...
By Jesus Mesa
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
When Donald Trump and Gustavo Petro meet at the White House on Tuesday, the encounter will cap one of the most volatile stretches in modern U.S.-Colombian relations—and test whether a fragile thaw can hold.
- Essential Reading: The US Is in Beta as China Changes the Game
- How Trump’s Nuclear Brinkmanship Is Forcing Iran’s Hand
- Conventional Wisdom: Trump Kennedy Center Edition
Just months ago, the two presidents were trading insults and sanctions. Now, Trump is striking a notably warmer tone. “I look forward to seeing him,” Trump said Monday. “We’re going to be talking about drugs because a tremendous amount of drugs come out of his country. We’re going to have a good meeting.”
Read More on Politics
Over the past year, the two leaders threatened tariffs, revoked visas and pushed the U.S.-Colombian alliance to its most tenuous point in decades. Trump accused Petro of presiding over a narco-state. Petro accused the United States of imperialism and denounced U.S. military operations in the Caribbean and Pacific. At one point, Trump even floated the idea of military action.
But after a surprise phone call in early January and rapid diplomatic softening, the Colombian president is arriving in Washington for what aides on both sides describe as a high-stakes, tightly choreographed encounter—one that could either stabilize a critical hemispheric partnership or produce another public rupture.
For U.S. officials and former diplomats, the timing of the meeting is as striking as the turnaround itself. Petro is entering the final months of his presidency, and Washington is confronting immediate crises—from Venezuela to narcotics flows—that cannot wait for Colombia’s next election.
...
“The Trump administration remains deeply focused on Venezuela and drugs and will seek Colombian cooperation on both,” said Kevin Whitaker, former U.S. ambassador to Colombia during Trump’s first term. “But Petro only has six months left in office, which raises a real question about why President Trump accepted the meeting at all, knowing there will be a new Colombian president on August 7.”
Trump, who personally invited Petro to the White House, has suggested the reset followed a turning point in the region. “He’s been very nice over the last month or two,” he said. “He was certainly critical before that. Somehow after the Venezuelan raid, he changed his attitude.”
That reference—to the January U.S. operation that extracted Nicolás Maduro from Caracas—still looms over Tuesday’s meeting. “Undoubtedly. Nicolás Maduro—or any president in the world—can be removed if he does not agree with certain interests,” Petro said in an interview with El País, when asked whether he feared meeting the same fate as Maduro.
A Relationship on the Brink
For decades, Colombia was Washington’s most reliable security partner in Latin America, the centerpiece of a bipartisan counternarcotics and counterinsurgency strategy that funneled billions of dollars into the country under Plan Colombia and its successors.
But the partnership had already begun to fray before Petro took office. In the final years of former President Iván Duque, relations with the Biden administration cooled after Colombian political figures were seen in Washington as aligning with Trump during the 2020 campaign.
The strain deepened after Petro, a former leftist guerrilla and outspoken critic of U.S. drug policy, assumed office in 2022. His government shifted away from forced coca eradication, pursued negotiations with armed groups and adopted a more confrontational foreign policy posture toward Washington.
...
Relations deteriorated further when Petro and Trump coincided in office, with disputes over deportation flights, Petro’s criticism of Trump’s immigration policies and sharp disagreements over U.S. support for Israel in Gaza compounding an already fragile alliance.
“The possibility of a rupture is real,” said Gimena Sánchez-Garzoli, director for the Andes at the Washington Office on Latin America. “The U.S.-Colombia partnership hit its lowest point in recent history over the past year. At the same time, it is in the interest of both countries to prevent relations from deteriorating further, because cooperation is essential to address drug trafficking, transnational crime, and the risk of further destabilization in Venezuela.”
Benjamin Gedan, senior fellow and Director of the Latin America Program at the Stimson Center, struck a similarly cautious note.
“The Trump-Petro meeting is a high-wire act,” Gedan said. “Both are short-tempered, unconstrained by diplomatic decorum, and disagree on most issues. A blowup, either in the Oval Office or later on social media, is more likely.”
