...
By Suzanne Blake
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
House Republicans are weighing a major shift to Medicaid funding that could transfer significant financial responsibility from the federal government to individual states, putting health care access for millions at risk.
The GOP proposal, part of a broader effort to finance President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic agenda, would impose per capita caps on Medicaid. That structure would limit how much the federal government contributes per enrollee, requiring states to cover any costs above that amount.
Why It Matters
Medicaid, the nation's largest public health program, covers more than 79 million low-income Americans, including many in states that expanded coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
Read More on Politics
The proposed change could reshape how those services are funded and who remains eligible. If the caps are enacted, states could be forced to reduce coverage or increase their own spending to maintain current enrollment levels.
...
What To Know
During a closed-door meeting of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Republicans outlined a proposal that would cap federal Medicaid spending for expansion states while creating a "rainy day fund" to absorb some of the potential shocks.
"We are discussing that," Republican Representative Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, who chairs the committee, told Politico. "That was something that did come up last night."
These discussions arrive as the GOP attempts to cut at least $2 trillion in spending to offset tax breaks and other priorities. Medicaid, which costs federal and state governments over $800 billion annually, is a prime target.
However, Republican Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska has drawn a red line, stating he will not back a plan that includes more than $500 billion in Medicaid cuts.
Currently, 41 states and Washington, D.C., have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. This expansion has brought insurance to 21 million Americans and played a significant role in reducing the national uninsured rate to its lowest levels.
However, a rollback of federal support could trigger state-level "clawback" laws, which automatically cut Medicaid enrollment if federal aid decreases.
While "per capita caps" are seen by some Republicans as less disruptive than cutting federal matching rates outright, health experts warn the result could still be devastating.
Meanwhile, state officials worry that they could be left holding the bag.
What People Are Saying
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Capping federal payments to certain individuals in states with expanded Medicaid is a hard party-line issue at the moment because it could lead to significant coverage losses. It may face some headwinds from many Republicans."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "This has become a more complicated issue than some Republicans thought it would be, as many 'red states' account for millions of Americans who receive benefits from Medicaid. Some of these same states have trigger laws that would go off if Medicaid funding from the federal government went below a certain amount, meaning funding would entirely collapse in those locations.
"As a result, we're starting to see Republicans from some states take a hard-line approach to these cuts, partly out of fear for the disruption to the program that could occur in their states and partly out of fear these decisions could come back to haunt them in future elections."
What Happens Next
House Republicans are aiming to finalize their legislative package in the coming weeks, but internal disagreements could delay action.
"What can pass the Senate?" Republican California Representative David Valadao asked Politico. "It's a dangerous situation."
If Congress moves these funding requirements back to the states, low-income Americans and the disabled will especially suffer, Thompson said.
"I would not put anything past this administration as they continue to eye funding for its tax cuts. It will be up to the legislative body to decide if this is something they want to pass moving forward, and the Republicans have the House and the Senate," he said.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines