...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Five years ago today, rioters smashed windows, beat police officers, and flooded the House and Senate chambers, forcing lawmakers to flee the Capitol. The country’s answer, half a decade on, is not a permanent fortress so much as a sprawling—and pricier—protective web that follows members home. The cost now exceeds $1 billion, at a conservative estimate.
The posture has shifted with the risk. Late last year, the House made permanent an allowance letting members hire personal security away from the Capitol—up to $20,000 per month—and raised the Residential Security Program to $20,000 for home hardening, with $350 a month for alarm monitoring. A new mobile duress app—a silent panic button—rolled out at the same time, reflecting where danger now shows up with alarming regularity. The U.S. Capitol Police opened 9,474 threat-assessment cases in 2024 and, according to NBC News, were on track to reach 14,000 in 2025.
Common Knowledge
Across the left, the guiding instinct is to fund protection without turning Congress into a fortress. After the fence went up in 2021, the ACLU warned that making it permanent would convert a "beacon of democracy into a national symbol of fear," urging leaders to keep access open. Democrats have repeatedly introduced "No Fencing" bills to ban a permanent barrier altogether.
Read More on News
They also pressed to widen the protective net. Last summer, after the Minnesota killings of state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband, Hakeem Jeffries and Joe Morelle urged Speaker Mike Johnson to direct the Sergeant at Arms to take "all necessary steps" to protect members nationwide and to substantially increase office budgets so safety wouldn’t impact constituent service.
Some on the right agree on the premise and want to go further on protection. In the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination, House Republicans pitched an $88 million stopgap to harden security for lawmakers, judges and senior officials, a move Johnson framed as forcing "uncomfortable but necessary conversations" about member safety. However, there is also skepticism toward a Capitol fortress. Mitch McConnell argued early that "we’ve overdone it," likening the fortified campus to Kabul and urging a return to normal visibility. Yet many Republicans now back boosted personal protection for members, especially outside the Capitol.
Uncommon Knowledge
Congress has built a three-part system for protecting its people.
First is a larger federal shield. The FY2026 bill funds the U.S. Capitol Police at $852.2 million, expands chamber-administered security by $203.5 million, and carries $30 million in a separate pool so USCP can reimburse state and local departments for protective coverage in districts. Add them together and you reach about $1.09 billion devoted to protecting members, staff, and visitors in 2026.
The House’s guidance last autumn doubled and cemented the off-campus security stipend at $20,000 per month, raised the home-hardening ceiling to $20,000, and added $350 monthly for monitoring—plus the duress app for members. Uptake hasn’t been universal. As of June 2025, only about 60 percent of House members were enrolled in the Residential Security Program, according to a Hill report.
Private dollars now underwrite public safety. On January 1, 2025, an FEC rule took effect clarifying that campaign funds may pay for personal security when the danger stems from a candidate’s or officeholder’s status. By early autumn, campaigns had reported at least $9.9 million in such spending.
Here is the paradox worthy of January 6. The riots still animate debate. The practical answer, however, has already been purchased: a billion-dollar hybrid where the police build protection capacity; the sergeants-at-arms wire homes, push alerts, and cut checks; and local cops cover in exchange for federally funded reimbursements. Add campaigns spending millions more on bodyguards and cameras, and the United States has settled on a sprawling, decentralized system to keep representative government physically viable. It is at least candid about where the danger lives now.
On this anniversary, that may be the most useful way to remember the day: as the moment when the security perimeter for American democracy moved from the Capitol grounds to the country itself, with a price tag to match.
If you’re enjoying Uncommon Knowledge, please share. If you have suggestions for future editions or feedback, email subscriber.feedback@newsweek.com. We want to hear your voice.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines