10
Loading video...
By Justin Bette
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Housing is more than an asset class. It can determine when people leave home, when families form, where businesses invest, and whether a generation can build financial security.
That is why I believe Americans should be paying far more attention to what is happening in the condominium market right now.
The U.S. condominium market could face significant repricing over the next two quarters. The trigger is unusually specific.
Read More on Leadership Insights
Changes to the condominium lending and insurance standards used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are reshaping financing requirements, with some provisions tightening eligibility and others easing insurance requirements.
These changes are already affecting transactions. The broader consequences could arrive faster than most people expect.
The Dangers of a 'Non-Warrantable' Mortgage
When a condominium becomes "non-warrantable," conventional lenders may be unable to sell the resulting mortgage to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
The buyer pool can then shrink, with cash buyers, portfolio lenders and other forms of financing potentially becoming more important.
...
Fannie Mae’s current project standards require lenders to examine a condominium's financial condition, reserves, and insurance, while Freddie Mac similarly maintains project eligibility standards and a process for identifying projects that do not qualify.
The changes coming into focus are substantial. Beginning January 4, 2027, the minimum replacement-reserve allocation used in the applicable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac condominium reviews is scheduled to increase from 10 percent to 15 percent of annual budgeted assessment income.
That represents a 50 percent increase in the minimum required allocation. Fannie Mae has also introduced changes affecting reserve studies and property insurance requirements, with important provisions taking effect in 2026.
These numbers may look like technical details buried in mortgage guidelines. They are not. They can determine whether a buyer can obtain financing for an individual home.
The Real-Life Impact of Mortgage Policy Changes
I have already seen how quickly this can move from policy language to real people. In New England, a condominium development near us with roughly 2,580 homes and about 4,000 residents became non-warrantable this year.
In one office alone, three transactions were lost in a single week because the financing could not be completed. That is what a change in underwriting criteria looks like on the ground.
It is a family’s disrupted plans, a seller who cannot close, and a buyer who suddenly has to find another source of financing.
The underlying issue is understandable. The collapse of Champlain Towers South in Surfside, Florida, in 2021 underscored the consequences of structural deficiencies, deviations from original design and construction, added loads and long-term deterioration.
The response has been a legitimate effort to strengthen condominium finances and insurance protections. Fannie Mae’s standards require condominium projects to maintain master property insurance, while 2026 changes have introduced greater flexibility in some coverage requirements.
When Risk Controls Go Too Far
So what happens when necessary risk controls become so restrictive that they impair the marketability of otherwise habitable homes? There are two possible futures.
In the optimistic one, regulators, lenders, insurers, and lawmakers recognize the unintended consequences early, refine the standards where appropriate, and create a system that protects buildings without unnecessarily destroying liquidity.
Condominium owners gain stronger reserves, buyers regain confidence, and the market absorbs the changes gradually.
The darker scenario is a rapid repricing of condominiums followed by a broader housing slowdown. Financing becomes more difficult, demand contracts, and sellers accept lower prices.
Owners who planned to sell their condominium to finance a larger single-family home discover that their equity has fallen. That reduces what they can put toward the next home. The pressure then moves outward through the housing market.
That is basic economics. If the pool of qualified buyers shrinks while supply remains available, prices face downward pressure.
I'm Not Predicting Another 2008, But…
History tells us to take that transmission mechanism seriously. Housing corrections rarely remain neatly contained within one category of property.
The 2008 financial crisis demonstrated how quickly stress in one segment can spread through credit, housing, and the broader economy. The subsequent recovery was measured in years, not weeks.
I am not predicting another 2008.
I am warning against assuming that today’s condominium problem can remain isolated simply because it begins with condominiums.
There is another reason this matters now. Americans are already entering homeownership later in life.
The National Association of Realtors reported that the median age of a first-time homebuyer reached 40 in 2025, the highest level recorded, while first-time buyers accounted for only 21 percent of purchases, also a record low.
That statistic should concern anyone thinking about America’s social and economic future.
When housing becomes harder to finance, young adults can remain in the family home longer. Couples can postpone buying. Families can postpone moving into larger homes. Employers can face a less mobile workforce.
Communities can see fewer transactions, and each transaction supports a network of movers, contractors, furniture businesses, lenders, attorneys, and other local services.
The demographic consequences deserve attention as well. Housing affordability is only one factor behind changing family formation, but it is a factor we should not dismiss.
This is why I consider the condominium market a warning light. It is flashing before the broader housing market has necessarily reacted.
There's Still Time to Change Direction
I do not believe this outcome is inevitable.
These are policy choices, and policy choices can be revisited. Federal policymakers should demand transparent analysis of how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s evolving condominium standards affect financing availability, property values, and housing mobility.
State officials should examine insurance and condominium regulations for unintended consequences. Condo boards should understand precisely how their reserves and insurance policies affect mortgage eligibility.
Buyers and sellers should ask whether a property is currently warrantable, whether that status is expected to change, and what the association’s reserve study and insurance coverage actually show.
And during this election season, voters should ask candidates and elected representatives a simple question: What are you doing to preserve access to condominium financing while maintaining legitimate standards for safety and financial resilience?
We should not wait for a repricing to tell us the warning was real.
The time to examine the rules is while we can still change the outcome.
Justin Bette is a third-generation real estate professional and broker-owner of Century 21 Bette Real Estate in Southbury, Connecticut. He currently serves as Region 2 Vice President of Connecticut Realtors.
The views expressed are the author's own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines