...
By Jesus Mesa
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Back in February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House early after a tense meeting with Donald Trump that ended in a heated exchange. This week, he stood in the same room smiling for cameras, cracking jokes with Trump, and accepting compliments on his suit from the assembled press pool as European leaders looked on.
The shift in tone was stark. Administration officials described the atmosphere as "terrific" and "really productive," and Vice President JD Vance — who clashed with Zelensky during the previous visit — kept a low profile.
Yet for Trump's MAGA base, the change in mood did little to ease concerns over what came next.
Read More on Politics
Trump's sudden openness to offering NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine has drawn a sharp rebuke from his hardcore allies, reigniting tensions over America's role in the war.
Steve Bannon, the former White House strategist and a leading voice in the "America First" movement, launched a direct attack on the proposed security deal. Speaking on his War Room podcast, Bannon condemned the talks as globalist overreach — though he stopped short of naming Trump directly.
"I want to give a security guarantee to the citizens of the United States on these invaders right now. That's the security guarantee I want," Bannon said. "This entire war is so that Ukraine could be a Western country. Well, I don't give a tinker's d---."
His objections reflect a growing unease among conservatives who see the potential for Article 5-like protections — NATO's mutual defense clause — as a fundamental betrayal of the movement's anti-interventionist core.
"There can't be any guarantee here from the United States, because that's going to inextricably link us to this conflict," Bannon told Politico. "If we don't fund this, it stops happening. The Europeans don't have the hardware or the money."
...
Online, the grassroots echoed that frustration. "All I heard were Article 5 and security guarantees," one user wrote on X. "If POTUS agrees with that, we MAGA are out. Sorry, but you broke your promise."
Highlighting that divine, another wrote: "Get out of Ukraine! No more US money! No more US weapons! No Article 5 US security guarantees! World War II is over!"
Ukraine Cannot Join NATO, Trump Says
Trump, for his part, has drawn a firm line. In a series of posts ahead of the summit, he reiterated that Ukraine would not join NATO, declaring "no going into NATO by Ukraine" and claiming Zelensky "can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to."
Instead, Trump has backed the idea of a standalone security framework — stopping short of NATO membership — that would still offer Ukraine significant protection.
According to U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, that framework could include "security guarantees," obligating the U.S. and European allies to respond if Ukraine is attacked. Witkoff called the potential agreement "game-changing," though the details remain vague.
...
"When we talk about security guarantees, we're talking about the security of the entire European continent," French President Emmanuel Macron said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte added that discussions would include guarantees similar to those already extended to alliance members.
While Trump said Tuesday he gave "his assurance" that no U.S. troops would be sent to defend Ukraine's border, a senior official told Politico the president might support a U.S. peacekeeping role "if it was the final piece of the puzzle."
That ambiguity has only deepened anxiety among MAGA-aligned Republicans. Many see any military commitment abroad as a step back toward the kind of endless wars Trump once promised to end.
"The war we got to win is right here in this country," Bannon said. "That's the war that we got to be focused on."
Like the MAGA base, Ukraine has been wary of what security guarantees will ultimately look like. Zelensky said the U.S. had sent a strong signal on the matter but noted he could not provide concrete details until more were finalized in the next 10 days.
However, Zelensky also stressed that peace must be "lasting" and not repeat the shortcomings of the "so-called 'security guarantees' of 1994."
"They didn't work," Zelensky said on Monday.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines