SPONSORED BY:

Green-Listed

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

What countries have melded business opportunity and environmentalism most successfully?
The Scandinavian countries, in particular, have made investment in environmental business an important part of their economic base. For example, the largest solar power company is in Norway, which is number three on our list. A number of Swedish companies have made a good environment a part of their business model, IKEA being one example and Volvo another.

What can the United States, which has a relatively poor record on environmental issues, do from a governmental perspective?
The U.S. has slipped down a number of notches on this index; we're sitting at 39th place now. We have not put incentives in front of our business community to pay attention to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, to figure out energy efficiency strategies, to invest in alternative energies, or pursue opportunities like carbon capture and sequestration. But the U.S. business community, even without the government playing a helpful role, has begun to step up to these issues, because they perceive that there is a strong possibility of climate change controls coming with the next administration.

Who's been particularly good?
Take GE, for example. Under the famous Jack Welch, who was CEO until 2001, GE was kind of an environmental bad actor. They polluted the Hudson and Housatonic rivers, and Jack Welch fought the EPA for years about those cleanups. Jeff Immelt settled those cases and really turned GE in a dramatic way toward being an environmental solutions provider. They've got a huge investment in efficient locomotives, efficient jet engines, wind power, solar power, clean water—really, across the board. That's a dramatic redirection in the company.

In his book "Supercapitalism" former labor secretary Robert Reich argues that businesses will always put profits first and that corporate social responsibility efforts are a smokescreen.
I don't disagree. I think that those that think you're going to rely on corporate social responsibility to get done the important work of environmental protection are fooling themselves. But if government regulates in ways that are modern and smart and harness market forces, you can get a lot further for lower cost.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Harlequinade @ 01/24/2008 2:10:38 PM

    Why aren't people looking into batteries? How is Solar and Wind going to change the world into a greener place without the ability to harness and store the power until we need it? The research money needs to be pumped into making smaller batteries with the ability to store more power! Forget Biofuel! All the sun in the world would not make the nights light up and the cars go if we can't store that energy!

  • Posted By: kamalimd @ 01/23/2008 11:04:51 PM

    I agree with you, wind and solar aren't effective....YET.... Solar will one day, I doubt if wind ever will. It seems they can'y be profitable without tremendous government subsidies.

    I also agree that "biofuel" is a crock. Let's take food we eat, and now use it for fuel. Seems like a disaster waiting to happen. The only "biofuel" that looks promising is using the leftover vegetable oil, orshortening from fast food restaurants and turning it into fuel. Since it is basically turning trash into something productive. Besides that, I don't see how people can rationalize using food for fuel.

  • Posted By: slowhand @ 01/23/2008 6:09:24 PM

    You might want to do a little more research on the Kyoto protocol...many countries were not invited, or were given "immunity" for lack of a better word (I believe China was one of those). Many European countries were allowed to "buy" credits from other countries...Also, many of them were closing down old Soviet bloc inefficient power plants...in the last decade, we measure favorably with them...of course we're the #1 producer of CO2, do you know of any other country with the same combination of population, technology, land area, and standard of living? Man-made greenhouse gas makes up what, less than 5% of the total, and we're not even sure Kyoto would, if enacted by all countries, even affect that 5%...I'm in favor of finding better, cleaner fuels, and also of using niche energy sources in the right market (solar in AZ, for example), and I recycle...let's focus on real environmental and pollution issues, not a warming that has ebbed and flowed for thousands of years, regardless of us...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.