Nine tech executives and Silicon Valley politicians have taken sides so far.
Apple's argument that Congress needs new authority to require it to assist the FBI appears to be wrong.
Victims will file a legal brief in support of the U.S. government's attempt to force Apple to unlock the encrypted iPhone belonging to one of the shooters.
Organizers tell 'Newsweek' the battle is "one of the most important fights of our generation."
The Department of Justice calls Apple's fight against opening an encrypted smartphone "a public brand marketing strategy."
If companies are to be forced to unlock encrypted technology, that mandate should come from Congress.
Cook refused to comply with the government's request to unlock an iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.
Adam Schiff expressed willingness to create ground rules for when tech firms should grant the authorities access to their products.
A request to decrypt San Bernardino attacker's iPhone raises profound privacy issues.
What the FBI requested was nothing short of a revolutionary assault on digital privacy and security.
The First Amendment and a less-recognized law from 1789 are the two factors in contention.
The case is part of a long-running dispute between tech companies and law enforcement over encryption.
The ENCRYPT Act of 2016 has bipartisan support in Congress.
It has a myriad of problems and may be unconstitutional.
Apple opposes the U.K. government's proposals to access encrypted communications.
It's important to distinguish ubiquitous encryption and advanced encryption programs.
Does encryption make Americans more or less safe?