10
Loading video...
By Jill Yahnite
President
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
When a business trusts AI over human judgment and gets it wrong, it’s the employees who lose their jobs, the customers who get poor service, and the young professionals who lose the chance to learn.
AI can write your sales strategy, but it cannot take responsibility for whether that strategy destroys your business.
I have watched business owners hand ChatGPT or Claude a question about revenue growth, receive a polished sales playbook, and walk away believing the hard work is done.
Read More on Leadership Insights
It is an expensive illusion. A strategy that looks convincing on a screen can be completely wrong for the business expected to execute it, and the confidence with which AI delivers an answer makes that mistake particularly easy to miss.
As a fractional sales leader working with small and midsize businesses, I see executives trying to solve complicated commercial problems with tools they have not learned to question.
They ask AI to identify their ideal customers, recommend lead-generation platforms, build sales processes, and forecast growth.
The technology can produce useful starting points in seconds. The trouble begins when a starting point becomes a substitute for judgment.
I recently worked with a $2 million company whose CEO arrived at a meeting armed with an AI-generated recommendation for a lead-generation platform.
The suggestion was ZoomInfo. My recommendation was Apollo, which better suited the company’s budget and needs. The CEO had asked a chatbot for an answer, but the chatbot had not accounted for the commercial realities I was hired to understand.
That is precisely why experienced advisers exist. An answer can sound authoritative and still be unsuitable for the business asking the question.
Confusing Access to Expertise With Possession of Expertise
Similar problems appear across marketing, pricing, procurement, hiring, and sales forecasting. AI can help a team work faster and identify patterns it might otherwise miss.
Yet someone must judge whether the output reflects the market, the company’s customers, its resources, and its actual objectives. Someone must challenge the assumptions, decide what to implement, and monitor the consequences.
The danger is that business leaders are confusing access to expertise with possession of expertise. A subscription gives an executive access to a powerful system.
It does not give that executive the experience to recognize a flawed recommendation, the commercial instincts to test an assumption, or the leadership skills to turn a document into a working process.
We have seen this mistake in other forms of management before. Reading The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People can introduce someone to valuable principles; working through those principles with an experienced coach can reveal how to apply them under pressure.
AI makes information easier to obtain, but applying knowledge to a particular business still requires judgment.
Every reckless AI decision carries a human cost. Employees must live with the consequences of executive misjudgment, customers bear the brunt of failing services, and communities lose when businesses stumble.
The Dangers
Used with sound judgment, AI can strengthen companies, improve customer experiences, and equip workers with valuable skills.
Deployed without accountability, it can jeopardize livelihoods and saddle inexperienced employees with decisions they have neither the training nor the authority to make.
The damage to early-career talent deserves particular attention. Sales development representatives and junior marketing employees are already seeing routine tasks automated.
These roles have traditionally helped people learn how customers think, how commercial relationships develop, and how to handle rejection, negotiation and uncertainty.
Remove too many of those opportunities, and where will tomorrow’s sales directors gain the experience to lead?
I worry about companies appointing newly graduated employees to senior marketing positions on the assumption that AI will fill their experience gaps.
It is a reckless experiment with two casualties in the making: the business and the young professional whose career may suffer if the decisions go wrong.
AI can support someone’s development, but it cannot manufacture years of hard-won commercial judgment overnight.
The Importance of Scrutiny
There is another problem executives need to confront. AI systems can produce false or misleading information, and their fluency can make errors difficult to detect.
Their capabilities and commercial terms also change quickly. Businesses committing to annual software contracts without reviewing their actual needs may find themselves paying for tools that no longer suit their operations.
Technology procurement requires the same scrutiny as any other business investment.
I also expect the sales process itself to become increasingly absurd if automation advances without human oversight. AI voice agents may call prospects whose own automated agents answer, negotiate appointments, and fill calendars.
Eventually, two people could arrive at a meeting neither of them knowingly arranged. The technology will have completed its task; the business will have gained nothing.
The answer is to design automation around genuine customer needs and measurable commercial outcomes, not activity for its own sake.
Responsible Leadership
My argument is not that businesses should retreat from AI. They must embrace AI with their eyes open.
Every tool should solve a defined problem, every recommendation should withstand scrutiny, and every implementation should have an experienced person accountable for its results.
If the technology cannot demonstrate measurable gains in revenue, retention, or productivity, executives must have the discipline to question its value and the courage to walk away.
AI adoption is not a proof of strategic competence. Despite its prowess, boards and executive teams need to have a named human owner for every consequential AI-driven initiative and measurable criteria for continuing, changing, or abandoning it.
Fund the expertise required to make these systems work, and protect the training pathways that will produce the next generation of capable leaders.
Your competitors are experimenting, learning, and adapting. You cannot afford to stand still, but neither can you afford to confuse speed with progress.
AI can help a business move faster. Only responsible leadership can determine whether it is moving in the right direction.
Jill Yahnite is president of Sales & Beyond and a Sales Xceleration adviser offering paid fractional sales leadership and AI implementation services.
All opinions are the author’s own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines