...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Wang Wang led an apparently unremarkable life, until its brutal ending. Given her name by the residents who fed her, she lived as a stray in Guangdong province, China. Now Wang Wang has featured on billboards in Chinese cities, on a crowdfunded screen in Hong Kong's Mong Kok, and on advertising boards in Taipei and New York's Times Square. More than 70,000 people have signed a petition asking China to change the law. The reason lies in how Wang Wang died a month ago today, on June 28.
That morning, a group of boys beat her three puppies to death with sticks, tied a wire around her neck and dragged her along the ground, then poured flammable liquid over her and set her alight. They filmed all of it and posted the video. At least four boys were involved, all of them under 14.
Read More on Analysis
Two days later the town government published a notice. It confirmed the abuse, said the boys were below the age of criminal responsibility, and sent them to a specialized school for corrective education. Not once did it mention the word cruelty, or torture. It closed by asking internet users "not to spread related information."
Asking a whole country to stop talking about something is a difficult task, and this time it failed. Posts came down and went back up on new accounts. Supporters bought billboards, in more than a hundred cities. When domestic screens became risky they crowdfunded foreign ones, translated the material into more than 10 languages and eventually put Wang Wang on that advertising board in Times Square. By the third week of July, several million people had worked out how to organize.
Beijing had seen something like this coming, though not in this form or scale. On February 12, the Cyberspace Administration of China instructed platforms to remove and demote any content that "incites negative feelings," an order Freedom House reckons cut protest-related posts on Douyin, the social media app, roughly in half. What Beijing could, or should, also have known is that a government had already lost this precise argument once, over a different dead dog, in 1910.
...
Common Knowledge
China's censors are usually described as close to airtight. Freedom House scored the country nine out of 100 for internet freedom in 2025, the worst conditions anywhere for over a decade, sustained by a system grown steadily in reach under Xi Jinping. But they do not treat everything alike. Harvard researchers Gary King, Jennifer Pan and Margaret Roberts found that Chinese censors tolerate some criticism while coming down hard on anything likely to "spur social mobilization." That’s the point, though. The problem for Beijing was not that people were angry about Wang Wang, but that angry people mobilized.
Uncommon Knowledge
In 1903 two Swedish anti-vivisectionists alleged that a brown terrier had been cut open at University College London in an inadequately anesthetized experiment. The physiologist they named sued for libel and won. His opponents reacted by putting up a statue of the dog in Battersea, then a poor and radical district in London, with an inscription accusing the university of causing its death. Medical students kept trying to smash it despite a police guard. In December 1907 hundreds of students fought police, suffragists and trade unionists in what the papers unimaginatively called the Brown Dog riots, and the row reached Parliament.
Like Beijing, Battersea tried to solve the problem by getting rid of the memory of the dog. In 1910 workmen took the statue away before dawn and it was melted down. That was too late. By then the terrier stood for class tension, the standing of women in public life, and for the right to make a nuisance of oneself in public. Cruelty to animals can carry grievances far larger than itself.
The timeline in China, 2026, doesn’t look so different. The actor Du Jiang posted on Douyin on July 5 condemning the killing. The Taiwanese actress Joe Chen criticized it on Weibo on July 14, and her post disappeared within seconds. The deletion itself then trended. Neither platform has publicly explained what happened.
Not every deletion was the government's work. In mid-July the Hong Kong SPCA, an independent charity plainly on the campaigners' side, asked police to have the uncut video taken off Threads and YouTube, arguing that circulating it would distress people and might encourage copycats. Campaigners rounded on the charity for taking pressure off the authorities. It apologized and canceled its annual Flag Day fundraiser.
Nor was Wang Wang the first warning in China itself. In June, residents of Chongqing accused a man of taking dogs on false promises of adoption and then abusing them. Hundreds gathered outside his building for days. Police broke up the crowd, injuring several people and briefly detaining dozens, and arrested the man after the protest. They could hold him only under public-order law, there being no cruelty offense to charge him with.
Freedom House's monitors, who logged 846 separate protests in China in the second quarter of this year, put Chongqing in a specific bracket: at least 28 occasions since 2024 on which a personal tragedy brought hundreds of people onto the street, usually to complain about how local officials handled it.
They do have something to complain about. Replying to a local legislator in May, the agriculture bureau in Quanzhou said, unconvincingly, that there was still no social consensus for a dedicated anti-cruelty law. It then mentioned that local police had been lobbying to add cruelty provisions to public-order law, because they wanted something clearer to work with.
Zhao Wanping, a delegate to the National People's Congress, filed his eighth animal-protection proposal since 2017 in March, yet May's legislative plan contains no such law. A citizens' poll during the justice ministry's consultation drew 4.1 million votes in favor, 96 percent of those cast, from a country whose urban households now keep an estimated 126 million dogs and cats.
Maya Wang, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, says the issue has touched a nerve among young Chinese for whom a pet is the main source of companionship. That’s central. Animal lovers include nationalists, parents, apolitical shoppers and celebrities who back Xi on every other question. All the people who voiced their outrage over Wang Wang now have a playbook, even if they are not hostile to the Communist Party itself.
Wang Wang was a stray dog, not a dissident, and the movement in her name is divided and hopelessly outmatched. But anxious governments do not only fear revolutions. They fear rehearsals. The campaign for Wang Wang was a rehearsal for protesting without a platform, raising money without an organization and getting a message out of the country. Those memories can’t be censored.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines