10
Loading video...
By Anil Melwani
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
American small business owners are making consequential financial decisions with tax strategies that often amount to little more than an annual appointment with an accountant.
That disconnect is becoming increasingly expensive. As businesses expand across state lines, employees work remotely, and owners accumulate property and investments in multiple jurisdictions, treating taxes as a once-a-year obligation is no longer merely inefficient.
It puts business profitability, personal wealth, and long-term financial security at risk.
Read More on Leadership Insights
The problem is not that entrepreneurs fail to understand their businesses. It is that many underestimate how profoundly growth and operational changes can affect their tax position.
...
Hiring employees in another state, acquiring property, admitting a partner, or relocating may introduce tax considerations, depending on the circumstances and applicable state laws.
These decisions may be commercially sound, but without planning in advance, they could involve additional filing considerations, potential tax exposure, penalties, or avoidable costs.
Research published by Gusto, a U.S. payroll and human resources platform for small businesses, in October illustrates how quickly this complexity can emerge.
Its analysis found that approximately one in 10 small businesses opening a second location expanded into another state.
Nine in 10 businesses entering a new state did so by hiring a single employee, and roughly five in six of those states had no physical office.
A company no longer needs a building, storefront, or formal expansion plan to raise questions about its potential state tax responsibilities when its workforce operates across state lines.
Even a single hiring decision may warrant a closer look.
Growth Changes the Tax Picture
This is a fundamental shift in how businesses operate, and owners must adjust accordingly.
Geographic expansion has become easier, but state tax obligations have not become simpler. The commercial world may be increasingly borderless; the American tax system is not.
The consequences extend well beyond the business itself. Depending on how a business is structured, its income may be reported and taxed at the business level, at the individual owner level, or through a combination of both.
For owners whose business income flows through to their personal tax returns, business tax decisions can also have a direct impact on their individual financial position.
The funds used to pay income taxes are often sourced from the same account that supports the household, finances investments, and/or builds retirement security.
Protecting Personal Wealth
That connection makes tax planning a matter of personal financial protection, not simply business administration. An owner who fails to make adequate estimated payments may face penalties and interest.
An owner who neglects the tax implications of an investment or eventual business sale may surrender a substantial portion of future gains unnecessarily. These are not abstract accounting problems. They affect how much wealth a family ultimately keeps.
Much of this complacency is rooted in the cultural significance of April 15. Americans have been conditioned to associate taxes with a deadline rather than an ongoing financial responsibility.
Yet business filing deadlines vary, and an extension generally provides additional time to file a return, not additional time to pay the tax owed. By the time an owner discovers a shortfall, the opportunity to plan around it may already have disappeared.
Preparation Versus Advice
In my experience, the distinction between tax preparation and tax advisory is critical. Preparation documents the consequences of decisions already made. Advisory work helps owners understand the tax implications before making those decisions.
It means reviewing estimated payments throughout the year, evaluating whether business activities in multiple states may trigger tax or reporting requirements, considering the consequences of relocation, and evaluating whether a business’s structure remains appropriate as its operations and assets evolve.
This requires a relationship built on communication and an understanding of the owner’s complete financial circumstances.
An accountant who sees the books only during tax season cannot reliably provide the same forward-looking guidance as an adviser who engages with the business regularly.
Monthly or quarterly reviews are not unnecessary overhead when they identify exposure early, preserve options, and prevent avoidable costs.
Proactive Approach
Business owners should examine that relationship now, before another hiring decision, property purchase, or expansion raises tax questions that could have been addressed in advance.
Ask your accountant which states may have relevant tax or reporting requirements based on your business activities, whether estimated payments reflect current income, and how today’s decisions could affect your personal wealth over the next decade.
Demand specific answers and a proactive plan. If the relationship consists primarily of exchanging documents once a year, find an adviser whose involvement matches the complexity of your business.
The difference is consequential. Proactive planning gives owners greater control over their liabilities, more confidence to pursue growth, and a better chance of preserving the wealth their businesses generate.
Reactive compliance leaves them paying for mistakes that foresight could have prevented. Building a successful business is difficult enough.
Owners should not allow an outdated approach to taxes to undermine what they have worked so hard to build.
Anil Melwani, CPA, is president of 212 Tax Services, an accounting and tax advisory firm with offices in Charlotte, Miami, and New York City; all opinions are the author’s own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines