Quantcast

Turning Up the Heat

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

At last week's debate, and for most of the last year, the top three Democrats suppressed their natural competitive feelings for the greater family good. Perhaps at times they even repressed the resentment that simmered among them—the nasty feeling that the others were standing in the way of their rightful position as the presidential nominee. Of course, they may have simply been in denial, refusing to admit their obvious afflictions as ambitious politicians.

It was compelling to watch all those psychological problems burst into the open on Monday night, just days before the South Carolina primary. Clinton and Obama's visceral dislike for each other was obvious, while Edwards stayed cordial—but fought for equal time. For the record, Obama threw the first punch about Clinton copying him on tax rebates. "That wasn't the original focus of her plan," he said. "I think recently she has caught up with what I had originally said, which is we've got to get … tax cuts into the pockets of hard-working Americans right away."

That was only a glancing blow compared with the right hook he landed a little later on both Clinton and John Edwards on the issue trade. "It is absolutely true that NAFTA was a mistake," he said. "I know that Hillary … just last year said this was a boon to the economy. I think it has been devastating, because our trade agreements did not have labor standards and environmental standards that would assure that workers in the U.S. were getting a square deal." Then he turned on Edwards for his vote for permanent trade relations with China.

This marks a new phase in Obama's campaign: the steel cage fight that his aides had long scorned. His fellow candidates were only too happy to jump into the cage with him.

Clinton accused Obama of being a lawyer "representing your contributor, [Antoin] Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner-city Chicago." (Chicago businessman Rezko was indicted last fall on federal charges of influence peddling.) Obama said that, as an associate in a local law firm, he performed several hours of legal work in involving Rezko's housing developments. Last weekend Obama returned more than $40,000 in political contributions that had been linked to Rezko. Rezko's attorney has said Rezko is innocent and intends to fight all charges.  Edwards accused them both of engaging in "squabbling." Clinton and Edwards both swung at Obama for his votes on credit card interest rates, his scores of "present" votes in the Illinois legislature, and his health-care proposals. "Well, you know, Senator Obama, it is very difficult having a straight-up debate with you," said Clinton, "because you never take responsibility for any vote, and that has been a pattern."

Obama likes to say that voters need less heat in Washington and more light. If there was any light from Monday's debate it came in a simple contrast between how Clinton and Obama spoke about Republicans. Clinton insisted she was the best candidate to withstand Republican attacks in the general election. Obama insisted he was the best candidate to attract Republicans in the general election.

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: delakile @ 01/26/2008 5:08:39 AM

    Comment: I have to say the as an Independent, I am totally disgusted by the Clintons. They have no shame or any decency. These two will do anything to get elected. And to further the notion of how low these two will go, someone please tell me, who exactly is running for the whitehouse? Is it Hillary or Bill? Listening to the two of them, you can't tell. That is just out right disgraceful.

    You would think that the Clintons would have waited until after the primaries inorder to unleash their wrath but true to their characters, it doesn't matter who it is they are fighting. This is as "bloody" as one can get without actually committing the act! And to prove how bad it is, just listen to the pleas from the rest of the democratic party. They are saying, "pipe it down!" What else can one say?

    Remember that evil cannot triumph. It can try and squirm its way around but it will eventually be defeated. The Clintons are in the "evil" realm of what humans are. Ultimately, their deceptive, corruptive and vicious nature will be squashed once and for all!!!

  • Posted By: isupport @ 01/25/2008 4:56:02 PM

    Comment: Between Omama and Clinton - they are both weak. But of the two, Obama shows strength within himself. Whereas Hillary and her husband seem to be weakening her campaign.

  • Posted By: Johnny1967 @ 01/24/2008 4:00:34 AM

    Comment: I am supporting Obama. After some thought, I welcome President Clinton and Hillary Clintons attacks. In fact, Obama should take the Clintons scrutiny and attacks with appreciation, respect, smile, and stride. That is, Obama should be saying, BRING IT ON!

    The American people want to know whether the candidates have the character to be President. In reality, there is more than enough information at the candidates websites regarding policy and plans. Therefore, the race is really less about issues, but more about character. And rightfully so!

    Obama has the character to be President of the United States. Consequently, he can handle anything the Clintons (or anybody) throw at him. It does not matter whether the accusations are fair or unfair. As President, you will be faced with fair and unfair criticism all of the time.

    So far, Obama has not let me down. Granted, hereon out, he may fall or trip occasionally. However, I am behind him all the way to the Presidency.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
PROJECT GREEN

Sustainable buildings are virtuous, but they can be ugly. Only a few designs are truly great.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu