will actually use them.

        • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 01/21/2008 1:55:42 PM

          WAY TO TRUE! A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE TRIED DURING A TIME OF WAR! NOW WE KNOW WHY IRAQ WAS ON THE WAR BOARD, PRIOR TO 9/11!

  • Posted By: liddi_40 @ 01/21/2008 2:18:33 PM

    Everyone assumes threat will come from oversees. Could it come from within? Obviously some nations hate us, but can Germany (WWII) happen here? Has the Justice department been tampered with? Would anyone dare cross the machine in Washington? We live in a time of Satellite an unlimited government power. Is it so hard to imagine? Anybody else thinking big change is needed or am i reaching? You tell me.

  • Posted By: diena @ 01/21/2008 2:15:41 PM

    President Bush the greatest President ever. Period!

  • Posted By: classof65 @ 01/21/2008 1:38:20 PM

    Would you folks please stop referring to some republicans as "evangelical voters"? There are not two parties within the republican party (evangelicals and non-evangelicals). I don't think you really know what evangelism is. If you did, you wouldn't use that term.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 01/21/2008 1:53:04 PM

      RIGHT THEY ARE CALLED "EXTREMIST" A TERM USED FOR THOSE WHO TOUT THERE RELIGION AS THE ONE AND ONLY LIKE ROMNEY AND HUCKABEE!

  • Posted By: Neshamah101 @ 01/21/2008 1:42:55 PM

    ???On March 11, 2002, on the 6 month anniversary to commemorate 9/11 our Republican Yale University Skull and Bones Secret Society graduate knew to say, "There will be a day, when the organized threat against America, our friends and allies, is broken. And when the terrorists are disrupted and scattered and discredited, many old conflicts will appear in a new light - without the constant fear and cycle of bitterness that terrorists spread with their violence. We will see then that the old and serious disputes can be settled within the bounds of reason, and goodwill, and mutual security. I see a peaceful world beyond the war on terror, and with courage and unity, we are building that world together."

    "End the occupation of Arab lands," this war President tells Israel in Jerusalem?

    7,5 years ago he said, "If elected, I'll go after America's internal terrorists?"

    "History shows us what is possible?"

    Caught in Thought, Mr. President, you and your global Illuminati co-conspirators?

    This is nothing less, more or else than another "modern" round of fascist Skull and Bones Crimes Against Humanity, a war against Go(o)d.

    There is no "war on terror" but another war against Judaism and against Israel.

    Distance yourself from all campaigns of division and hatred and negativity, do not take any part in this for it is an illusion of the five-sense world, do not allow yourself to be instigated and pulled into a hate zone for on a metaphysical/spiritual level of invisible energies like attracts like and so you'll make yourself vulnerable to those who are aroused to hatred and violence.

    Love thy neighbor no matter what.

    • Posted By: America-loveitorleaveit @ 01/21/2008 1:49:46 PM

      Dude.... what the hell is this?

  • Posted By: Majorteddy @ 01/21/2008 1:25:07 PM

    Now the Republicans know what its like to try to outlive the shadow of disgrace from a disappointing president. The Democrats could not run from the Clinton legacy, as Al Gore found out. The trouble is, the Democrats seem poised to jump in for another for another cold dip in the Clinton pool of disgrace just as they are emerging from the shadow of the first Clinton fiasco.

  • Posted By: bill50 @ 01/21/2008 11:39:19 AM

    What would Clinton have done after 911 if he was president. NOTHING. This is proven by the first attack on the World Trade Center Yes Clinton did have a surplus but he did this by raising taxes and cutting the Military and CIA. He told us that the Reserves and National Guard could pick up the slack in a war. That is what we have today and everyone is crying about it. It is because of these cuts that we are in the predicament we are in now. An cut down CIA was inaffectual and now our military is small. We did not get the right intelligence before 911 and Iraq. Could Iraq have weapons of mass distruction. They had them and used them in the past so there was nothing to say they did not have them then. Was Iraq training Terrorist. Yes. Have we done the right thing disposing a dictator that was killing his own people by the thousands. Yes again. We are fighting terrorist now and they will not go away or negotiate. As long as we are fighting them in Iraq and Afganstan we are not fighting them here. Lets not make the same mistake again and elect another Clinton or pull out of Iraq before we are finished. One thing the terrorist have learned from Clinton and Somialia is that if you hang in there and make it tough on Americans they will fall apart and leave especially if a Democrat is in office and the polls are against the war. That is how they plan to win.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 01/21/2008 1:22:26 PM

      I also take it you do not have a problem with our blessing to allow the Baath party back into power or selling 900+ "smart bombs" to the same country the terrorist who took out the WTC came from, and as of today over 40% of the terrorist in Iraq are comming out of Saudi! I also know you have no clue as to our arming trainng and funding Bin-Lauden! We even gave him access to stingers and billions of bucks out of our pockets! Bhutto warned Bush Sr. we were creating a Frankenstein and paid for her insult with her life! Hussain was under glass as of 91 and in 91 Bush Sr. quoted saying "we cannot now or EVER AFFORD TO INVADE IRAQ" and all his WMDs were wiped out in 91, watch CNN for a min and watch our bombs hit every target we aimed at and this was done by lazing targets by sildiers we left behind! The WMDs he possesed came from us in the first place, including the Serin gas the Baath party asked him to use on the Kurds? Deomcrates according to you rebuild our country, and the GOP tries to rule the world on the backs of the poor! I prefere to rebuild our country, its in dire need of it! If Bush is such a great man why are we not in Sudan now, or did he not say "we will hunt them down where ever they are" but just in Iraq? wake up! serve! put your stocks into Halliburton and get rich unlike the rest of America. if we did not stick our noses into others politics, we would not have gotten a bloody nose! 3000 dead, 2.5 million jobs! Bush got the better end of that stick, and makes me wounder? To bad it USED to be if we spent 2 billion a day, 1.8 billion came back to American soil! Not today we spend, and 3,000,000 comes back to US soil!

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 01/21/2008 1:04:43 PM

      I'll take this as the fact you have no clue to Clintons actions in 96 with concern to Hussain and the greenzone for the Kurds. I guess if Americans did not die it's a nothing move-right?

  • Posted By: Neshamah101 @ 01/21/2008 1:19:54 PM

    As planned, all Presidential Candidates and many others will distance themselves from GWB. This is political and religious spin and witch craft like we've never seen before. Why distance oneself from GWB? Because it is to appear that it is Israel and the pro-Israel, pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist "neo-cons," their Amen corner and their wealthy lobbyists and special interests representatives who have corrupted this Presidency (and previous Presidencies), misdirected U.S. foreign policy in the past decades to ruin America's reputation abroad and brought economic hardship and recession, eternal war and lack of basic building blocks and elements for a Good Life for We The People such as living wages, job security, social security, health care and education.

    It wasn't by accident or by co-incidence that GWB said 7,5 years ago during a Republican primary, as a meaningless Skull and Bones Governor of Texas, that "if elected, I'll go after America's internal terrorists," and then, visiting Auschwitz he said, "History shows us what is possible."

    And so now we have a Mr. Fix-It Mitt Romney who launched his Presidential Campaign at Nazi and Hitler supporter Henry Ford museum and all the candidates, mind you, on both sides if the aisle look up to Ronald Reagan and say that they wish to emulate him as President.

    Ronald Reagan was the sorry deceiver of a U.S. President who, in 1985, accepted the invitation of Helmut Kohl to visit a SS Gestapo cemetary in Bitburg, (W.) Germany. It was SS Gestapo officers during WWII who wore the Skull and Bones symbol on their uniforms, who helped make the Holocaust possible.

    1 + 1 = 2, no?

    Take it from here...


Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse