...
By Melissa Fleur Afshar
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
A viral post arguing that Rachel Green, not Ross Geller, was the most emotionally mature character on 90s sitcom Friends has reignited long-running debate about the series' central romance, drawing thousands of reactions from viewers reassessing the show through a modern lens.
Shared on March 11 by @tneql, the Threads post features an image of Jennifer Aniston in character as Green alongside the caption: "Maturity is coming to the realization that Rachel Green was actually the most well-adjusted, good matured, decent person in Friends. And that Ross’s behavior should never be normalized."
The post has been liked more than 13,000 times and sparked over 1,000 comments on Threads, underscoring how enduring—and divisive—the Ross-and-Rachel discourse remains.
Read More on On the Internet
The post builds on years of online debate, particularly since the 2000s, that has increasingly reframed Rachel in a more-sympathetic light while subjecting Ross (David Schwimmer) to sharper criticism. Once positioned as the show’s intellectual and romantic lead, Ross has increasingly been scrutinized by viewers for jealousy, controlling behavior and emotional volatility, especially in contrast to Rachel’s personal and professional growth over the series’ 10-season run.
Several commenters echoed the post’s core argument by contrasting the characters’ trajectories.
...
One wrote: "It's funny cause her and Ross have the opposite character arcs. Rachel starts spoiled and oblivious and grows through the series into a successful, good person. Ross starts pretty down to earth (maybe a few standard 90s male issues). He even goes to his ex-wife’s wedding. Then he just kind of goes insane."
Others argued that Ross actively hindered Rachel’s progress in several storylines.
"Every time she was getting her life together (she did have work to do but it was normal and age appropriate) he’d come along and sabotage what she was doing," one viewer commented.
Another added: "Maturing is realizing Rachel had some of THE biggest character growth in the series, she stuck to her boundaries, she worked hard to develop her career, she dressed impeccably and she didn’t play with Ross’s trash. Ross was easily, EASILY the worst friend, terrible."
The debate also expanded beyond the couple itself to a broader critique of the ensemble.
One commenter wrote: "Absolute real maturity is realizing that despite being called Friends, every single one of them sucked at being friends. None of their behavior should be normalized."
Another revived an old fan-favorite alternative pairing, writing: "Unpopular opinion: Rachel and Joey deserved a chance."
Not all viewers agreed with the reassessment. Some pushed back strongly against the idea that Rachel was the group’s most well-adjusted character, instead championing others.
"Rachel was awful. Chandler (Matthew Perry) clearly became the most well-adjusted after he overcame his commitment issues," one commenter argued.
Another wrote: "She was the most selfish character, what are you talking about? The only time I remember she did anything for anyone but herself was on Monica’s (Courteney Cox) wedding day."
Others nominated Joey Tribbiani (Matt LeBlanc) as the show’s emotional anchor, with one saying: "I disagree. Joey is by far the most stable one on that show."
The renewed debate highlights how Friends continues to evolve in the cultural imagination decades after it first aired, cementing itself as an iconic piece of U.S. television. As viewers revisit the series, many are applying contemporary standards to characters once treated as harmlessly flawed, prompting fresh arguments about growth, accountability and what television once normalized as romantic behavior.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines