Newt Gingrich: Wait, Is That It? This Democratic Debate Should Scare Democrats | Opinion

It took a while for me to understand the nagging feeling I got from the Democratic debate in Iowa last night. I kept grappling with my dissatisfaction and could not find the right words.

Then I saw a USA Today article which captured my response perfectly—and my feeling was reinforced, because it was articulated by a friend with whom I have worked on criminal justice reform, Van Jones.

Before noting that he wanted a Democrat in the White House, Jones told USA Today, "Democrats have to do better than what we saw tonight. There was nothing I saw tonight that would be able to take Donald Trump out."

The article went on to say that Jones, "described the debate as 'drudgery' at a time when Democrats need to inspire voters."

It was that sense of drudgery which had been lurking at the back of my mind—until Van articulated it.

One of the reasons Bernie Sanders remains a major contender is he actually believes what he says. He may be way too far to the Left. His preference for Fidel Castro over John F. Kennedy may be jarring. His commitment to socialism may make him a nightmare for normal Democrats. But Bernie delivers—with enthusiasm and excitement—his formula for a better America through bigger (indeed gigantic) government.

Meantime, former Vice President Joe Biden is rope-a-doping with a purely tactical campaign that lacks strategic message.

Tom Steyer is proof that inside the anti-billionaire party there is plenty of room to buy your way on the stage past senators, governors, and other traditional political leaders. He at least has a coherent message focused on impeaching Trump and treating global warming as a threat.

Presently, Steyer will be joined by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who is both richer and served three terms as mayor of our nation's largest city. Then we will have no minorities and two billionaires on the party of anti-billionaire diversity. You can't make this stuff up.

Pete Buttigieg continues to prove he is taking the Beto O'Rourke campaign route. Buttigieg is charming, smart, clever, and almost totally phony. Of course, this formula enabled O'Rourke to almost win a Texas senate seat and start a short-lived presidential run before he imploded and disappeared.

Elizabeth Warren was the smartest person on stage. And by the way, she knows it, she knows you know it, and she gets a little annoyed that the other candidates don't seem to get it. If this was a race for high school chemistry teacher, she would win it hands down (meaning no disrespect to high school chemistry teachers.)

However, you can tell things aren't working when the big moment was Warren refusing to shake hands with Sanders over a disputed version of a private two-year-old conversation about whether a woman could be elected president.

Jones caught the agony of this experience for Democrats when he said: "I came away feeling worried for the Democratic Party... I felt like tonight was the night they were going to all put the fireworks out there, you're going to see the best of the best, and it just felt like a big bowl of cold oatmeal."

The one candidate who I thought rose above the banality and the predictability was Senator Amy Klobuchar. She has a solid record of winning against Republicans. She has performed fully competent service in the United States Senate. She is a centrist whose record is solid and whose practical knowledge exceeds all the other candidates combined.

Unfortunately for Senator Klobuchar, she has the Minnesotan trait of being understated and avoiding excessive emotion. If pure competence, sincerity, and knowledge were the keys to being president, she would be formidable.

But several parallel Republicans from the 2016 race could tell her that excitement, originality, daring, and sheer energy are qualities that dominate when the public is assessing possible presidents.

Finally, none of this solves the deeper Democratic problem – that Sanders and Warren combined will likely have as many or more votes than Biden. The Democrats are either going to nominate an unelectable hardcore left-winger, or they are going to nominate a moderate candidate who will be forced to accept a wildly left-wing platform (and vice presidential candidate) to avoid utter chaos at the convention in Milwaukee as the hard Left rebels.

Nothing last night even began to solve that problem.

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich is the chairman of Gingrich 360, the host of the Newt's World podcast and author of the New York Times best-sellers Understanding Trump and Trump's America.

To read, watch or listen to more of Newt's commentary, go to Gingrich360.com.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Newt Gingrich: Wait, Is That It? This Democratic Debate Should Scare Democrats | Opinion | Opinion