10
Loading video...
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
President Donald Trump's administration is expanding coordination among federal agencies to detect and counter potentially dangerous drones, as recent conflicts demonstrate the growing ability of relatively inexpensive unmanned aircraft to threaten military bases, critical infrastructure and civilian airspace.
The announcement by the Department of Transportation (DOT) on Monday establishes an interagency process for evaluating and deploying technology that can detect, track, disable or take control of unauthorized drones while limiting risks to civilian aviation.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the administration was taking a “proactive, whole-of-government approach to protecting American airspace from emerging 21st century threats.”
Read More on News
“By bringing all our federal partners together, we can strengthen our ability to combat rogue drone threats and keep the flying public safe,” Duffy said.
...
More than 1 million drones were lawfully registered with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as of December 2024, with thousands of commercial, recreational and law-enforcement drones operating across the country on any given day, according to the statement.
Most of the activity is legal. But the proliferation of drones has created a challenge for authorities trying to distinguish routine flights from aircraft operating carelessly, illegally or with malicious intent.
At the same time, the war with Iran has underscored the military threat posed by drones. An Associated Press analysis found that more than 115 drone or missile strikes claimed by Iran or Iranian-backed militias damaged or destroyed structures at 26 military bases and other sites containing U.S. equipment through August.
The administration's domestic initiative does not identify a single new or imminent drone threat. Instead, it is aimed at improving how federal agencies identify suspicious activity and determine when and how counter-drone technology can safely be deployed.
Related Story
The Future of Warfare Belongs to Old Drones With New Tricks
What Is the Threat?
Brandon Archuleta, a former U.S. Army officer and visiting fellow at Pomona College, told Newsweek on Monday that a coordinated federal response is “the smart way to address this national security challenge.”
He pointed to Ukraine’s 2025 Operation Spiderweb attack on Russian airbases as an example of the potential threat, saying that Ukraine covertly moved more than 100 drones into Russia aboard trucks before launching them near their targets.
“Operation Spiderweb is the example par excellence of how catastrophic a drone attack could be on U.S. civil-military infrastructure,” Archuleta said.
He said that defending against a similar attack in the United States would require coordination among the Homeland Security, War and Transportation departments, among other agencies.
Lorenz Meier, founder and CEO of Auterion, said the increase in use of drones in combat have increased concerns.
"Drones have seen civilian use for 15 years," Meier said. "With recent intense utilization in combat in Ukraine, the concerns about unauthorized use have significantly increased. Small drones [off-the-shelf as well as purpose built] have been armed and with that pose a far greater threat than just a few years ago."
The potential threats range from accidental airspace violations to the deliberate use of drones for surveillance, smuggling or attacks.
Unauthorized drones near airports can interfere with crewed aircraft, while those operating near military bases, energy facilities and other critical infrastructure can raise security and surveillance concerns.
Recent warfare has illustrated another dimension of the threat. During this year's war with the U.S. and Israel, Iran has deployed large numbers of one-way attack drones alongside ballistic and cruise missiles against targets across the Middle East.
Iranian strikes initially focused on aircraft hangars and systems used to detect incoming attacks before striking other facilities. The attacks caused billions of dollars in equipment damage and highlighted vulnerabilities in U.S. defenses in the region.
An analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that Shahed-series one-way attack drones played a major role in Iran's retaliation campaign. Their relatively low cost allowed Iran to sustain pressure while forcing defenders to expend air-defense resources intercepting them. The analysis concluded that drones had become “central instruments of modern air campaigns” rather than merely auxiliary weapons.
The conflict also generated concerns about a potential threat to the U.S. homeland.
In March, the FBI circulated an alert containing unverified information that Iran allegedly aspired to launch drones from an unidentified vessel off the U.S. coast against unspecified targets in California if the United States attacked Iran. The bureau said it had no additional information on the timing, method, targets or potential perpetrators.
Governor Gavin Newsom said at the time that California officials were coordinating with security and intelligence agencies but were not aware of an imminent threat.
The warning was not evidence that an Iranian drone attack against the U.S. mainland was imminent or operationally feasible, but the war has provided a real-world demonstration of how inexpensive drones can be used alongside missiles to challenge sophisticated air defenses.
Within the United States, federal authorities are preparing for a broader range of threats, including unauthorized flights around airports and sensitive sites as well as criminal or deliberately weaponized drones.
Attorney General Todd Blanche said the FBI arrested five men accused of planning to use explosive-equipped drones near the Ultimate Fighting Championship Freedom 250 event at the White House in June. The allegation was included in the administration's announcement, which did not provide the defendants' names or supporting case information.
The central challenge is that an unidentified drone is not necessarily a hostile one. An aircraft could belong to a recreational pilot, commercial operator or law-enforcement agency, or it could represent a genuine security threat.
What About the New Jersey Mystery Drones?
Questions about the government's ability to make that distinction attracted national attention in late 2024, when residents in New Jersey and other states in the Northeast reported mysterious objects flying at night.
There were sightings near military installations, prompting residents and lawmakers to press federal authorities for answers. The FBI worked with state and local authorities to investigate the reports, while then-New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy said officials had not identified the source of the reported objects but did not believe they presented a safety threat.
Federal agencies later said the FBI received more than 5,000 tips and generated approximately 100 investigative leads. After examining technical data and reports, officials concluded that the sightings included lawful commercial, recreational and law-enforcement drones, along with planes, helicopters and stars that had been mistaken for drones.
The FAA, FBI, Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense said they had not identified anything anomalous and did not assess the reported activity as presenting a national-security or public-safety risk over New Jersey or other northeastern states.
Officials did, however, acknowledge a limited number of drone sightings over military facilities, including within restricted airspace.
The episode highlighted the broader challenge federal authorities face: rapidly determining whether an unidentified object is an unauthorized drone, a lawful aircraft or something else before deciding whether intervention is necessary.
What Changes Have Been Made?
The new agreement creates a more standardized process across the federal government for researching, testing and deploying counter-drone technologies.
Federal agencies will collaborate on technical requirements, testing and data sharing for systems capable of detecting, tracking, stopping or taking control of potentially dangerous or unauthorized drones. The FAA and Federal Communications Commission will be involved in evaluating systems because counter-drone technologies can themselves create concerns for aircraft, navigation or communications.
The FAA will conduct safety-risk assessments of proposed counter-drone systems and can recommend safeguards designed to prevent the technology from creating new hazards in U.S. airspace.
The agreement builds on previous federal efforts, including a temporary flight restriction along part of the southern border and an FAA safety assessment involving a high-energy laser counter-drone system.
The broader goal is to give authorities the ability to identify and respond to a genuine drone threat without creating another hazard for civilian aircraft.
Does This Impact Recreational Drone Use?
The administration's initiative does not establish a nationwide ban on recreational drones or announce sweeping new restrictions on lawful hobbyist flights.
Recreational pilots remain subject to existing FAA requirements involving registration, altitude, visual line of sight and operations in controlled or restricted airspace.
Federal agencies emphasized the scale of legitimate activity during their response to the New Jersey sightings, noting that more than 1 million drones were lawfully registered with the FAA and that thousands of commercial, hobbyist and law-enforcement drones operate on any given day.
That distinction is central to the administration's effort. The stated target is not ordinary recreational drone use, but unsafe or unauthorized aircraft and drones that could be used for criminal or hostile purposes, particularly around airports, military installations, critical infrastructure and major public events.
Newsweek’s reporters and editors used Martyn, our AI assistant, to produce this story. Learn more about Martyn
here.
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Samantha Beech and Dave Siminoff.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines