...
By Amanda Castro
Associate News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
A White House request for $87.6 billion in emergency funding has now landed in Congress, seeking to replenish Pentagon accounts drained by the Iran war. Of that, farmers would be allocated $11.1 billion toward economic assistance.
Lawmakers in both parties have grown increasingly resistant to further military action, leaving the package on politically fragile ground.
The proposal affects farmers, defense personnel, and domestic programs, and could reshape spending priorities if Congress approves it in the coming weeks.
Read More on News
The Office of Management and Budget submitted the request on Wednesday, just hours after President Donald Trump clashed with Republican senators over their support for a war‑powers resolution aimed at halting additional hostilities. OMB Director Russ Vought urged Congress to move quickly, saying the funds are needed for “urgent” military and domestic needs.
Newsweek has reached out to the Department of Agriculture for comment.
...
What’s in the $87.6B Request?
The administration’s proposal is built around replenishing military resources consumed during the Iran conflict.
The Pentagon’s portion includes:
- $21 billion for weapons and munitions
- $17.3 billion for operational costs
- $12.1 billion for classified programs
- Additional funds for fuel, drone production, and cybersecurity
Republican appropriators Tom Cole and Ken Calvert said the request reflects the need to maintain U.S. military strength, while Democrats signaled deep skepticism. Senator Patty Murray, the top Democrat on Senate Appropriations, warned that the package attempts to secure “tens of billions of additional dollars for unrelated Pentagon priorities.”
How Farmers Stand to Benefit
American farmers are feeling the ripple effects of the war in Iran, not on the battlefield but in their balance sheets, as disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz have sent fertilizer and fuel prices soaring during a critical planting season.
For growers already operating on thin margins, the spike in input costs has forced difficult choices—cutting back on fertilizer, switching crops, or absorbing steep losses—and has exposed how global conflict can quickly destabilize domestic agriculture.
Tennessee farmer Todd Littleton told The Hill he expects to pay $100,000 more for fertilizer this season—a 40 percent increase from last year, thanks to the war in Iran.
“The problem is, is we’re so strained financially coming into this issue… it just really couldn’t happen at a worse time,” Tennessee farmer Todd Littleton said, capturing the widespread anxiety across farm country as producers face sharply higher costs with little room to adapt.
$11.1 billion would be allocated to American farmers, who have faced rising fuel costs, supply‑chain disruptions, and export volatility linked to the conflict. The administration has not released a detailed breakdown of the allocation to farmers.
For lawmakers wary of approving more war spending, farm aid could become a key bargaining chip. Rural Republicans, in particular, may face pressure from constituents who want relief even as they oppose further escalation abroad.
Global and Domestic Add‑Ons: Ebola, Restoration, Hemp & More
Beyond defense and agriculture, the request includes:
- $1.4 billion for Ebola response efforts in Central Africa
- $500 million for restoration and construction projects in and around Washington, D.C.
- $1 billion for the modernization of New York’s Penn Station
- Policy proposals on hemp regulation, renewable fuels, and federal investment rules involving Venezuela
These additions appear designed to broaden the coalition of lawmakers who might support the bill, such as interest from Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries on the Penn Station portion.
A Difficult Path in Congress
It remains unclear whether Congress will act quickly—or at all. Many lawmakers view any vote on the package as a referendum on the war itself, complicating its prospects.
If Congress takes up the request, lawmakers could break it apart, shrink it, or attach additional domestic priorities. If approved, the funding would immediately bolster Pentagon operations while delivering significant new support to farmers and other domestic programs.
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Gabe Whisnant, Sam Wilson and Gray R. Thomas
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines