Both Sides Want to Bring Back Glass-Steagall

07_29_Glass_Steagall_01
A Wall Street street sign outside of the New York Stock Exchange. Elaine Kamarck writes that the presence of a pro-Glass-Steagall plank in both political parties' platforms means we can bet on seeing a tougher attitude toward the financial industry in 2017. Carlo Allegri/reuters

This article first appeared on the Brookings Institution site.

Both political parties' platforms this year call for reinstating a version of the Glass-Steagall Act.

Glass-Steagall is a Depression-era law that separated commercial and investment banking activity. It was effectively repealed in 1999 under President Bill Clinton and replaced by the Gramm Leach-Bliley Act.

When the Great Recession hit in 2008 and revealed the casino-like operations of many on Wall Street, attention turned to the wisdom—or lack thereof—of repealing Glass-Steagall. Not surprisingly, it became a rallying cry on the left and on the right for those who thought Wall Street had become too powerful and too reckless.

A year ago, Hillary Clinton gave a very powerful economic speech in which she called for an end to "short-termism" on Wall Street and for tougher controls on big banks. But that aspect of the speech was largely ignored, and given the fact that she represented New York state in the Senate and had many contributors from the world of finance, Bernie Sanders was able to make her out as a puppet of Wall Street.

At that time, she did not endorse reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, arguing that there were other ways to get to the same results. And there is a legitimate debate over the wisdom of reinstating Glass-Steagall instead of enforcing other rules on the books, such as those in the Dodd-Frank law.

Nonetheless, as the political year went on, reinstatement of Glass-Steagall assumed a symbolic significance.

But by agreeing to place reinstatement of Glass-Steagall in the Democratic platform, Clinton signaled that she too would support it.

Of course, as they say, the devil is in the details. The Democratic platform calls for a wide variety of other financial regulation in addition to Glass-Steagall, while the Republican platform states that Dodd-Frank is "crushing small and community banks and other lenders" and calls for abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

But in terms of political significance, the presence of the same plank in both party platforms means that the one thing we can bet on seeing in 2017 is a tougher attitude toward the financial industry.

To date, there hasn't been much interest in this in Congress. But if the establishment heard one thing loud and clear in the 2016 primaries, it was that millions of Americans think that they were the victims of Wall Street and that the next president had better pay attention.

Elaine C. Kamarck is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and author of Primary Politics: Everything You Need to Know about How America Nominates Its Presidential Candidates. She is a superdelegate to the Democratic Convention.

brookingslogo
Brookings