By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The line landed like a barstool threat delivered from a presidential motorcade: "They spit, we hit," President Donald Trump said in June 2025, as he defended deploying National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid anti-ICE protests—and pointedly framed not just police, but soldiers, as fair game for escalation.
A few months later, with Iranian streets convulsing in unrest, Trump switched costumes—from sheriff to self-appointed humanitarian—warning that "if Iran [shoots] and violently kills peaceful protesters" America would "rescue" them, adding that the U.S. was "locked and loaded."
Then, on January 7, an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old Minneapolis woman, during a major federal immigration operation—an incident captured on video.
Read More on Analysis
Footage appears to show the SUV inching forward, reversing briefly, and then turning as if to drive away; the agent fires multiple times, including at least one shot after the vehicle’s bumper has passed him. It’s not clear whether the car makes contact with the officer, who stays on his feet. Trump said Good "violently, willfully, and viciously ran over" an agent, before any investigation had taken place.
The contrast is clear. Trump’s moral vocabulary is not universal; it’s territorial.
Why is this happening?
Good was killed during an immigration-enforcement "surge" tied to Trump’s nationwide crackdown, with protests flaring and competing claims hardening within hours.
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said Good had followed agents, blocked their vehicle, refused orders, then "weaponize[d] her vehicle" and "attempted to run a law enforcement officer over," calling it "domestic terrorism."
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey watched the video and publicly detonated the federal framing. "They’re already trying to spin this as an action of self-defense," he said. "Having seen the video myself…that is bulls***," later telling ICE: "Get the f*** out of Minneapolis."
While the footage complicates the neat "terrorist with a car" story, Trump, unsurprisingly, didn’t narrate the ambiguity. In a social media post, he said the video showed the woman "violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer," who "seems to have shot her in self-defense."
The administration says it is running the "largest DHS operation ever" in Minnesota with 2,000 officers, and Trump has pushed ICE toward an arrest goal of 3,000 migrants a day—numbers that turn any confrontation into an inevitability, not an outlier.
If the Good shooting is the spark, the tinder is Trump’s second-term posture toward domestic dissent: treat it as a public-order problem first and a civil-liberties question never. During the Los Angeles unrest, he called demonstrators "violent, insurrectionist mobs," urged officials to "take all such action necessary" to stop "riots," and egged on the police chief: "Don’t let these thugs get away with this."
Weeks later, after clashes in California, Trump posted that he watched "THUGS" throw rocks and bricks at ICE vehicles and said: "I am giving Total Authorization for ICE to protect itself."
By September 2025, the rhetoric went explicitly martial. Trump described Portland as "war ravaged" and said he was authorizing troop deployments to protect ICE facilities "under siege," promising "full Force, if necessary."
Even the White House has codified this worldview into official language: in a September 2025 "fact sheet," Trump designated Antifa a "MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION" and urged investigations into its funders—blurring protest, activism, and terrorism into one convenient bucket labeled "Radical Left."
Trump’s Iran post casts "peaceful protesters" as people America might "rescue"—a posture of protective outrage aimed safely overseas, at a familiar enemy.
That’s the tell: Abroad, protesters are leverage. At home—especially when they collide with immigration enforcement—they’re often framed as threats to be subdued, arrested, or, if the moment turns fatal, posthumously prosecuted in the court of presidential adjectives.
What is the Right saying?
The administration’s defense is straightforward: officers were attacked; officers responded; end of story. Noem called the latest Minneapolis incident "domestic terrorism" and said Good had "attempted to run a law enforcement officer over," framing the shooting as the consequence of assaulting agents doing their jobs.
Trump’s own language supplies the moral permission slip. In Los Angeles, he threatened escalation and vowed a "very, very strong" law-and-order response if there’s "danger."
And in his "Total Authorization" post about anti-ICE clashes, he demanded the arrest of "SLIMEBALLS" "using whatever means is necessary," explicitly widening the range of acceptable force when federal officers are challenged.
Regarding the footage, supporters of the agent argue that in real time—feet from a moving vehicle—split-second decisions are made under adrenaline and uncertainty, and that a grazing impact can still reasonably be perceived as lethal.
What is the Left saying?
Democrats are treating Good’s killing as proof that Trump’s crackdown is engineered for confrontation. Frey said the government’s self-defense framing was a "garbage narrative" contradicted by video, and demanded the ICE leave Minneapolis.
Governor Tim Walz blamed "governance designed to generate fear, headlines and conflict," adding: "Today that recklessness cost someone their life," while state officials indicated parallel investigations alongside the FBI.
Some progressive voices moved quickly from outrage to certainty—using words like "murder" or "execution" before investigators have released full forensic details, interviews, or any federal body-camera footage.
But the president's critics see a broader pattern: Trump treating immigration protests as near-insurrection, not civic dissent—precisely the kind of frame that makes a trigger pull feel, to supporters, like policy.
What happens next?
Legally, the video footage of the Minneapolis incident will matter. The FBI is investigating, with state officials also launching their own probe; that means a slow collision between evidentiary detail (angles, timing, distance, contact) and political narrative (terrorist, martyr, self-defense, execution).
Politically, Minneapolis is unlikely to stay local. Thousands gathered at the site of the shooting and more protests spread risk across other cities—exactly the kind of feedback loop Trump’s second-term posture seems built for: confrontation produces backlash; backlash justifies escalation.
Internationally, the Iran rhetoric is the awkward mirror. Trump has promised "rescue," but the credibility of that moral stance frays when, at home, the same president is quick to label a dead citizen a violent assailant before investigators finish rewinding the tape.
Once a core feature of Newsweek’s print edition, Perspectives distilled the week’s news into a chorus of standout quotes. Today, we’re relaunching Perspectives in a different format, but with the same mission of keeping our members informed by showcasing the views that shape the conversation.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines