...

By Hollie Silverman

News Editor

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.

A major U.S. technology company ignited controversy after urging the federal government to adopt a system of universal national service, a move that critics say edges toward endorsing a military draft.

In the post on X Sunday, Palantir shared a number of rules, including one that read: "National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost."

The call from Palantir Technologies drew attention online after its post was reposted, prompting debate about the role of private defense‑tech firms in shaping national policy

Read More on News

The Context

Advocacy groups have criticized Palantir for providing software used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Palantir's post comes amid the Iran war as it intensifies U.S. military commitments, strained global supply chains, and raised questions about long‑term manpower needs.

The conflict—now in its seventh week—began with U.S.‑Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, triggering a regional escalation that has included missile exchanges, naval clashes, and a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly warned that Iran faces severe consequences if it does not agree to a peace deal, even threatening to “blow up the whole country” if negotiations fail.

...

What Is Palantir?

Palantir Technologies is a U.S.-based data‑analytics and software company founded in 2003. It builds platforms that allow governments, intelligence agencies, militaries, and private companies to analyze extremely large and complex datasets.

The company has won major Pentagon contracts, including work on Project Maven, an AI‑driven targeting and surveillance program.

Its platforms are used for battlefield decision‑making, logistics, and targeting support in multiple conflict zones

The company is known for three major software platforms including Palantir Gotham—used by U.S. intelligence and defense agencies for counterterrorism, battlefield intelligence, and real‑time operational analysis; Palantir Foundry—used by corporations for supply‑chain management, logistics, and large‑scale data integration; and Palantir Apollo—a system that deploys and maintains Palantir’s software across secure and distributed networks.

Is There a Mandatory Draft?

The Selective Service System (SSS) moved toward automatically registering most draft-eligible men by December after submitting a proposed rule for review on March 30, a step that followed Congress authorizing the change in the fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, according to the federal regulatory dashboard earlier this month.

Eligible men ages 18 to 25 will be registered automatically into the military draft pool by the end of this year.

Automatic registration aims to boost compliance with federal law requiring most males in that age bracket to register with Selective Service and addresses recent declines in registration rates

The change will shift responsibility away from the individual to register and place it with Selective Service to identify eligible young men more efficiently, the agency says in part on its website.

How Would a Universal National Service System Work?

A “universal national service” system usually means requiring, or strongly encouraging, all young adults to spend a period—often one to two years—serving the country in some structured way.

Similar systems are in place in South Korea and Israel which requires citizens to join the military at age 18.

Other options don't necessarily require military enlistment but instead participation in civil service work such as infrastructure projects, environmental conservation, disaster response, public health work and education support.

Some countries already use hybrid systems. For example, Germany used to allow alternatives to military service (Zivildienst), and Switzerland still offers civilian options.

What To Know/What Did the Post Say?

Palantir made a post on X about the company's position Saturday saying in part, "Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief" before sharing 22 credos outlined in the book, written by Palantir co-founder Alexander C. Karp along with Nicholas W. Zamiska.

1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation.
2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible.
3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public.
4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.
5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.
6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost.
7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way.
8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive.
9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret.
10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed.
11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice.
12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin.
13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet.
14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war.
15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia.
16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn.
17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives.
18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.
19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all.
20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim.
21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.
22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?

What Is The Technological Republic?

Published in February 2025, The Technological Republic is co-authored by Palantir CEO Alex Karp and Nicholas Zamiska. The book's thesis is that western liberal democracies are in decline not because of external enemies, but because their technological elites have retreated from civic responsibility.

Karp and Zamiska argue that Silicon Valley has grown wealthy and powerful while deliberately distancing itself from the state, national defence, and any sense of shared obligation.

The duo call for a reorientation — in which tech companies actively partner with democratic governments on matters of national security, and in which citizens, including the technologically skilled, accept a broader duty of service.

The Technological Republic acts and reads as Palantir's manifesto providing the foundation for Palantir's own unapologetically pro-defence, pro-state positioning in an industry that has long prided itself on 'political neutrality'.

Reactions and Backlash

The post saw immediate backlash across social media, including posts on X and Reddit.

In one reaction to the post, Simon Dixon, a geopolitical and financial analyst, warned people about Palantir saying, "The First and Second Amendments do not fix what Palantir is planning for you."

"You can’t shoot the algorithm. They beta-tested a full surveillance state and pre-crime arrest technology in the UK and Gaza. They want to roll it out globally," Dixon wrote. "It will form the backbone of programmable stablecoins and central bank digital currencies. It will use your social credit score, built on this app. This is the technical industrial complex’s end product created by veterans in the military industrial and financial industrial complex."

Patrick Henningson, a journalist and geopolitical analyst who founded 21st Century Wire, shared Dixon's sentiment.

"So you want permanent war," Henningson wrote. "It’s George Orwell’s 1984, verbatim. Psychopaths."

Founder & CIO of Totem Macro Whitney Baker also questioned Palantir's stance, writing, "This fundamentally confuses meritocratic capitalism with unmeritocratic imperialism."

"The former is democratic, by consent, and the latter is authoritarian, by force. They are not the same and the latter is in actuality, contradictory to the former, just as much as the money printing that finances it is contrary to sound capital allocation," she continued.

"Bad money drives out good. Bad ethics drive out good. Survivalism drives out abundance. Supporting wars of choice is not a moral responsibility for any subjects of an overreaching government leviathan," Baker wrote. "Such a leviathan is run by powers that engage in those wars for personal gain and not for the benefit or 'security' of the broader population, which are both directly harmed by it."

What Happens Next

The federal government has not signaled any move toward legislation on universal national service, and no draft‑related proposals are currently advancing in Congress.

Critics of compulsory service—including analysts at the Hoover Institution—argue universal national service would restrict personal freedom and could complicate military recruitment, while supporters say it could help address manpower shortages and strengthen civic participation.

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines