...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
President Donald Trump signaled Monday that the Iran war could be nearing an end. After weeks of escalation, he now says the U.S. is engaged in "very strong talks" with Iranian figures, has delayed planned strikes on key infrastructure, and is outlining a potential deal to end Tehran’s nuclear program.
But, as throughout this conflict, the picture is far from clear. Iran denies that any negotiations are taking place. Trump has shifted tone repeatedly, moving from threats to bomb power plants within 48 hours to granting a five-day pause. And officials on all sides continue to present sharply different versions of events.
Read More on Analysis
If Iran digs in, the conflict could turn into a prolonged and costly standoff. By maintaining its de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran has raised the stakes beyond the battlefield. The central issue is no longer just Iran’s capabilities, but global economic stability.
These are five possible scenarios for how the conflict could end:
1. Iran Backs Down, Trump Wins
The outcome Trump is describing would be a decisive one: Iran agreeing to sweeping concessions, and the war ending largely on U.S. terms.
According to the president, that would mean Tehran abandoning its nuclear program entirely, including handing over enriched uranium stockpiles that could be used in weapons development, and stepping back from destabilizing actions such as disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. In return, the United States would halt its military campaign, ease immediate pressure, and potentially move toward a broader diplomatic settlement that stabilizes the region.
There are signs Washington believes this scenario is achievable. Trump has delayed planned strikes on Iranian power plants, creating a narrow window for diplomacy, and says senior advisers, including Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, are leading talks behind the scenes. Regional powers such as Turkey and Egypt have also stepped in, suggesting early-stage mediation efforts are underway.
But this scenario faces a fundamental obstacle. Iran has consistently rejected demands to abandon uranium enrichment, arguing it has the sovereign right to pursue nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Accepting Trump’s terms would not just be a policy shift. It would amount to a significant strategic and political defeat for Tehran’s leadership.
Likelihood: 2/5
2. Iran Duplicity: Diplomacy Without Resolution
A more ambiguous scenario is one where diplomacy appears to be happening, but without meaningfully resolving the conflict.
In this version, Iran signals openness or engages indirectly, while avoiding any real concessions on its core positions. Talks may be hinted at, mediated through third parties, or conducted behind the scenes, but without producing a binding agreement. Instead, Tehran could offer limited steps, delay tactics, or symbolic gestures designed to ease pressure without dismantling its nuclear capabilities.
There are already clear signs pointing in this direction. Trump has suggested the two sides have reached "major points of agreement." But Iranian officials have flatly rejected that narrative. Iranian Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has called reports of negotiations "fake news," accusing Washington of trying to manipulate financial and oil markets and "escape the quagmire" of the war. Iran’s foreign ministry has also indicated that while "friendly" countries have passed along messages suggesting the U.S. wants talks, Tehran has not engaged.
At the same time, the conflict itself continues. Iran maintains threats against U.S. and regional targets, while military activity across the region shows little sign of stopping.
The result is a familiar pattern: competing narratives, tentative signals, and no clear breakthrough. Both sides can claim momentum—Trump by pointing to talks, Iran by denying pressure has worked—but little changes on the ground.
Likelihood: 3/5
3. Messy Drawdown: No Deal, No Winner
The third scenario is the least dramatic, but perhaps the most likely.
Here, the war gradually winds down without a formal agreement. The U.S. reduces its military activity, Iran eases pressure on key shipping routes, and both sides step back from escalation without resolving the core dispute over nuclear capabilities.
There are early signs of this path. Trump has delayed major strikes and avoided committing to further escalation, even as the U.S. continues to build up forces in the region. The costs of the conflict are also mounting: more than 2,000 people have been killed, and global energy markets have been shaken.
Oil prices, which surged as the war intensified, dropped sharply after Trump suggested talks were underway, highlighting how sensitive the global economy is to even the hint of de-escalation.
But without a clear deal, the underlying issues remain. Iran’s government is still in place. Its nuclear program is not dismantled. And the broader regional conflict, including fighting involving Hezbollah, continues.
Likelihood: 4/5
4. Iran Digs In: A War That Becomes Harder to End
A fourth scenario is one where Iran digs in, turning the conflict into a prolonged and costly standoff.
As long as Tehran maintains its de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the United States cannot simply declare victory and walk away. By disrupting a route that carries roughly a fifth of global oil, Iran has shifted the stakes from regional security to global economic stability.
This fundamentally changes the endgame. The central objective is no longer just weakening Iran’s capabilities, but reopening the Strait—something now controlled by Tehran’s actions, not Washington’s timeline.
In this scenario, neither side backs down. The conflict drags on, markets remain volatile, and the war becomes harder to end than it was to start.
Likelihood: 3/5
5. Regime Collapse: Revolution From Within
A more dramatic scenario is regime collapse triggered by internal unrest. Iran was already facing its most serious domestic pressure in years, with widespread protests driven by economic crisis, inflation, and political repression.
In theory, sustained war, economic shock, and leadership instability could push that unrest into a full-scale uprising. Trump has suggested military pressure could weaken the regime enough for Iranians to "take over" their government.
But the obstacles are significant. There is no unified opposition ready to take power, and Iran’s security apparatus, especially the Revolutionary Guard, remains largely intact and loyal.
Recent intelligence suggests the regime is consolidating power, not collapsing.
Likelihood: 1/5
An Evolving Endgame
Ultimately, Trump is trying to define how this war ends on his terms, through pressure and a deal. But the range of possible outcomes shows how little control any one actor truly has.
From decisive victory to drawn-out stalemate or even internal upheaval, each path carries risks not just for the region, but for the global economy.
What happens next will depend less on rhetoric and more on actions: whether talks materialize, whether Iran shifts course, and whether escalation resumes.
Hey gang, Carlo Versano here. I hope you enjoyed this article. As Newsweek's Director of Politics and Culture and editor of the 1600 newsletter, I'm keen to hear what you think. Now, Newsweek is offering a new service to allow you to communicate directly with me in the form of a text message chat. You can sign up and get a direct line to me, as well as the reporters who work for me. You can shape our coverage.
As a Newsweek member, we're offering this service to you for free. You can sign up below, or read more about how it works here. Let's talk!
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines