10
Loading video...
By Eslam Essam
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Advertising determines what we see, what we discover, and, increasingly, which businesses get the chance to be seen at all. For any consumer, that shapes the choices available to them. For businesses, it can determine whether a good product ever finds an audience.
Market.us forecasts that the global advertising services market will reach $3,865.5 billion by 2035, powered by data, automation and artificial intelligence. It is often presented as more accessible than ever. In reality, it has become structurally less accessible for the very businesses that need it most.
I see this gap every day. Small and mid-sized businesses are told that digital advertising is the great equalizer. They are taught that with the right tools, the right creatives, and the right targeting, they can compete with anyone. What they are not told is that the system they are entering was never designed with their constraints in mind.
Read More on Leadership Insights
The modern advertising ecosystem optimizes for scale. Platforms can reward high spenders as larger advertisers benefit from being able to run more tests and accumulating more conversion data over time. The more data a campaign generates, the more effectively machine learning systems can optimize performance. That creates a feedback loop where larger budgets produce better results, which in turn justifies even greater investment.
For smaller businesses, this dynamic creates an invisible barrier to entry.
Automation Replaces Human Control
Ten years ago, advertisers had more control. Manual bidding allowed businesses to dictate how much they were willing to pay per click or impression. Campaigns could be adjusted in real time with limited budgets.
Today, automation has replaced much of that control. AI-driven systems require significant data inputs to function effectively. Data requires time. Time requires sustained spending.
In practical terms, this means a business may need to invest tens of thousands of dollars before seeing meaningful returns. The system needs to learn. It needs to test audiences, platforms, devices, and behaviors.
It needs to run continuously to identify patterns such as when customers are most active, where they are located, and how they convert. These signals form the foundation of performance marketing.
Without sufficient signals, optimization does not happen.
For a well-funded company, this is a manageable investment phase. For a small business, it can be the entire marketing budget for a year.
Research from Deloitte and McKinsey has consistently shown that organizations with greater data maturity outperform their peers in marketing efficiency and return on investment. The implication is clear. Performance is tied to data, and data is tied to scale.
This is where the structural imbalance becomes critical.
Why Some Businesses Struggle
A business spending $300 a day may believe it is investing meaningfully in growth. In reality, it is often operating below the threshold required for optimization. Campaigns become inconsistent. Results fluctuate. Decisions are made without reliable data. Over time, this leads to frustration and wasted resources.
I have reached a point where I have had to turn away businesses that fall below certain spending thresholds. Not because they lack potential, but because I know the system will not deliver for them in its current form. That is a difficult position for any agency to take. It also reflects a broader industry truth that is rarely acknowledged openly.
The consequences extend beyond individual businesses. They are reshaping entire markets.
When visibility depends on sustained investment, those with greater financial resources can dominate attention. Smaller players can struggle to maintain a presence regardless of product quality or customer experience. Over time, the competitive landscape narrows. The middle tier of businesses begins to disappear.
That should concern anyone who values economic resilience. Small and mid-sized businesses are important sources of employment, innovation, and local economic activity. If they cannot compete through the primary channels of customer acquisition, their long-term viability becomes harder to sustain.
Two Possible Futures
In the optimistic version, AI makes advertising genuinely more accessible. Automation reduces complexity, smaller businesses gain sophisticated targeting capabilities without enormous budgets, and technology lowers the cost of reaching the right customers. A local business with a strong product can find its audience without having to behave like a multinational corporation.
The alternative is a more concentrated advertising economy. If optimization continues to favor scale without meaningful alternatives for smaller advertisers, larger companies will have an increasingly disproportionate ability to buy attention. Independent businesses may disappear, markets may become less diverse, and consumers may ultimately have fewer choices.
So what should smaller businesses do? The answer is ‘Don’t compete at the same level.’ Change the level of competition entirely.
Businesses with limited budgets should think locally and incrementally. Instead of targeting entire cities or countries, focus on specific neighborhoods or tightly defined customer segments. Instead of scaling immediately, dominate small pockets of demand and expand gradually.
I have seen businesses run multiple micro-campaigns targeting small geographic areas and build awareness step by step. This generates fewer data points, but it can create something equally valuable in the early stages: recognition and trust within a defined community. From there, growth can become more sustainable.
This is not a perfect solution. It is a workaround.
The larger issue remains unresolved, and it requires action from businesses, agencies, educators, and platforms. Businesses should stop measuring themselves against strategies built for companies with vastly different resources and instead build focused, measurable campaigns around the customers they can realistically reach.
Agencies should develop lower-budget models rather than treating spending thresholds as the only measure of viability. Educators should teach resource-constrained strategies alongside enterprise playbooks. And platforms should continue exploring ways to make their automated systems useful to advertisers operating at different levels of scale.
Advertising should expand opportunity, not determine who can afford to participate.
Right now, it does not. And ignoring that reality does not make the problem disappear. It accelerates it.
The technology already exists. The question is whether we will use it to widen access or allow scale to become the price of entry.
Eslam Essam is the founder of ParaGuru, a media-buying agency that sells campaign strategy, data-management and advertising-automation services. The views expressed are his own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines