10
Loading video...
By Doug Benoit
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Employers must stop treating workplace wellness as a benefits package and start using it to identify potential health concerns earlier. Artificial intelligence could make preventive health more accessible, but only if businesses put privacy, consent, and professional oversight ahead of profits.
The stakes reach far beyond the office. When employees struggle with stress, anxiety, depression, or other health concerns, their families, colleagues, and employers feel the consequences.
Yet many organizations still rely on annual assessments, voluntary questionnaires, and benefits that do little to reveal problems developing beneath the surface. A gym membership is not the same as helping someone recognize when something may be wrong.
Read More on Leadership Insights
The latest evidence should get every business leader’s attention. The American Psychological Association’s 2026 Work in America survey found that 95 percent of workers consider it important to work for an organization that values emotional and psychological well-being. Yet the share describing their workplace as healthy fell from 85 percent in 2025 to 80 percent in 2026.
More workers also reported feeling tense or stressed at work.
The financial pressure is growing, too. KFF’s 2026 Employer Health Benefits Survey found that average annual family premiums reached $28,303, up five percent in a year, while workers’ average contribution rose to $7,471. Employers cannot confuse spending on benefits with proof that those benefits work. The question is whether people get useful support before a concern becomes a crisis.
AI-Assisted Screening Can Identify Health Concerns
That is why responsible AI-assisted screening deserves serious consideration. Properly designed tools may identify patterns that warrant further assessment, prompting employees to seek qualified advice earlier. But screening is not a diagnosis. An algorithm cannot establish disease, determine fitness for work, or replace a clinician. Its role is to flag a possible concern and help someone take an informed next step.
I know how difficult it can be to navigate care when the need is pressing. Long waits and complicated pathways can leave people struggling to find help. That experience shaped my belief that earlier awareness matters. But awareness creates responsibility.
If employers identify possible needs without connecting workers to support, screening becomes an empty gesture. A result without follow-up is just another report in an already crowded inbox.
Some leaders will be tempted to look away. Identifying widespread stress or other concerns can expose gaps that cost time and money to address. Ignorance may feel easier now. Later, hidden problems can affect health, attendance, performance, retention, and families. A company that wants insight must accept the obligation to respond. Employees should never have to wonder whether being honest about their health will put their job at risk.
Imagine employees voluntarily accessing credible screening, understanding what results can and cannot say, and receiving timely guidance from qualified professionals. Employers could spot broader patterns, direct resources where needed, and build wellness programs around evidence rather than guesswork. People would have a better chance of seeking help before a concern escalates. Trust would grow because the purpose is support, not scrutiny.
The alternative is troubling: unproven systems marketed as surveillance, sensitive information collected without meaningful consent, and questionable scores used to judge workers. False alarms create anxiety, and missed signals create false reassurance. Employees conceal concerns, managers rely on unreliable information, and organizations spend money while destroying the trust that makes wellness programs work. That is another route to failure.
Employers should act, but not by buying the first AI product marketed to them. Audit existing wellness programs. Ask what problems they address and whether employees can access meaningful follow-up. Before a screening pilot, demand independent evidence of usefulness, clear information about limitations and false positives, strong cybersecurity, defined data-retention rules, and explicit, voluntary consent.
Moving to More Informed and All-round Support
Separate individual health information from hiring, promotion, discipline, and performance decisions. Involve clinicians, workers, privacy specialists, and legal advisers. Measure outcomes and employee trust, not scans performed or hypothetical savings.
AI could move workplace wellness from disconnected benefits toward earlier, more informed support. Or it could turn workplaces into places where people feel watched rather than cared for. The difference will be the standards employers set before switching it on.
Audit your programs, demand evidence, build a genuine follow-up process, and give employees control over their information. Their health must never become the price of efficiency.
Doug Benoit serves as the CEO of FacialDx, an AI organization specializing in facial analysis and wellness intelligence. All opinions are the author’s own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines