Black Lives Matter: Which Way Will Republican Wannabes Jump?

09_02_BlackLivesMatter_01
Protesters carry signs during a demonstration by Black Lives Matter in Los Angeles on August 11. Democratic candidates are starting to talk more police, prison and criminal reform. Not so much on the GOP side, the author writes. Phil McCarten/Reuters

This article first appeared on Reason.com.

As Black Lives Matter unveils its specific demands for police reform, it's worth noting that all the Democratic presidential candidates have at the very least started to pay lip service to the movement's quiver of issues.

Jim Webb, of course, was talking about this stuff before it was trendy. But now the candidates with the worst records on mass incarceration—Hillary Clinton and Martin O'Malley—have each made a big show of embracing reform. (When former Reason writer Radley Balko took a look at what the major candidates' websites say about criminal justice, O'Malley turned out to have the most detailed discussion.) Bernie Sanders is saying more too: After BLM protesters disrupted some of his campaign events, he added a bunch of planks about policing to his site.

You can question these people's sincerity. You can fault some of their proposals. You can observe that they sometimes simultaneously take positions, like O'Malley's push for stronger gun controls, that could make mass incarceration worse. I'm not endorsing anyone here; I'm just highlighting the rhetoric. Politicians are weathervanes, and this is where the wind near these candidates has been blowing.

Not so on the GOP side. Rand Paul stresses this set of issues, and there are other Republicans running—Rick Perry, Ted Cruz—who at least address them.

Others ignore it or worse. Mike Huckabee, who had a relatively humane record in this area when he was governor of Arkansas, had the most authoritarian criminal-justice posture in Balko's roundup. And while Huckabee has his own reasons to try to look tough on crime, he's also running at a time when a post-Ferguson backlash has been bubbling in much of the right. So he isn't the only candidate who's trying to talk tough.

His party's current front-runner, who leaped into the lead after announcing an alleged epidemic of Mexican assaults, has said that if Black Lives Matter activists try to disrupt one of his events, "I don't know if I'll do the fighting myself or if other people will...but believe me, that's not gonna happen to Trump."

Now BLM activists are starting to show up at Republican rallies. Good for them: Both parties deserve to be protested. But as that becomes more common, forcing the GOP's would-be presidents either to talk about cops and prisons or to be more conspicuously silent, what happens next?

Will the alliance of libertarians, evangelicals and bean counters who've been making inroads for reform on the right be able to influence the candidates' responses? Or will criminal justice reform get branded as a Democratic issue: a collection of concerns that conservatives shrink away from because they associate it with the left?

If it's the latter, it'll only be easier for the candidates on the Democratic side to get away with offering little more than lip service.

Jesse Walker is books editor of Reason magazine. He is author of Rebels on the Air: An Alternative History of Radio in America (New York University Press, 2001) and The United States of Paranoia: A Conspiracy Theory (HarperCollins, 2013).

Black Lives Matter: Which Way Will Republican Wannabes Jump? | Opinion