A race- and sex-based hiring quota placed on the Cincinnati Police Department in the 1980s to improve its diversity issues was lifted on Friday by a federal judge, who said that the changes are no longer constitutional.
A consent decree was imposed in 1981 when the department was less than 10 percent Black and only 3.4 of its officers were women.
Now, almost 30 percent of the department is Black and 23 percent are women. But since the agreement was made, the U.S. Supreme Court has frowned upon race and sex-based affirmative action, U.S. District Judge Susan Dlott said.
She said that while hiring goals can help fix diversity problems, they cannot be used to maintain diverse staffing.
"Here, by merely stating that evidence of past discrimination by CPD over 40 years ago justifies the use of remedial race-based classifications, the City fails to provide any evidence that at this time the race-based hiring and promotional goals continue to remedy past discrimination or any lingering effects therefrom," Dlott said in Wednesday's ruling.
For more reporting from the Associated Press, see below.
Dlott noted Cincinnati has admitted that efforts to diversify the department have been relatively successful.
The Justice Department asked Dlott to remove the requirements following a lawsuit filed last year by a white Cincinnati police sergeant who said he was discriminated against when a Black officer further down on the eligibility list was allowed to leapfrog over him to become sergeant.
That officer, Erik Kohler, was thus denied seniority and preferential job assignments, and also lost pay, his attorney, Chris Wiest, argued in a November complaint. Kohler challenged both the 1981 federal consent decree, which included preferences for promotion to sergeant, and a 1987 state consent decree related to promotion to captain and lieutenant. Kohler started with the department in 1999 as a cadet.
Wiest said Friday it's unlikely Dlott's ruling could harm the police department's diversity, pointing out that multiple senior officers, including Chief Eliot Isaac, are people of color or women.
"Some people believe that we need these requirements, but I think from my client's perspective, if you want to end race and sex discrimination, you have to stop discriminating on the basis of race and sex," Wiest said. Similar requirements in other municipalities have previously been lifted for the same reasons, he added.
The Justice Department said it is committed to helping Cincinnati maintain the progress it has made and continue to advance to a more diverse workforce.
"However, the City's use of race- and sex-conscious numerical goals for African-American and female applicants as a purportedly interim measure to remedy past discrimination must be justified under current legal standards, not the legal standards in place in 1981," attorneys with the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division argued in June.
Mayor John Cranley, a Democrat who is white, and Isaac, who is Black, wrote President Joe Biden in March, arguing that the agreement should be kept in place.
"As the current police chief, I can say that my own career benefitted from the consent decree," Isaac said in that March 3 letter. "Without it, I would not be chief."
Cranley said Friday the city is considering whether to appeal. "We certainly wish the DOJ did not take this action, as the consent decree has been important to our progress," Cranley said.
Although the 1981 consent decree helped diversify the Cincinnati Police Department, the city has continued to face racially related challenges over the years.
In 2001, two decades after the consent decree was established, race riots rocked Cincinnati following the shooting death of Timothy Thomas, who was Black, by a white officer.
Afterward, Cincinnati adopted an agreement between the city, a police union, an activist group and the ACLU to aid changes to the department.