Drugs and a Latin America Pivot
Publicly, the agenda for Tuesday’s meeting centers on counternarcotics cooperation, security, migration and Venezuela. Privately, both leaders face powerful domestic incentives to appear strong—and unyielding.
For Trump, Colombia has become part of a broader Latin American pivot. The administration’s National Security Strategy identifies the Western Hemisphere as the top priority region, with an explicit focus on limiting the influence of China, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah while securing access to strategic resources.
There is also the size of Colombia’s drug economy, which continues to shape the relationship. U.N. data shows coca cultivation reached roughly 253,000 hectares in 2023, the highest level in decades, while potential cocaine production surged more than 50 percent, to about 2,664 metric tons. These figures have drawn concern in Washington, where calls for a shared-responsibility approach have long gained limited traction.
For Petro, the stakes are electoral. Colombia holds legislative elections in March and a presidential vote in May, with left-wing Senator Iván Cepeda leading early polls, and relations with Washington have become a central political fault line at home.
...
“The Colombian right has encouraged poor relations with the Trump administration because it allows them to blame Petro,” Sánchez-Garzoli said. “If Petro pulls off a meeting where Colombia comes out on top, it deflates that messaging.”
Former Colombian diplomats are also cautiously optimistic, emphasizing that the meeting itself already represents a narrow diplomatic win.
“Trump’s invitation was significant—respectful, even affectionate,” said Julio Londoño Paredes, a former Colombian foreign minister who advised Petro ahead of the visit. “We were on the brink of confrontation. This opens a door.”
Camilo Reyes, Colombia’s first ambassador to the United States during Trump’s first term, said the meeting carries strategic importance after months of escalation.
“I think it’s a good opportunity to fix relations between Colombia and the United States,” Reyes said. “Although there have been differences between Trump and Petro, that has also deteriorated relations between the two states. What Colombians expect is that those differences can be bridged and that guidelines for cooperation can be reestablished.”
The Venezuela Question
Despite the sharp rhetoric of the past year, both governments arrive at the meeting with limited but overlapping objectives. For the Trump administration, the priority is securing Colombian cooperation on narcotics interdiction and preventing further spillover from Venezuela, particularly along the porous border where armed groups and trafficking networks operate with relative impunity.
“There was a hard lesson from Iraq,” Whitaker said. “Venezuela is a dictatorship with a massive security apparatus. Collapsing it outright could create chaos and another massive migration wave. The calculation became: we can’t afford for this regime to collapse.”
“Objectively, Colombia is very important to the United States,” Reyes said. “We produce the largest amount of cocaine in the world, we have vast maritime jurisdictions, and we share the border with Venezuela. Any strategy that ignores Colombia simply won’t work.”
In Bogotá, the calculation is equally stark. An uncontrolled implosion in Venezuela would likely push hundreds of thousands more migrants into Colombia, empower criminal groups operating along the frontier and deal a serious blow to the prospects of the Colombian left ahead of the 2026 election.
...
That reality has pushed both countries toward a pragmatic, transactional approach, Sánchez-Garzoli said—one that requires Colombian cooperation regardless of who occupies the Casa de Nariño.
“It is in the best interest of both countries not to have relations deteriorate further,” she said. “They need each other to effectively address narco-trafficking, illicit economies, transnational crime, and to guarantee that Venezuela does not become further destabilized.”
Beyond security, economic ties remain significant. In 2024, the United States exported roughly $16.8 billion worth of goods to Colombia, while Colombia sent about $14.5 billion in exports to the U.S., its largest trading partner. Energy anchors both sides of the relationship, with refined petroleum products dominating U.S. exports to Colombia and crude oil, coffee and gold among Colombia’s leading shipments to the United States.
“Who knows, maybe the invitation to the Oval Office offers a fresh start—and not an ambush,” Gedan said. “After all, both countries would benefit from finding ways to cooperate again.”
In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. At Newsweek, ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not "both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.
When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations. Help keep the center courageous. Join today.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines