Trump Is Dead Wrong About Our NATO Allies

Spanish troops taking part in Exercise Trident Juncture, NATO's largest joint and combined military exercise in more than a decade, at the San Gregorio training grounds outside Zaragoza, Spain, on November 4, 2015. Personnel from more than 35 nations, including all NATO Allies, participated. Trump's notion that America’s NATO allies “do nothing” tramples on the sacrifice that foreign troops made in coming to the defense of the U.S. Paul Hanna/reuters

This article first appeared on the Atlantic Council site.

In an interview with The Washington Post a day before the terrorist attacks in Brussels, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump unveiled an "unabashedly non-interventionist approach" to America's role in the world.

High on his list of targets was NATO. Trump alleged that the United States' "allies do nothing," meaning the United States "can't afford" to fund NATO anymore. But if he wants to sustain the United States' stature as the most powerful nation in the world, he can't afford not to.

Trump's criticisms of NATO unfortunately reflect the views of many in the United States. Why, many wonder, should we continue to bankroll European defense if the Europeans are uninterested in doing it themselves?

Here are three reasons that would appeal to those sharing Trump's views.

First, the United States cannot carry out any military operation in Asia, Europe, Africa or the Middle East without its military bases and infrastructure in Europe. ISIS demonstrated its reach into Europe through the heinous attacks in Brussels on March 22 and the attacks in Paris last November, but the United States remains a primary target.

A new campaign to roll back ISIS, whether through "bombing the shit out of them" or otherwise, would be logistically impossible without the U.S. military's sizeable presence in Europe. The same goes for any other military operations that could occur if Trump were elected president.

Second, it is a far better investment to sustain Europe's peace and stability than divest in it. At a time when Europe is fraying at the seams, from terrorist attacks, external threats and internal political strife, American disengagement from NATO could prove fatal for our vision to create a Europe whole, free and at peace—a vision that Democratic and Republican Presidents have shared for over 70 years.

American security and prosperity is at risk with an unstable Europe. Two world wars that collectively cost over 500,000 American lives prove this.

Third, Europe remains the United States' largest trade partner and a significant growth engine of the American economy, linked to nearly 15 million jobs. U.S.-European trade is the linchpin of the global economy, accounting for half of the world's economic output.

Security begets economic prosperity, and the United States underpins Europe's security through NATO. Ensuring the security and stability of our most important trade partner is, if nothing else, a significant return on investment.

Finally, we should dispel the notion that NATO allies "do nothing." In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, allied countries well beyond Al- Qaeda's attention sent their sons and daughters to fight—and die—alongside American soldiers in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The notion that the United States' NATO allies do nothing tramples on the legacy and sacrifice that Canadian, French, Norwegian, Romanian and other troops made in coming to the defense of the U.S.

The United States did not found NATO as a favor to Europe. The Alliance is the bedrock of American global engagement and the keystone of its global military footprint. It is the manifestation of America's role as a world leader, an assemblage of our staunchest allies and strongest democracies, and a beacon of hope for aspiring members and fledgling democracies. If Donald Trump wants to "make America great again" on a global stage, he cannot do so without NATO.

Robbie Gramer is an associate director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security.