...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
After weeks of disruption and brinkmanship, the Senate approved a plan to reopen most of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but without new funding for ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations and parts of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Lawmakers couldn't reach a grand bargain on immigration enforcement. They simply ran out of runway, and the pressure on both sides to end the shutdown only intensified, as TSA staff shortages began to cause long delays and traveler chaos at airports.
President Donald Trump's move to direct DHS to pay TSA officers during the lapse eased immediate pressure while talks stalled. It was clear the situation couldn't last. Everyone would have to take the L.
Read More on Analysis
Why the Democrats Lost
Democrats can argue they held the line against what Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called a "blank check" for ICE and Border Patrol, especially after the Minnesota shootings that spurred their push for reform.
They repeatedly tied DHS funding to enforcement guardrails. But strategically, they lost: the shutdown ended without the core reforms they demanded.
There may be no new funding for ICE or Border Patrol, already funded through Trump’s term via the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but none of the new rules they called urgent were secured.
Even the most concrete reform—$20 million for body cameras—looks more like a partial concession than a structural reset.
Democrats blocked additional enforcement funding but failed to secure durable oversight. Republicans are already signaling they may try to restore funding later through party-line measures.
What's more, the DHS story shifted from ICE to the TSA. What began as a compelling case against the excesses of immigration enforcement ended as a travel chaos issue. Democrats had lost control of the narrative.
And Democrats still have not arrived at a broader consensus on immigration and the border that heals old wounds from blows landed in the elections of recent years.
Why the Republicans Lost
Republicans lost the leverage battle and then tried to pass it off as a tactical regroup.
The Senate adopted a Democratic approach. Fund DHS broadly while carving out ICE removal operations and parts of CBP. It's the opposite of the clean funding Republicans typically prefer.
"The Dems wanted reforms. We tried to work with them on reforms. They ended up getting no reforms," Majority Leader John Thune said, calling the outcome "unfortunate".
He added: "But, you know, we’re going to have to fight some of those battles another day."
It is a line that paints Democrats as irrational while also conceding Republicans didn't secure their preferred end state either.
Trump's TSA pay directive also weakened Republican leverage by easing airport chaos, which was the most visible pressure point driving urgency.
Republicans got the shutdown ended, but they did it by swallowing an unpalatable carve-out and with their own president removing a large piece of their political leverage.
MAGA is likely to interpret this as weakness, especially to those, like Trump, who want the party to end the filibuster so it can govern more aggressively and without needing bipartisan compromises that cater to a legislative minority.
The result risks fueling internal GOP conflict.
Why American Voters Lost
For voters, Washington only moved once governing broke down, in another sign of the elite political dysfunction that has so often frustrated Americans and disrupted their everyday lives.
As the shutdown dragged on, TSA staffing and airport lines became a national symbol of that dysfunction. In fact, more than a symbol, it was a real-world experience of its consequences.
Independents, whose votes in purple states and districts ultimately decide elections, don't need a partisan lens to see the problem. Critical services faltered because lawmakers used agency funding as a bargaining chip in a fight that wasn't resolved.
Voters also lose because the deal doesn't resolve core questions about immigration enforcement or oversight.
Polling shows most Americans agree that immigration rules should be properly enforced. It's on tactics and accountability where the debate really is.
Neither has been meaningfully addressed.
The shutdown ended without a comprehensive set of rules that could reassure liberal skeptics of enforcement or immigration hawks that enforcement will be sustained.
There's also a quieter loss. The resolution reinforces a cycle where leaders accept a messy patch (meaning pain for Americans), declare a kind of victory in defeat where little is truly resolved, and head out onto the next crisis.
The Senate passed the package by voice vote in the early hours. Efficient, but emblematic of how major congressional conflicts often end with minimal transparency.
Where This Funding Fight Goes Next
Next is the House. The Senate deal reopens most of DHS, but its fate depends on whether House Republicans accept a compromise that excludes ICE removal operations and parts of CBP.
Action could come quickly, but the narrow Republican majority raises the risk that the deal unravels.
A small number of House Republicans can become very powerful if they choose to take a stand on funding ICE and CBP.
And there are plenty of immigration hawks in the House looking to make a name for themselves. ICE funding has become a symbolic test for parts of the GOP.
The bigger question: Will Republicans try to backfill enforcement money through reconciliation?
GOP leaders have discussed using the party-line process to add funding without Democratic votes, turning this into a two-track strategy, one that keeps DHS open with bipartisan support while boosting enforcement unilaterally.
Democrats would likely shift to an aggressive accountability strategy, using oversight hearings, litigation from states like Minnesota, and demands for transparency on body cameras, training, and operations.
The enforcement war is heading into a new phase.
Worst of Both Worlds
The Senate deal reopens most of DHS, but it reads less like a governing breakthrough than a mutual retreat from a political sinkhole.
Democrats blocked new enforcement funding but secured few reforms. Republicans ended the shutdown but accepted a carve-out that signals lost leverage.
Voters got the worst of both worlds. Weeks of disruption followed by a patch that delays, rather than resolves, the core dispute.
The shutdown is ending. The fight that caused it isn’t.
Hey gang, Carlo Versano here. I hope you enjoyed this article. As Newsweek's Director of Politics and Culture and editor of the 1600 newsletter, I'm keen to hear what you think. Now, Newsweek is offering a new service to allow you to communicate directly with me in the form of a text message chat. You can sign up and get a direct line to me, as well as the reporters who work for me. You can shape our coverage.
As a Newsweek member, we're offering this service to you for free. You can sign up below, or read more about how it works here. Let's talk!
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines