...
By Hollie Silverman
News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
President Donald Trump thanks Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district on Wednesday.
The decision in Louisiana v. Callais could allow Republican-led states to roll back districts designed to boost representation for Black and Latino voters, and Democratic leaders are warning of the possible consequences.
The case centers on how race can be used in drawing political maps. The justices concluded that Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black district went too far in relying on race, raising constitutional concerns under the Equal Protection Clause.
Read More on Politics
"Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in the Callais case is a BIG WIN for Equal Protection under the Law, as it returns the Voting Rights Act to its Original Intent, which was to protect against intentional Racial Discrimination," Trump said in a post on Truth Social Wednesday night, adding, "Thank you to brilliant Justice Samuel Alito for authoring this important and appropriate Opinion. Congratulations!"
Earlier in the day, Former President Barack Obama called on Democrats to mobilize after the decision, saying it "effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of 'partisanship' rather than explicit 'racial bias.'"
"And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach," Obama continued.
Why It Matters
The Supreme Court’s decision signals a shift in how the court may approach the balance between the Voting Rights Act and constitutional limits on race-based decision-making. Critics warn the ruling could weaken protections for minority voters, while supporters say it reinforces limits on the use of race in government decisions.
The outcome could have nationwide consequences, potentially affecting how states draw congressional districts and influencing the balance of power in Congress by making it easier to dismantle districts that have tended to favor Democratic candidates.
In light of the recent decision, Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee said on X that she wanted the legislature to reconvene in order to create another Republican seat in Memphis. "It's essential to cement @realDonaldTrump’s agenda and the Golden Age of America. I've vowed to keep Tennessee a red state, and as Governor, I'll do everything I can to make this map a reality."
What Is Louisiana v. Callais?
The case involves a challenge to Louisiana’s most recent congressional map. After earlier litigation found that the state’s previous districts likely violated the Voting Rights Act by limiting Black voters’ influence, lawmakers approved a revised map that created a second majority-Black district.
A group of challengers argued that the new map was unconstitutional because it prioritized race in drawing district lines. The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court to determine whether Louisiana’s attempt to comply with federal voting protections crossed constitutional limits.
One of the Voting Rights Act's most important provisions, known as Section 2, bans voting practices, including district maps, that dilute the voting power of minority groups. For decades, the law has been used to challenge redistricting plans and to require states to create districts in which minority voters have a fair opportunity to elect representatives.
“Today’s decision is a devastating blow to what remains of the Voting Rights Act, and a license for corrupt politicians who want to rig the system by silencing entire communities. The Supreme Court betrayed Black voters, they betrayed America, and they betrayed our democracy," NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement shared with Newsweek.
...
How Did the Supreme Court Rule?
The justices ruled 6-3 that Louisiana’s second majority-Black district was unconstitutional because race was the dominant factor in its design. The court said that while the Voting Rights Act allows consideration of race in some circumstances, it does not permit states to make it the overriding factor without sufficient justification.
Alito said in the decision, "Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 52 U. S. C. §10301 et seq., was designed to enforce the Constitution—not collide with it. Unfortunately, lower courts have sometimes applied this Court’s §2 precedents in a way that forces States to engage in the very race-based discrimination that the Constitution forbids."
Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by fellow liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
The decision narrows the scope of how states can balance federal voting protections with constitutional limits on race-based decision-making.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, characterized the decision as "devastating," saying in a post on X, "The consequences will be felt across the country: fewer voices heard, fewer communities represented and a democracy diminished. Congress must urgently pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to restore the full strength of the Voting Rights Act before this latest blow becomes fatal."
Those sentiments were echoed by other Democrats, with Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin calling it "a dark day for America."
“Today is a devastating day for democracy and a wake-up call for all those who seek to protect it," Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee President Heather Williams said in a statement shared with Newsweek. "With key parts of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act weakened, Republicans are now more empowered to drag our democracy backward, silence communities of color, and rig maps to protect their own power. State legislatures play a role in drawing over 300 congressional districts, and we must charge into the 2026 elections clear-eyed about the urgency and stakes of the once-in-a-generation opportunity to build Democratic power in the states."
“This is an all-hands-on-deck moment: Democrats must build more durable state legislative majorities and break out of superminorities so Democratic governors can fight against GOP gerrymanders," Williams continued, "The DLCC has the national strategy to counter the worst effects of this court ruling from becoming a reality – we don’t have a moment to lose.”
What Happens Next
The ruling sends Louisiana’s map back to the lower courts and could prompt the state to redraw its districts again. More broadly, the decision is expected to influence ongoing and future redistricting battles across the country.
Legal challenges in other states may now rely on this ruling to contest majority-minority districts, while advocates for voting rights are likely to pursue new strategies to protect minority representation under the law.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines