Scapegoating Muslims Is Playing Into the Hands of ISIS

Counterdemonstrators yell across to people attending a "Freedom of Speech Rally Round II" in front of the Islamic Community Center in Phoenix on May 29. Using Muslims as scapegoats for the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) through hateful rhetoric and discriminatory policies threatens the safety of Muslims in the United States, the author writes. Nancy Wiechec/Reuters

This article first appeared on the Center for American Progress site.

The incredible barbarism perpetrated by the Islamic State militant group, or ISIS, too often dissuades those in the West from any meaningful assessment of the group's strategy and tactics.

From beheading or burning alive captives to slaughtering entire minority populations and gunning down innocent civilians in previously quiet streets, the violence is incomprehensible and thus can appear devoid of reason or planning.

That is far from the truth. ISIS has been very clear about its objectives. It uses violence to achieve its goals, including to spread fear and induce governments and publics to make choices they otherwise would not; to mobilize its supporters with demonstrations of its capabilities; and, most important, to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash to help it attract new followers and prepare for a clash of civilizations.

Related: To Defeat ISIS, Know Thy Terrorist

The ignorance of most in Western society to ISIS's clear and openly described objectives is providing the necessary fuel for the group's continued growth and momentum. The reaction in the United States to the attacks in Paris has been a mixture of solidarity with the victims and a growing anxiety about the threat ISIS poses to the American homeland.

This fear is understandable, even though the ability of the U.S. government to detect and prevent such attacks has never been stronger. The United States should not be complacent, however, and the Center for American Progress (CAP) has proposed a series of steps the United States should take to defeat ISIS.

We can never completely eliminate the risk of attacks. But in times such as these, it is incumbent upon political leaders to reassure the American people that they are taking all of the appropriate steps to keep them safe now and in the long term.

What is not acceptable is the kind of rhetoric that attempts to exploit Americans' reasonable fears for political gain and tries to push a jittery population toward increased hatred and prejudice: This is Islamophobia. Hateful rhetoric and discriminatory policies that target Muslims are morally wrong, factually inaccurate and genuinely threaten the safety of Muslims in the United States.

The report "Anti-Muslim Sentiment Is a Serious Threat to American Security" focuses on an additional aspect of Islamophobia that receives too little attention in the current political discourse—that ISIS wants and needs the United States and other Western societies to alienate their Muslim populations through their words and deeds. This is a stated goal of ISIS leadership.

ISIS needs the West to alienate and marginalize its Muslim citizens in order to foster the appearance of a war against Islam. ISIS desperately needs new recruits in order to contend with its massive weakness compared with the forces aligned against the group and its incredible unpopularity among Muslims in Muslim-majority countries.

ISIS has developed a very sophisticated propaganda and recruiting campaign that uses modern communications and social-media tools to dramatically eclipse previous recruiting efforts.

Western anti-Muslim sentiment is the central narrative element in this propaganda and recruiting campaign. The many knee-jerk policy proposals directed at all Muslims that are now emerging, particularly among conservatives and from several presidential candidates, serve only to advance ISIS's goals.

This is dangerous and deadly serious. And it must stop.

Should the United States fail to snap out of this spasm of anti-Muslim sentiment that has followed in the wake of the Paris attacks, then the level of alienation that is currently more prevalent in Europe could become common here. This would provide ISIS with additional fuel to prolong this war and increase the loss of innocent lives.

If, however, the United States and other Western societies view our fellow citizens who happen to be Muslim as our strongest asset and partners in defeating the objectives of ISIS, and if we make common cause with the overwhelming majority of Muslims who want to destroy ISIS, then this will be a shorter conflict with far fewer lives lost.

We cannot account for the utter barbarism of ISIS. But we are in complete control of how we react to it.

Ken Gude is a senior fellow with the national security and international policy team at the Center for American Progress.