Pro-life

Democrats in Congress have opened the door to begin funding overseas abortion for the first time in half a century.

To protect the rule of law, the Court can do nothing better than to overturn Roe and return the abortion issue to the states, where public policy and public opinion can be better aligned.

For the first time in 40 years, the House Labor and Health and Human Services Subcommittee approved a spending bill that doesn't include the Hyde Amendment.

The medical community's safety concerns end when it comes to pills that cause abortion.

The problem with the Women's Health Protection Act, however, is that women's health is the last thing it has in mind.

The administration's support of mail-order abortion reflects a commitment to political priorities, not the safety and well being of women.

While a pro-life outcome in Dobbs v. Jackson is not guaranteed, the pro-life movement has nothing to lose and everything to gain.

The Dobbs Court can overturn Roe's viability standard based on the fact that recent scientific and legal developments show that each successful abortion kills a human.

In a country with the thinnest safety net in the developed world, subsidizing abortion rather than spending money to support families reflects a gross misplacement of priorities.

A nominally conservative Court is set to decide the fate of the legal conservative movement itself.

It is long past time for the Supreme Court to right the grievous wrong of Roe v. Wade.

Aspiring parents need a robust life-respecting culture that supports mothers, encourages fathers and inspires young couples to raise families.

In deciding Dobbs, the Court could go in at least one of three directions.

No human being should be considered disposable, brought into existence as a science experiment and then destroyed.

Some are now asking whether our approach to constitutional law is worth keeping, if it fails to protect life and families. Why not ask the same of our economic and health care systems?

Planned Parenthood staff repeatedly spread misinformation and dehumanized preborn children to encourage would-be clients to have an abortion.

Instead of protecting and defending life, President Biden's actions during his administration's first 100 days have attacked the unborn.

Ohio declared the equal status of special needs children, and the ethical wrong of targeting them, as a public statute of the people.

The abortion movement has every reason to fear the democratic process. From the start, it's run to the courts to impose an agenda so unpopular it could scarcely be achieved at the ballot box.

Biden's nominee to head the Department of Health and Human Services has faced criticism for his lack of experience, support for Medicare for All and abortion-rights stance.

While the Biden administration attempts to enforce its agenda at the federal level, the pro-life movement will be fighting back in the states to advance protections for preborn children and their mothers.

Touting Biden's Catholicism was about rendering this policy less radioactive rather than making a principled case for it.

We must lock arms as we work toward protecting the inherent dignity of every human person. The unborn person is no exception and deserves equal protection under the law.

As millions of Americans are hurting because of the coronavirus, Biden appears hell-bent on cancelling an extraordinarily effective and life-giving policy.

On Christmas Day, Christians celebrate Jesus entering this world. It's incredible when you think about it.

Among the signees in the letter were people who have criticized Warnock for his views on abortion.

The viral video shows the escort calling out the protester for trying to shame patients by calling them cowards. The escort tells them to "shut the f**k up."

The Susan B. Anthony List has given an "A" rating to both of Georgia's anti-abortion senators.

"There's a place for you in America if you are pro-life, if you embrace your religion, and you follow traditional family structure," the Republican senator from South Carolina said.

Barrett's hearings could take an important first step toward withdrawing the Court from the political battlefield that it has entered.