10
Loading video...
By Anna Commander and Gabe Whisnant
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to expedite a case challenging President Donald Trump's authority to impose broad tariffs under federal law.
The justices scheduled arguments for November, an unusually quick timetable by the court's standards.
Why It Matters
A federal appeals court previously found that a wide array of Trump's tariffs were illegally implemented by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
Read More
Amy Coney Barrett Responds to Concern Supreme Court Protecting Donald Trump3 min read
Donald Trump Reacts to Image of Alleged Epstein Birthday Note4 min read
ICE Detained Dad in US Since Age 7 as He Dropped His Son Off at School4 min read
The decision undercut a central element of Trump's unilateral trade strategy and economic platform and could potentially raise the prospect of refunds if the tariffs are ultimately struck down by the Supreme Court.
What To Know
Small businesses and states challenging the tariffs say Trump illegally invoked emergency powers to levy import taxes on goods from nearly every country, pushing them to the brink of potential collapse.
Lower courts have largely sided with the challengers but left most of the tariffs in place while the case proceeds.
According to the Associated Press, the businesses and states that challenged his tariff policy also agreed to the fast-tracked timeline.
Trump argued that he has the power to regulate the imports of the U.S., the AP notes, and if that power were taken away, the country would be on "the brink of economic catastrophe."
...
What People Are Saying
Rapid Response 47 on X earlier this month: ".@POTUS on tariffs: 'We have a very very big case in the Supreme Court... Our country has a chance to be unbelievably rich again... If we don't win that case, our country is going to suffer so greatly — but I think we're gonna have a big victory.'"
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, on X: "Now that August is in the books, tariff revenues topped over $31 billion in the month: a new record high. As collection continues to grow, the Trump Administration is fixing the financial shambles it inherited."
President Donald Trump, on Truth Social in August: "Without Tariffs, and all of the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS we have already taken in, our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated. In a 7 to 4 Opinion, a Radical Left group of judges didn't care, but one Democrat, Obama appointed, actually voted to save our Country. I would like to thank him for his Courage! He loves and respects the U.S.A."
What Happens Next
The court will hear arguments in November under an accelerated schedule and may issue a decision months afterward; the administration has urged a swift ruling to avoid what it says would be legal and diplomatic disruption.
If the justices rule that IEEPA does not permit these tariffs, the government could be potentially required to refund some collected duties and presidents going forward could face clearer statutory limits on unilateral trade actions.
Update 9/9/25, 5:57 p.m. ET: This article was updated with additional information.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines