John Roberts, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, speaks during lecture to the Georgetown Law School graduating class of 2025, in Washington, Monday, May 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

...

Gabe Whisnant

By Gabe Whisnant

News Editor

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.


Chief Justice John Roberts recused himself from two decisions as the Supreme Court issued its January 12 order list Monday, which included certiorari grants, denials and procedural rulings.

Roberts did not participate in Alaska v. United States, a dispute over state and federal authority involving land and resource rights, and in Bochra v. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which concerned a rehearing petition tied to a lower court proceeding. The Court did not explain the recusals, which typically occur when a justice has prior involvement in a case.

John Roberts, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, speaks during lecture to the Georgetown Law School graduating class of 2025, in Washington, Monday, May 12, 2025. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

...

Read More on News

Why It Matters

Roberts rarely recuses himself, so sitting out two decisions signals potential conflicts or concerns about impartiality. His absence could influence outcomes on closely divided cases

What To Know

The Supreme Court declined to review Lujan Claimants v. Boy Scouts of America, leaving intact a $2.4 billion bankruptcy settlement that shields local councils and third-party groups from future lawsuits by childhood sex-abuse victims. The decision rejects an appeal from 75 claimants who argued the deal unlawfully blocked suits against organizations that supported scouting programs, citing last year’s Purdue Pharma ruling.

The Boy Scouts filed for bankruptcy in 2020 after hundreds of abuse lawsuits, and a Delaware court approved the reorganization plan in 2022, creating a compensation fund for more than 82,000 victims. Lower courts upheld the settlement, and the Supreme Court offered no explanation for its refusal, which effectively ends the challenge.

In other notable actions, the Court granted certiorari in two related cases — Full Play Group, S.A. v. United States and Lopez v. United States — both stemming from a sprawling FIFA corruption probe. The justices vacated judgments and sent the cases back to the Second Circuit for further review in light of a pending motion to dismiss the indictment, signaling potential shifts in how foreign bribery laws apply to sports executives.

In Zielinski v. United States, the Court granted review and remanded to the Eighth Circuit after the Solicitor General urged reconsideration. That case involves questions about sentencing enhancements and procedural fairness.

The order list also denied dozens of petitions, including high-profile business disputes and criminal appeals, and rejected multiple requests for stays and injunctions. Writs of mandamus and rehearing petitions were turned down across a range of civil and criminal matters. In one maritime case, Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, the Solicitor General was granted time for divided argument, underscoring the government’s interest in litigation tied to Cuba sanctions.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday is hearing arguments in two cases challenging state bans on transgender athletes, weighing whether the restrictions violate the Constitution or Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education.

What Happens Next

The Court’s next scheduled conference is later this month, as justices continue to shape a docket that includes major cases on administrative power, social media regulation and immigration.

Updates: 1/12/26, 2:04 p.m. ET: This article was updated with new information and remarks.

The news cycle is loud. Algorithms push us to extremes. In the middle—where facts, ideas and progress live—there's a void. At Newsweek, we fill it with fearless, fair and fiercely independent journalism.

Common ground isn't just possible—it's essential. Our readers reflect America's diversity, united by a desire for thoughtful, unbiased news. Independent ratings confirm our approach: NewsGuard gives us 100/100 for reliability, and AllSides places us firmly in the political center.

In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. Ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not "both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.

When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy:

Help keep the center courageous. Join today.

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines