10
Loading video...
By Jesus Mesa
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Every American adult will receive a check if Republicans maintain control of both chambers of Congress in November's midterm elections, President Donald Trump said Wednesday.
Within hours, some Republicans were breaking with Trump over how the proposal would be funded and whether it was realistic, while others rallied behind it.
At the first Republican midterm convention in Dallas' American Airlines Center, Trump said he would send $5,000 to every adult American citizen if Republicans hold the House and Senate. He framed it as a reward for the economy Republicans have built.
Read More on Politics
"Because of our tremendous economic success," he told the crowd, the payout would go to every adult citizen in the country. Thousands cheered. Fiscal conservatives, watching from home, did not.
GOP Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie broke with Trump over the proposal, calling it an insult and saying he could not “in good conscience accept a penny less than 10K.” He also warned about the inflation that could result from such a large payment.
...
Former Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene also questioned the plan, linking it to a separate proposal from Vice President JD Vance to provide benefits to stay-at-home parents. Greene estimated that the two proposals could cost about $1.6 trillion. She argued that Republicans who had spent the previous week criticizing Democrats over socialism were now proposing a large government payment of their own.
“No matter which party you vote for you get socialism,” Greene wrote.
Justin Amash, a former Republican congressman who left the party, also criticized the proposal and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who applauded Trump’s announcement. Amash called the plan “economically illiterate” and described it as a “trillion-dollar-plus redistribution scheme.”
Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment on Thursday.
Related Story
Trump Asks Voters to Pretend He’s Running—Where His Approval Rating Stands
The View From Capitol Hill
The criticism reflects a long-standing divide within the Republican Party over government spending and Trump's populist economic proposals. Massie and Texas Representative Chip Roy have frequently opposed spending measures they consider too costly, while other Republicans have embraced Trump's focus on direct economic benefits.
The reaction was not limited to social media. Roy, who is retiring at the end of his term, questioned how the government would pay for a proposal that he estimated could cost more than $1 trillion. The estimate is in line with outside analyses putting the cost of a $5,000 payment to every adult citizen at roughly $1.2 trillion to $1.35 trillion.
A Republican operative was more critical, telling Politico's Inside Congress that the proposal appeared to be an attempt to change the political conversation. Some House Republicans leaving the convention also questioned the proposal, according to reporters.
Vance also appeared to narrow Trump's proposal, saying the payments would not necessarily go to wealthy Americans.
“What the president is talking about is fundamentally a dividend for the working American,” Vance said in an interview with Fox News.
Vance also said that tariff revenue could help fund the payments, saying the administration was collecting “an extraordinary amount of revenue” from tariffs.
Trump offered few details about how the payments would work or how they would be financed. He said only that the money would go to adult citizens and would have to be spent in the United States.
Not Everyone Opposed It
Some Republicans focused instead on Trump's broader message about affordability. Florida Senator Rick Scott made that case before the speech, arguing that Republicans should focus on the cost of housing, food, healthcare and childcare.
Texas Senator Ted Cruz took a more cautious approach. He said he would prefer to tie the payments to work requirements, according to Politico, while acknowledging that the proposal needed more details. Cruz estimated the cost at about $1.3 trillion and called that a significant amount while arguing it was less than what Democrats would spend if they returned to power.
Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno, meanwhile, embraced the proposal and said he would prepare legislation to put the payments into law after the November 3 election.
“I will get a bill ready so that we can get the Trump Dividend passed immediately after the November 3rd election,” Moreno wrote on X. “Because Republicans [and America] will win!”
What the House Race Looks Like
Trump's proposed dividend comes as Republicans try to defend their narrow House majority in the midterms.
The national political environment currently favors Democrats on the generic congressional ballot, a measure used to gauge voters' preferences for Congress. The RealClearPolitics average has Democrats ahead by about 6 percentage points, although the national margin does not directly translate to House seats because of the way congressional districts are drawn.
Recent surveys have shown a similar pattern. A Pew Research Center poll in July found Democrats leading Republicans 43 percent to 37 percent among registered voters on the generic ballot.
Democrats need a net gain of three seats to take the House, according to recent election analyses. All 435 House seats are up for election in November. Republicans, meanwhile, are defending seats in a number of competitive districts while pointing to the economy, immigration and government spending as central issues in the campaign.
The dividend proposal is also unlikely to be a decisive issue for every voter. A Tennessee delegate at the Republican convention told Newsweek that he did not expect the checks to change many people's votes.
“I think people already know which way they're going to vote,” the delegate said. “I don't think it would convince people who are not Republican to vote Republican.”
What the Senate Race Looks Like
The Senate presents a different challenge. Democrats need to gain four seats to take control, and several Republican-held seats are among the most closely watched races of the cycle.
The Cook Political Report currently lists six Senate races as toss-ups: Alaska, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Ohio and Texas. Three races for Democratic-held seats—Georgia, New Hampshire and North Carolina—are rated Lean Democratic.
The map leaves Democrats with several paths to a majority, but they would need to win multiple competitive races, including some in states Trump won in 2024. Recent polling has shown close contests in several of those states, making the Senate battle less dependent on the national vote than the House race.
The Cook Political Report has also shifted several Senate races toward Democrats in recent months, including Iowa and Texas, which are now rated Toss-Ups.
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Jason Lemon and Dave Siminoff.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines