Poland Elects Anti-Putin Government

10_27_Poland_01
The leader of Poland's main opposition party, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, kisses the hand of prime minister candidate Beata Szydlo after the exit poll results are announced in Warsaw on Sunday. Pawel Kopczynski/Reuters

This article first appeared on the Carnegie Europe site.

When Poland’s right-wing Law and Justice party lost the country’s parliamentary election in 2011, its conservative and nationalist leader, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, vowed to bring the party back to power.

Not only that. “One day, we will have a Budapest in Warsaw,” he promised, referring to how Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán used his twice-won two-thirds majority to make sweeping constitutional changes.

The good news is that in Poland’s election on October 25, Law and Justice won over 39 percent of the vote but failed to secure two-thirds of the parliamentary seats. This means that the party will not be able to change laws as easily as Orbán’s Fidesz party has been able to do, because Poland, like Hungary, requires a two-thirds parliamentary majority for constitutional changes.

The less good news is that Law and Justice can govern without the need for coalition partners—for the first time in post-Communist Poland. This means that Poland’s new government will not be dogged by the instability that forced it prematurely out of office in 2007.

That stability could allow Beata Szydlo, Poland’s new prime minister designate, to fundamentally shift Poland’s foreign and security policy from the outward-looking and ambitious one that the center-right Civic Platform had pursued to a more inward-looking one more focused on the immediate region. This will affect Warsaw’s relations with the EU and NATO.

Supporters of Law and Justice are conservative, nationalist and Euroskeptic. They resent what they see as diktats issued by Brussels, and they will certainly oppose EU plans to accept more refugees that are arriving in Europe. Kaczynski has already said that refugees and migrants coming to Europe caused “epidemics.”

Yet Law and Justice has to admit that Poland has done very well out of the EU. Civic Platform had put energy security as well as an energy union—two big priorities for Warsaw—high on the EU’s agenda. Poland has had repeated run-ins with Brussels over carbon emission levels and the subsidies that Warsaw provides to the Polish coal industry. In short, Civil Platform cannot be accused of kowtowing to Brussels.

It’s the Euroskepticism of Law and Justice that is bad news for the EU. Another Euroskeptic government has the potential to further weaken the union’s ability to project a united, liberal voice.

This can be only good news for Russian President Vladimir Putin, who can look with satisfaction at the rise of Euroskeptic parties that challenge what the EU stands for. A strong and coherent Europe is not in Putin’s interests.

However, it would be surprising if Law and Justice wavered over the EU sanctions on Russia. Apart from being Euroskeptic, Kaczynski is also very anti-Russian, unlike his Hungarian counterpart and the Czech president. He has never stopped believing that his twin brother and former Polish president, Lech, was assassinated by Russia when his presidential plane crashed in Smolensk, western Russia, in April 2010.

Furthermore, Law and Justice was critical of how Civil Platform had begun a dialogue with Russia aimed at working toward a reconciliation with one of Poland’s archenemies. That dialogue suffered after Russia’s annexation of Crimea in March 2014, but those diplomats and experts who started this immensely difficult task managed to continue it against all the odds. There is little doubt that this dialogue could be a casualty of Law and Justice’s foreign policy.

Another casualty could be Poland’s relationship with its neighbor Germany. The political, trade and social ties had blossomed under Civil Platform. Kaczynski, however, has never hidden his dislike of Germany. His supporters told Carnegie Europe that Civic Platform was too beholden to Berlin, that Poland did everything that German Chancellor Angela Merkel told them to do.

And when Germany opposed NATO establishing a permanent base in Poland because Berlin didn’t want to provoke Russia (regardless of what Russia has been doing in Ukraine), Law and Justice blasted that decision.

It’s a decision that Law and Justice is sure to bring up in NATO and make into an issue when Warsaw hosts the next NATO summit in 2016—if it is not resolved before then. One thing is certain: It will be hard to see Szydlo, with Kaczynski in the background, taking no for an answer from NATO as this duo steers Poland to a not entirely predictable future.

Judy Dempsey is a nonresident senior associate at Carnegie Europe and editor-in-chief of Strategic Europe. Follow her on Twitter @Judy_Dempsey.

Editor's Pick
GettyImages-1062014292

What Is Caravan Paranoia?

"These keyboard commandos, these Walmart warriors, they go down to Cabela’s and buy all these s****y looking goods—stuff to make ‘em look good in the mirror," Robert Crooks, who leads militia group the Mountain Minutemen, said.