After Florida's mask mandate ban was overturned last week, Governor Ron DeSantis faces another legal test over a controversial new law tied to crimes committed at protests.
The law is designed to deter violent public demonstrations, but challengers of the law say it is unconstitutionally chilling free speech and the right to peacefully protest. Max Gaston, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, was among the attorneys representing those in opposition to the law.
"Their speech is chilled because they don't know if they will be arrested for peacefully protesting," Gaston said. "They're afraid they will be arrested and charged with a violent felony."
Attorneys challenging the law championed by DeSantis asked U.S. District Judge Mark Walker to block enforcement of key parts of the law during a hearing in Tallahassee.
For more reporting from the Associated Press, see below:
The law could sweep up people who are merely in the same area as a protest that turns violent or who are involved in the event but not doing anything illegal, Gaston said.
"It can be taken to mean a lot of things to a regular police officer on his beat," he said of the law.
Joining the lawsuit are the NAACP Florida conference, Dream Defenders, Black Lives Matter Alliance Broward, and other groups who claim the law appears specifically aimed to quell protests by Black people and other minorities.
Walker did not immediately rule during the hearing held by teleconference. "I will do my best to get an order out as soon as possible," the judge said.
DeSantis signed the so-called anti-riot bill into law in April. He had urged the state Legislature to pass a measure to enhance penalties against violent protesters after last year's tumultuous demonstrations over the treatment of Black people by police.
Those demonstrations followed last year's killing in Minneapolis police custody of George Floyd, a Black man, that stirred passions nationwide under the banner of the Black Lives Matter Movement.
Lawyers for DeSantis contend in court papers that the lawsuit is misguided and the law does not illegally constrain free speech or the right to assembly as guaranteed by the Constitution.
"It does not prohibit or discourage peaceful demonstration. Nor does it single out speech regarding racial justice," the governor's attorneys wrote. "Americans have a Constitutional right to free speech—they do not have a right to burn down buildings, destroy property, or inflict bodily harm on others."
The law, also known as HB1, stiffens penalties for crimes committed during a riot or violent protest. It allows authorities to detain arrested protesters until a first court appearance and establishes new felonies for organizing or participating in a violent demonstration.
It also makes it a second-degree felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to destroy or demolish a memorial, plaque, flag, painting, structure or other objects that commemorate historical people or events.
In addition, the measure requires that local governments justify any reductions in law enforcement budgets.
