North Carolina Voter ID Law Ruled Racially Biased, Unconstitutional as it's Halted by Court

North Carolina's voter ID law was ruled racially biased and unconstitutional by judges, halting the law with a 2-1 Friday ruling, the Associated Press reported.

Judges said the law intentionally discriminated against Black voters, violating their equal protections.

The law "was motivated at least in part by an unconstitutional intent to target African American voters," Superior Court Judges Michael O'Foghludha and Vince Rozier wrote in their 100-page majority opinion.

"Other, less restrictive voter ID laws would have sufficed to achieve the legitimate nonracial purposes of implementing the constitutional amendment requiring voter ID, deterring fraud, or enhancing voter confidence."

For more reporting from the Associated Press, see below.

North Carolina Voter ID Law
Judges ruled that North Carolina's 2018 voter ID law is racially biased against Black voters and unconstitutional. Above, North Carolina State University students wait in line to vote in the primaries at Pullen Community Center on March 15, 2016, in Raleigh. Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

The majority decision, which followed a three-week trial in April, is now likely headed to a state appeals court, which had previously blocked the law's enforcement last year while the case was heard. The law remains unenforceable with this ruling.

With a similar lawsuit in federal court set to go to trial this January and another state court lawsuit now on appeal, it's looking more unlikely that a voter ID mandate for in-person and absentee balloting will happen in the 2022 elections.

The ruling reflects "how the state's Republican-controlled legislature undeniably implemented this legislation to maintain its power by targeting voters of color," said Allison Riggs, the plaintiffs' lead attorney.

Spokespersons for Republican legislative leaders, House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger, didn't immediately respond to email requests for comment.

GOP legislative leaders have tried for a decade to require photo IDs to cast ballots.

Republicans have said voter ID laws are needed to build public confidence in elections and to prevent voter fraud, which remains rare nationwide. But many Democrats see the mandates as attempts at voter suppression.

In July, 2016, a federal appeals court struck down several portions of a 2013 North Carolina elections law that included a voter ID mandate, saying GOP lawmakers had written them with "almost surgical precision" to discourage voting by Black voters, who tend to support Democrats.

Lawyers for the voters who sued over the 2018 law said it suffered the same racial defects as the 2013 law—following a long effort by North Carolina elected officials to weaken African American voting as a way to retain control of the General Assembly. The 2013 law was carried out briefly in 2016 primary elections.

GOP legislative leaders and their attorneys disagreed, saying the latest ID rules were approved with substantial Democratic support and improved to retain ballot access while ensuring only legal citizens can vote.

The categories of qualifying IDs were greatly expanded compared to the 2013 law to include college student and government-employee IDs. Free IDs also are available from county elections boards or at early-voting sites, and people without IDs can still vote if they fill out a form at the voting precinct.

In a dissenting opinion, Judge Nathaniel Poovey wrote that passage of the voter ID law falls in line with the state constitution, citing its support from several Black legislators and the citizens voting for the constitutional referendum.

"Competence evidence before this three-judge panel does not suggest our legislature enacted this law with a racially discriminatory intent," Poovey wrote.

But the majority on the panel decided that the changes didn't eliminate fully the racial bias and permanently blocked enforcement of the ID law.

About three dozen states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls, and about half of these states want photo ID only, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

A provision contained in a sweeping federal overhaul of elections pushed this year by congressional Democrats would effectively neuter state voter ID laws by allowing people without an ID to sign a form at the polls instead.

Six voters—five Black and one biracial—sued in Wake County court on the same day that GOP lawmakers overrode Democratic Governor Roy Cooper's veto of the 2018 voter ID bill.

During the trial, Some of the plaintiffs testified about their difficulties in obtaining an ID or voting when the earlier photo ID law was in effect.

Lawyers for the GOP said all voters would continue to be able to vote under the 2018 law.

The plaintiffs' case emphasized analysis from a University of Michigan professor who said Black voters are 39 percent more likely to lack a qualifying photo ID than white registered voters. The analysis, however, left out data on some categories of qualifying IDs.

Changes to these and other voting procedures in North Carolina once needed federal preapproval. But a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court ruling meant such "preclearance" actions were no longer required. The legislature approved the 2013 voter ID law just a few weeks after that ruling.

North Carolina House
Judges ruled North Carolina's voter ID law to be racially biased and unconstitutional, halting the law with a 2-1 ruling. Above, state House Speaker Tim Moore gavels in a session as North Carolina legislators convene on the House floor to move forward a coronavirus relief package in Raleigh on April 30, 2020. Gerry Broome, File/AP Photo