Tel Aviv Diary: American Jews and Israelis—We Really Need to Talk | Opinion

GettyImages-945041026
Stock image: Israeli flag flying in Jerusalem. iStock

For the first time in history, the General Assembly (GA) of the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) are holding their annual conference in Tel Aviv. For the last several decades the federations have met in Israel, every fifth year in Jerusalem. Until now.

The GA’s 2018 conference theme is “We Need to Talk,” a reflection of challenges faced by the partnership between Israel and American Jewry during the last two years; challenges that are in part a function of profound shifts, which impact the relationship between Israel and Diaspora Jewry.

Last year, North American Jewish federations transferred $113.4 million to Israel, a sum that is considerably less than the $200 million American Jews gifted Israel in 1948 (in absolute dollars). To put this into perspective, Israeli startups raised over $5 billion last year.

Once upon a time, the Jewish business leaders of Tel Aviv would have welcomed wealthy American Jewish leaders, to lean on their expertise and connections. Today, with 360 of the largest companies on Earth maintaining facilities in Israel, such meetings are superfluous.

Once upon a time, GA attendees would include the richest of American Jewry. However, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Bloomberg, Sergei Brin are not among the attendees of the GA today.

Through its United Jewish Appeal division, the Federated world once organized their efforts around the theme of raising money for the “poor Israeli cousins.” Today, many Israeli cousins are wealthier than their American counterparts.

There are profound political differences between American Jews and Israelis. According to the Pew Research Center, the United States in 2018, is viewed favorably by 83% of Israelis (the highest number in the world, matched only by the Philippines)—a statistic which mirrors the favorable rating President Donald Trump himself received from Israelis. In contrast, only 25% of American Jews give Trump a positive job approval score.

American Jews overwhelmingly support a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict; a bare plurality of Israelis currently share that view. American Jews who overwhelmingly affiliate with either the Reform or the Conservative movement have been disappointed by the failure of the Israeli government to keep its promise to implement an agreement to create a non-Orthodox, prayer space at the Western Wall; most Israelis barely see the lack of pluralistic prayer options at the Western Wall as an issue. The list of differences goes on.

Some in the American Jewish community believe the current government of Israel prefers to seek support from the like-minded, conservative Evangelical Christian community, rather than nurturing connections with more liberal American Jews.

No one conference can provide sufficient time, resources and opportunities to successfully bridge such differences—and any expectation that a conference whose theme is “We Need to Talk” can actually discuss and debate all of the dissimilarity into full understanding and agreement is overly optimistic. Nevertheless, the relationship between Israel and American Jews is too important to allow these problems to fester without being seriously addressed.

Despite all of the favorable economic statistics cited above, and regardless of Israel’s military strength, the governments of Israel have historically counted on World Jewry—and particularly American Jewry—as their secret reserve; i.e. the ones who will always be there to support the country in time of need, as they have done since the early Zionist days.

For World Jewry, Israel serves as the dynamic center of renewed Jewish life, where they can visit, send their children to study—and yes if times get rough (in any part of the world), Israel is a haven where Jews can move if need be.

If this symbiotic relationship is to survive and prosper, it will require a renewed multi-year approach to finding ways to bridge the gap between the communities—to both understand each other better and find mutual goals and projects to rebuild fraying bonds—before it is too late.

Rhetoric will not be enough. Instead, new approaches need to be found not only to keep those who already engaged in the relationship but to find a way to engage a whole new generation growing up both in the US and in Israel, with very different experiences and values.

President Reuven "Rubi" Rivlin spoke at the opening of the Assembly and called for an update to the famous Blaustein–Ben-Gurion Agreement of 1951, which defined Israel’s relations with American Jewry as “deep mutual responsibility and noninterference.” He called for the creation of joint projects between American Jewry and Israel to help other peoples in the world—an interesting suggestion and a good beginning.

It is easy to keep doing what one has been doing for generations. However, the fundamentals have changed and now the time has come to throw out the playbook and redefine a new relationship, and responses that reflects our very different time.

Marc Schulman is a multimedia historian.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own.​​

Join the Discussion