...
By David Averre
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
For nearly two decades, the MQ-9 Reaper has been one of the U.S. military's most feared drones.
The high-flying, high-budget unmanned aerial system (UAS) has formed the backbone of America’s intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) efforts over adversarial skies since 2007, gliding 13,000 feet higher than a passenger jet for more than a day at a time to gather unparalleled battlefield data come rain or shine.
It’s also a vicious bird of prey, carrying a loadout of hellfire missiles and laser-guided bombs to deliver pinpoint strikes at a moment’s notice-as the ghost of Iranian Quds Force General Qasem Soleimani can attest.
Read More on Analysis
But today, the U.S. military is not engaging insurgents in the mountains of Afghanistan or jihadists in Iraq’s al-Anbar desert. The year is 2026, and just a few months of war with Iran have seen the once-seemingly invincible machine blasted out of the sky with shocking frequency.
Some 45 Reaper drones—roughly a quarter of the U.S. fleet—have been downed or crashed since the Trump administration launched Operation Epic Fury in February, according to a Washington Post report citing three U.S. officials.
Those figures suggest the rate at which Reapers are going down has continued apace since May, when a Congressional Research Service report listed 24 Reapers among 42 U.S. aircraft lost or damaged in operations over Iran.
How The Reaper’s USP Became Its Kryptonite
The Reaper’s destructive capability earned it both praise and infamy.
When it entered service in the late 2000s, suddenly American commanders found they could deliver pinpoint strikes on high-value targets without risking American lives, or more expensive aerial assets. Unfortunately, many civilians and traumatized drone operators learned the strikes were not as precise as one would like to believe.
But the Reaper’s real value lay in its ability to loiter.
...
Thanks to its 66-foot wingspan and efficient turboprop engine, a modern Reaper can linger at a maximum altitude of 50,000 feet for roughly 24 hours, observing the battlespace and enemy targets with electro-optical cameras, infrared sensors and synthetic aperture radar, before returning to base. Cruising at a relatively low speed of 170-200 miles per hour (150-170 knots), an extended-range Reaper can go for 34 hours before needing a pit stop.
These capabilities assured its status as the undisputed king of medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) unmanned military aircraft. Now, those very same capabilities constitute a serious vulnerability.
“The Reaper was exceptionally effective in the permissive environments of Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere during the 2000s and 2010s, but operating against a state with modern air defenses, particularly when those air defenses have proliferated so widely, is a very different proposition,” Arun Dawson, air power expert and researcher at King’s College London’s Freeman Air and Space Institute, told Newsweek.
“It’s large, relatively slow and nonstealthy, and was designed during an era in which the United States could generally assume air superiority. Those characteristics make it vulnerable against a capable modern air-defense network.”
Related Story
Is Pete Hegseth Checking the USS Abraham Lincoln’s Testosterone?
Jack Of All Trades
The startling number of Reaper losses in the past few months highlights how a shift in an adversary’s capabilities can quickly erase years of dominance. Sure, the MQ-9 can operate without a hitch when tasked with surveilling or striking targets armed with artillery and rocket-propelled grenades 50,000 feet below, but when the adversary presides over a distributed network of air defenses, it can’t spread its wings without impunity.
Another startling number is the Reaper’s price tag: modern unit costs between $30 million and $50 million to produce, before operational costs are even factored in. Here, the Reaper is merely one expression of a bigger trend exposed by war with Iran.
“A Reaper represents an investment of tens of millions of dollars, while modern warfare increasingly offers commanders much cheaper and more expendable unmanned alternatives. The depletion of America’s Patriot air defense missiles and THAAD interceptor stockpiles points to the same underlying challenge: the Western way of war relies on sophisticated and expensive capabilities that cannot currently be replaced at anything approaching the rate at which they can be consumed in a high-intensity conflict,” Dawson said.
“Either those industrial bottlenecks need to be addressed and production expanded substantially, or Western militaries will need to develop different, more sustainable ways and capabilities of war-fighting.”
That change is already underway. President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14307 issued last year directed the Pentagon to procure, integrate and train with low-cost, high-performing drones made in the United States. The result is the Drone Dominance program, a $1 billion DoD initiative designed to source, manufacture and equip U.S. military units with hundreds of thousands of cheap drones by 2027.
...
The Pentagon has even taken inspiration directly from Iran with the Low-cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System (LUCAS)—a one-way attack drone modeled on Tehran’s famed Shahed 136 platform that costs less than $50,000 and can deliver strikes over some 500 miles.
But even now, despite its vulnerabilities after 19 years of service, the Reaper is still one of the most versatile forces in the sky.
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach told members of the House Armed Services Committee at a hearing in May that the Reaper drone had been the “most valuable player” in the Iran war up to that point, adding no other aircraft had come close to carrying out the volume of strikes of the MQ-9.
Dawson explained, “The Reaper remains an extremely capable platform. The MQ-9 combines very long endurance, sophisticated sensors, satellite connectivity and a substantial weapons payload in a single aircraft. There are very few unmanned platforms which can loiter for that length of time, build up an intelligence picture, strike targets if required and then return to base and be used again.
“Where enemy air defenses have been suppressed, where the threat is limited, or where the Reaper can operate at sufficient standoff distance, that combination of range, endurance, payload and persistence remains enormously valuable.”
Sharing The Stage
As other countries like China, Ukraine, Turkey and Iran continue to pioneer cutting-edge drone technology, the Reaper faces mounting competition.
But the platform has proven so capable for so long that, rather than retiring the aircraft, its manufacturer, General Atomics, now produces the MQ-9B—a larger, more powerful, and more advanced iteration that extends loitering time beyond 40 hours, with a reinforced structure and built-in de-icing capabilities to fly further and colder than ever before.
Related Story
Battleship Trump Is Sailing Into Hot Water
Perhaps the future of the Reaper is not obsolescence, but rather reorientation. With a wider variety of drones entering the market, the U.S. military could deploy its Reapers selectively, reserving them for missions better suited to the platform's capabilities while hedging against costly losses.
“Use it where its persistence matters,” Dawson advocated. “Persistent ISR remains its great advantage. There is an enormous difference between briefly observing a target and watching an area continuously for many hours, identifying patterns of activity while still retaining the ability to strike when required.
“Keep it out of the highest-threat environments unless the mission justifies the risk. In heavily defended airspace, cheaper expendable systems or stealthier platforms will often make more sense. Commanders now have many more unmanned options and can match the cost and sophistication of the platform much more closely to the mission.”
He concluded: “The mistake would be either to assume that the Reaper can operate everywhere, as was sometimes possible during the counter-insurgency era, or to conclude from its vulnerability in the most heavily defended environments that it can operate nowhere.
That leaves the Reaper as an expensive specialist: still formidable in the right airspace, but increasingly hard to justify in the wrong one.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines