...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
When The Matrix was absorbed into MAGA’s political symbolism during Donald Trump’s rise, the movie’s famous pill metaphor was blunt and effective.
Voters were told they faced a profound choice: take the blue pill and remain trapped in a comforting but false reality constructed by elites, or swallow the red pill and confront the hard truths about America, power and decline, with Trump as their guide.
It helped define a movement that prided itself on skepticism of institutions and hostility to official narratives. Being “redpilled” added a certain cachet to conservatives who declared themselves as enlightened swallowers.
Read More on Analysis
But MAGA’s most potent metaphor is returning in an unexpected form. This time, the dilemma is internal. And this time, Trump is the blue pill.
A Breaking Point Years in the Making
The Jeffrey Epstein files episode had already begun to erode Trump’s standing as the movement’s ultimate truth-teller, exposing limits to his ability—or willingness—to confront uncomfortable realities favored by his base.
Pressure has been building inside MAGA for weeks over the U.S. war in Iran and Trump’s close alignment with Israel.
Iran, and serious questions about its consequences for the U.S., has forced the issue for Trump.
Unlike previous flashpoints, this one implicated a core ideological promise of MAGA: that a Trump-led America would avoid foreign entanglements and reject the interventionism of the pre‑2016 Republican Party.
Instead, the movement now faces a reality in which Trump is justifying a war that many of his most vocal allies believe no “America First” president should have initiated or sustained.
It’s a choice between ideological purity and personal loyalty. At one point, they were the same thing within MAGA. But the divergence has arrived.
The Rebellion of MAGA Media Heavyweights
Some of the loudest challenges to Trump on Iran have come from prominent figures who once echoed or amplified his worldview.
Tucker Carlson, long one of the most influential voices in the MAGA sphere, and a guru of America First, delivered a blistering monologue criticizing Trump, U.S. involvement in Iran, and trashing its strategic and moral logic.
His comments, shared widely online, positioned the war as a betrayal of the populist mandate Trump once embodied, and that Carlson himself had campaigned for. He also blasted Trump for the tone and content of an explicit threat issued against Iran on Easter.
Megyn Kelly followed with a sharply critical segment on her own show, similarly arguing that escalation in Iran cut against the promises that initially animated Trump’s political revolution, calling his threats of civilizational destruction “disgusting” and a sign of weakness.
"I am sick of this s**t," Kelly said. "I am sick of it. Can't he just behave like a normal human?"
They were not alone. Candace Owens, who has maintained a massive online audience by blending cultural grievance, anti‑establishment politics, and outright conspiracy peddling, raised the idea of forcing Trump from office.
"The 25th amendment needs to be invoked. He is a genocidal lunatic. Our Congress and military need to intervene. We are beyond madness," Owens wrote on social media.
Alex Jones, a fringe but still influential figure at the edges of MAGA media, who built his fame on pushing outlandish conspiracies, offered even more strident denunciations, describing the Iran war as a catastrophic departure from populist nationalism.
“The new Trump is a rotting husk of the old Trump,” Jones said in a post on X.
What unites these reactions is not ideology—these figures span MAGA’s respectable and conspiratorial wings—but a shared conclusion: Trump is wrong, and worse, he is lying to shape a false narrative.
They, along with another former MAGA star, Marjorie Taylor Greene, are emerging as leaders in the movement’s civil war, where the U.S. relationship with Israel in particular—vital in the Iran war—is a major dividing line.
Trump’s Counterattack—and What It Reveals
Trump responded to these attacks in kind, and in classically Trumpian fashion.
In a Truth Social post, he explicitly singled out Carlson, Kelly, Owens, and Jones, launching tailored attacks that accused them of disloyalty, opportunism, and distortion, and mocked their own recent struggles.
They all “have one thing in common, Low IQs,” Trump wrote. “They’re stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too! Look at their past, look at their record. They don’t have what it takes, and they never did!”
The substance of Trump’s rebuttal mattered less than its posture.
Rather than reconcile MAGA’s competing instincts—restraint abroad versus strength through force—Trump attempted to reassert himself as sole arbiter of the movement’s reality and discredit critical voices within the movement.
Iran, in his telling, represents a decisive demonstration of American power and strategic clarity, a clear and complete victory. Dissenters, by implication, are either naïve, compromised, or plain old dumb.
It does little to resolve the ideological crisis within MAGA. But it does help force things to a head.
Two Realities, One Movement
Beneath the public sparring lies MAGA’s most fundamental choice yet.
The movement can accept Trump’s claim that American power is being successfully wielded and strengthened in Iran, the costs are justified, and deluded critics misunderstand the stakes.
Or it can choose a rival interpretation, that the U.S. is sliding into another misguided and costly foreign war, contradicting the very principles MAGA claims to uphold.
Iran is uniquely suited to force this decision. It strips away ambiguity.
Either America is winning a war that makes the country stronger in the world, or it is becoming entangled in a conflict that weakens credibility, drains resources, and undermines “America First.”
There is no rhetorical middle ground.
MAGA’s Longstanding Claim to Hidden Truths
MAGA has always characterized itself as a truth‑seeking movement.
Accusations of conspiracy thinking were brushed aside with the claim that the movement was often proved right.
Adherents routinely spoke of two realities: the official story and the hidden truth accessible only to those willing to question it.
That dynamic worked to Trump’s advantage when he controlled the narrative.
During January 6 and his subsequent legal battles over the 2020 election, for example, MAGA largely accepted Trump’s interpretation of events, even when it conflicted with established facts. Loyalty and truth became intertwined.
The Epstein files episode exposed cracks in that arrangement. Trump’s reluctance to confront or disclose what portions of his base expected him to revealed the limits of his authority as MAGA’s truth broker.
Iran has tightened those limits around him even closer.
The Post‑Trump Question Arrives Early
The deeper significance of this moment lies in its timing.
Trump will leave office in January 2029. MAGA knows this. The movement’s most serious figures are already thinking in post‑Trump terms, even as many continue to publicly defend him.
Iran accelerates that reckoning. If Trump is wrong here, then MAGA must decide whether loyalty to the man outweighs loyalty to the worldview he helped forge.
For a movement that once insisted the messenger mattered less than the message, this is an existential tension.
MAGA is fighting on these issues today to shape the movement’s tomorrow.
It knows it must evolve beyond him if it is to survive as the driving force of American conservative politics. And it must choose Trump’s successor sooner than he leaves.
It is laying the ground for the Republican presidential battle to come and setting the ideological expectations for Trump's heir.
Pope, Antipope—and Morpheus
In a week when the Avignon Papacy unexpectedly surfaced in White House conversations, drawing a parallel is too tempting to resist.
MAGA now resembles a movement with a pope and an antipope: Trump as institutional authority and Carlson as insurgent claimant to moral truth.
But MAGA’s cultural language is not medieval theology. It is pop‑cultural rebellion. And in that vocabulary, The Matrix still reigns.
Trump is no longer Morpheus, the figure offering liberation through painful reality.
That’s Carlson now, and he’s offering to show MAGA how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Remember, all he’s offering is the truth—nothing more.
Hey gang, Carlo Versano here. I hope you enjoyed this article. As Newsweek's Director of Politics and Culture and editor of the 1600 newsletter, I'm keen to hear what you think. Now, Newsweek is offering a new service to allow you to communicate directly with me in the form of a text message chat. You can sign up and get a direct line to me, as well as the reporters who work for me. You can shape our coverage.
As a Newsweek member, we're offering this service to you for free. You can sign up below, or read more about how it works here. Let's talk!
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines