Should We Bomb Agrabah? Sure!

12_21_Agrabah_01
The cast of "Aladdin" performs "Friend Like Me" during the American Theatre Wing's 68th annual Tony Awards at Radio City Music Hall in New York, June 8, 2014. In a poll published December 18, Public Policy Polling asked a national survey of 1,057 primary voters, "Would you support or oppose bombing Agrabah?" Agrabah being the fictional country from the classic Disney movie "Aladdin." Carlo Allegri/Reuters

This article first appeared on the Anything Peaceful site.

Whenever pollsters get bored, they throw in an obvious joke question to see how ignorant voters really are. The answer is always " very."

In a poll published December 18, Public Policy Polling asked a national survey of 1,057 primary voters, "Would you support or oppose bombing Agrabah?"

Agrabah is, of course, the fictional, vaguely Arabic country from the classic Disney movie Aladdin.

In voters' defense, "Agrabah" does sound vaguely Islamic…and their undemocratic ruler has been recorded saying "Praise Allah!" Scary!

In all seriousness, the poll reveals a disturbing tendency among voters: many of them will support killing people just because they are asked.

Obviously, nobody who answered the poll had any clue what or where Agrabah was, and half of them had the good sense to admit that. But the people who offered an opinion were basing it on something.

The question implied to voters that (a) Agrabah exists, (b) it's probably a Muslim country in the Middle East, and (c) somebody had suggested that we bomb it. That is enough for about a quarter of Americans to conclude that blowing it up is probably a good idea.

The good news is that, no matter how popular it is, the United States can't actually bomb Agrabah, because it is safely in Imaginationland. The bad news is that there are a lot of very real countries, with a lot of very real people living in them, that the U.S. military can bomb at will.

If voters can be this easily persuaded to kill people they've never heard of—or no reason—how likely is it that they're forming a careful, rational, considered opinion about Syria? Or Libya? Or Yemen? Or Iraq? Or Afghanistan? Or Pakistan? Or Iran?

Another revealing point here is that Democrats look just as ignorant as Republicans in this poll. In fact, even more Democrats pretended to know what U.S.-Agrabah relations should be than did Republicans (55 percent to 43 percent).

But the liberal bias is against bombing foreign countries, whereas the conservative bias is toward it. All things being equal, that's a more ethical tendency, but that doesn't make their viewpoint any less ignorant.

And the fact that their beliefs aren't based on facts about reality makes them fragile and unreliable allies, at best. (Think, for instance, how the responses to the question would have changed if the pollster had asked, "Do you support President Obama's plan to bomb Agrabah?")

Most of the time, when well-informed people find themselves agreeing more with the left or the right, that doesn't mean the left or the right is actually more informed about an issue. Rather, they are just riding the same tide of ignorance, pulled in the right direction, coincidentally, by the forces of ideological bias and mood-affiliation.

Daniel Bier is editor of the Anything Peaceful blog on the Foundation for Economic Education site.