Online Censorship

Wrongthinkers must be treated as a danger in Joe Biden's America because Wrongthinkers threaten the power and privilege of the Ruling Class for which he serves as a figurehead.

Who rules in America? Is it a handful of unaccountable elites, who concoct and enforce standards arbitrarily? Or is it the American people?

Common carriage opens the door to for the government employ public accommodation requirements without running afoul of the First Amendment.

But the real reason is far more nefarious.

Dissidents and free thinkers were once lionized in America, but today oppressive conformity is the golden rule for our media class.

Senator Roger Wicker's (R-Miss.) PRO-SPEECH Act, introduced last Thursday, takes a novel approach to one of the most pressing threats to our democracy: Big Tech's control of our political discussion.

Zuckerberg was slow to react to the enormous pressure from much of the chattering class to ban accounts of figures and groups it deemed spreaders of "disinformation."

Florida is right to stand up to Big Tech companies in order to protect their political candidates and safeguard their elections.

Conservatives need bold leaders who care about effectiveness, instead of just whining into the void.

Ironically, the Ruling Class's claim to power would be stronger if it ceased its hostility toward the roughly half of the country it deems Deplorable.

Thursday's hearing provided five key points that can help chart a path forward for those hoping to hold big tech accountable.

In a democracy with an open marketplace of ideas, the right to hear is more fundamental than any purported right to cancel.

The supplies needed to partake in democracy, be involved in community, engage in commerce and support a family are controlled by several powerful corporations bent on denying service to—in essence, exiling—half of the country.

The Left often outsources deplatforming to private corporations. It happens all the time.

Mr. President, the election has emboldened your liberal and progressive allies to target for ostracism and punishment a new band of "deplorables": your fellow Catholics.

Today's cancel culture, just as with the totalitarian regime in the country of my birth, ruthlessly doles out disproportionate retribution for the crime of dissent.

Through a combination of surveillance, speech policing and economic censorship, private companies are undermining the virtues of a free and open internet and relegating many Americans to second-class status.

Illicit online content continues to proliferate and has become increasingly violent and harmful to our nation's youth.

It is time for democratic governments to protect their citizens and restore a free internet.

Conservatives should create alternative communications systems to provide access for everyone who disagrees with the Left.

America increasingly seems to be on a path to self-destruction.

The power of these companies to control public discourse is a clear and present danger to everyone who values free speech.

This is not a theoretical debate in free speech, but rather a demand for an equal standard for those who use Twitter to incite violence.

The media will predictably declare the world safe again on January 20.

The ultimate outcome of the fight for internet freedom is hardly a foregone conclusion.

Democrats would be wise to ensure Trump does not attain sainthood status.

Big Tech is the ruling class's means by which to control the acceptability, or lack thereof, of speech itself.

The most important question to be asked about the next four years is whether Big Tech will not only have a loud voice in Washington, but also ensure that its power continues to grow.

The media's day of reckoning is coming. This election will serve as the tipping point when media outlets finally give way to a new frontier. The Wild West of new media is upon us.

Will Chamberlain of the Internet Accountability Project debates Matthew Feeney of the Cato Institute.