...
By Hannah Parry
Associate News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
A low-budget vigilante thriller directed by Uwe Boll and a $170 million DC superhero blockbuster would not ordinarily compete for the same headlines.
But in recent weeks, Citizen Vigilante has emerged as one of the most talked-about films online, fueled by political controversy, viral social media distribution and provocative comments from its director, while Supergirl has struggled to generate the same level of online conversation despite its blockbuster budget.
For Boll, the explanation is simple.
Read More on Entertainment
"The reason that CITIZEN VIGILANTE turned into a massiv(sic) hit without any advertising budget is very simple: the power of social media," he told Newsweek. "The movie shows an inconvenient truth what all other movies out there don't want to show or try to sugarcoat in their productions. The audience wants real films again - bold and with impact and about reality. The times of SUPERGIRL and all that cr*p are over."
Not everyone in the industry agrees with that assessment.
Film analyst Scott Mendelson told Newsweek that online buzz wasn't the same as a box office hit.
"The internet is not the real world," he said, adding that social media often created a distorted picture of public interest. The only true metric for a movie, he argued, was whether it was a financial success or not.
...
...
Two Very Different Release Strategies
While the films have become linked online, they represent two radically different distribution models.
Citizen Vigilante has relied on a digital-first strategy, becoming available through video-on-demand platforms while also attracting widespread attention after Boll uploaded the film to X following reports it had been blocked in Germany. The release has benefited from algorithmic amplification and ongoing online debate surrounding its themes.
It also got a major boost after it was made available to watch for free for 48 hours by Elon Musk on X, helping to send it to the top spot on the U.S. Amazon chart for movie purchases.
Supergirl, meanwhile, followed the traditional Hollywood playbook: an expensive worldwide theatrical rollout backed by Warner Bros. and DC Studios before an eventual digital release. Like most studio tentpoles, its success depends largely on box office receipts, critical reception and long-term franchise momentum.
Rather than simply comparing two films, the contrast highlights two competing eras of movie distribution: platform virality versus cinema-first releases.
Streaming Charts Don't Tell the Whole Story
Mendelson cautioned against reading too much into Citizen Vigilante's rankings on platforms including YouTube, iTunes and Fandango at Home, noting that digital storefronts do not disclose revenue figures.
He said that without revenue figures, and with viewing statistics which vary in transparency significantly by company, the only metric left is "'Is it trending?'" he said. "Which means nothing."
He pointed to the 2020 David Ayer thriller The Tax Collector, which topped multiple VOD charts during the pandemic despite generating only about $1 to $2 million in opening-weekend digital revenue. "It was trumpeted as number one on the various VOD platforms," Mendelson said. "That film made a whopping $2 million."
Mendelson said Hollywood spent much of the early 2020s convincing itself that streaming and premium video-on-demand could replace theatrical releases as the industry's primary business model.
"Spoiler: that didn't happen," he said.
Instead, studios have increasingly returned to theatrical releases and advertising-supported revenue streams after discovering that online engagement alone does not generate the same financial returns.
At its core, the definition of a successful movie hasn't changed - it still has to make money, he explained.
Without verified sales figures, he said, headlines declaring Citizen Vigilante a runaway success should be viewed cautiously.
"If they come out and say it did $50 million and here's a third-party verification, then by all means," he said. "But unless there's a number, don't believe them."
Why Is Citizen Vigilante Generating So Much Attention?
Much of Citizen Vigilante's visibility has come from controversy rather than conventional marketing.
The film has been criticized for its graphic violence, anti-immigration themes and vigilante premise. It was inspired by a case in Hamburg in 2016, when a group of teens gang-raped a 14-year-old girl, yet received only suspended sentences. Reports suggested the perpetrators were migrants.
Citizen Vigilante was then effectively blocked from commercial distribution in Germany after the country's film ratings board refused to grant it a classification, citing concerns that it could incite violence against migrants. Boll called the move a "deliberate censorship decision."
Boll also made the decision to cast Armie Hammer, whose career took a hit after he was accused of sexual abuse in 2021 and text messages and voice notes leaked detailing his cannibalistic and BDSM fantasies. Hammer was never criminally charged.
“He wasn’t charged with anything, there was no lawsuit. He was just a guy who was famous and f**king around," Boll told Variety. He said he'd specifically hired him because "he’s a great actor, and also because he was canceled and wanted to work."
The director has also actively encouraged comparisons with Supergirl on social media, further fueling online discussion.
Mendelson said controversy itself has become one of the internet's strongest promotional tools.
"It's the controversy that's fueling the conversation," he said.
However, David A. Gross, editor & publisher of FranchiseRe movie industry newsletter, warned that, "Controversy does not always translate into box office success."
While Goss told Newsweek he had not seen the independent release, he said that generally a movie, "has to be well-made and satisfying" to be a hit.
Why Supergirl Faces Different Expectations
Unlike Citizen Vigilante, Supergirl carries the burden of launching another chapter in DC Studios' cinematic universe.
The film entered theaters as one of Warner Bros.' biggest releases of the year, backed by a reported production budget of around $170 million and expectations that it would build on the momentum of the rebooted DC franchise. Instead, discussion surrounding the film has largely centered on whether it has underperformed commercially and what that could mean for the future direction of DC's interconnected universe.
While reviews have generally described the film as solid rather than exceptional, the conversation has increasingly shifted toward box office expectations rather than the film itself.
That has created an unusual dynamic: Citizen Vigilante dominates social media conversation, while Supergirl remains the far larger commercial release.
Is This Superhero Fatigue?
Some observers have interpreted the contrast as evidence that audiences are growing tired of superheroes.
Mendelson disagrees.
"I wouldn't call it fatigue," he said. "It's disinterest."
During the 2010s, he said, Marvel and DC movies enjoyed an inherent advantage simply by belonging to successful franchises. Today, audiences are more selective.
"They have to pass the 'What else have you got for me?' test," he said.
He argued that Marvel weakened its own formula by making Disney+ television series increasingly essential to understanding theatrical releases.
"The TV shows became required homework," he said.
Do Politics Sell Movies?
Boll argues audiences are embracing films that mainstream Hollywood refuses to make, while his film's anti-immigrant themes have seen him embraced by big figures on the right, such as Musk, who has bolstered distribution.
Mendelson is unconvinced.
"No," he said. "Because if politics sold movies, we'd get more political movies."
Instead, he believes Citizen Vigilante demonstrates how controversy and algorithms can amplify discussion without necessarily proving widespread commercial demand.
"This made money for the people that financed it," he said. "That doesn't mean the next actor with more mainstream credibility is going to sign up for the next one."
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Samantha Beech and Gray R. Thomas
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines