Pro-life

We look forward to the day abortion is a distant memory of a late-capitalist past when profit mattered more than human lives.

A pending power shift away from the judicial branch to the executive and legislative branches will result in key changes for abortion policy and activism.

In a post-Roe America, each state will resume a debate that was unjustly stifled for two generations concerning how we protect the most vulnerable.

Roe and Casey concern an issue over which Americans were deeply divided 49 years ago and over which they remain no less divided today.

"Abortion pills forever," chanted four abortion activists outside the Supreme Court in early December during oral arguments for the case Dobbs v. Jackson.

This week's FDA decision legalizes mail-order abortion. This will not "empower" women, as some suggest.

The facts facing the Dobbs Court today are so different that Roe has been robbed of its original justifications.

If they can work across the aisle, progressives may find conservative lawmakers newly willing to pass laws that materially support pregnant women and their children.

During oral arguments, Justice Sotomayor displayed abysmal ignorance of the most basic scientific and medical facts about developing human life.

As a small-town girl from Mississippi, I couldn't have imagined that one day I would sponsor legislation that would find its way up to the Supreme Court.

Women are repeatedly told that they can't have a baby and go to school—that motherhood means they won't reach their full potential. But my story, like so many other women's stories, prove that isn't true.

The state has a profound interest in protecting the integrity of the medical profession. Doing so also protects our patients—both mothers and their unborn children.

Pro-abortion forces are using historical alchemy to attempt to raise the dead pseudo-history that underlay Roe and its progeny.

On December 1, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade's viability standard.

Petitioners complained he's previously supported Planned Parenthood, saying "his beliefs and core values do not align with those" of the school.

The Heartbeat Act is causing quite the stir. The pro-life community embraces it as progress toward protecting unborn lives, abortion rights advocates view it as an affront to Roe v. Wade.

GOP gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin said he wouldn't have signed Texas' abortion ban, but Democrats have warned of anti-abortion policies if he is elected.

Texas' new heartbeat law, SB8, doesn't sit well with the abortion industry. Protecting life in the womb never does.

When a human being begins to exist is an essential and relevant scientific fact that everyone can and should know.

Texas governor Greg Abbott signed into law on Friday new safeguards protecting women from the significant risks of abortion pills sent by mail.

The fact is, the measures in the Democrats' abortion-on-demand legislation are extreme, even for Americans who identify as "pro-choice."

Since the passage of the Texas Heartbeat Act, abortion advocacy groups have shifted into overdrive to discredit not just the law, but those who have worked for its passage.

The Republican said he would not have signed Texas' new abortion law when asked about abortion-related legislation during a Thursday debate.

Except for one, all of the online ads from pro-life group Live Action remain banned by Google, including one about abortion pill reversal.

Some anti-abortion advocates are worried that the new Texas law will cause a "backlash" against the movement.

In the state of Texas, most preborn children are now protected from the horrific violence of abortion.

Mississippi's limit on abortion—which the Supreme Court will consider this fall—is supported by historical legal principles as well as the latest science.

The Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of a Mississippi ban on pre-viability abortions in Dobbs v. Jackson this upcoming term.

Newsom and his pro-abortion allies are asking voters to rally around California's governor-led policy of taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.

Democrats in Congress have opened the door to begin funding overseas abortion for the first time in half a century.